Determining the optimal leading limb for gait initiation in unilateral transtibial amputees: A systematic review.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Prosthetics and Orthotics International Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1097/PXR.0000000000000363
Nahid Tafti, Ensieh Pourhoseingholi, Mohamad Javad Nouri
{"title":"Determining the optimal leading limb for gait initiation in unilateral transtibial amputees: A systematic review.","authors":"Nahid Tafti, Ensieh Pourhoseingholi, Mohamad Javad Nouri","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The selection of the leading limb during gait initiation in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputations can significantly affect various biomechanical parameters. However, there is currently no established recommendation for the suitable leading limb in this population. The systematic review was aimed to propose a preferred leading limb for gait initiation in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputations based on biomechanical parameters. Databases including Google Scholar, PubMed, Science Direct, and ISI Web of Knowledge, were searched. The first selection criterion was based on abstracts and titles to address the research question. A total of seven studies were included in this review, and the Downs and Black's checklist was used by three researchers to assess the risk of bias. The review included a total of 61 adults with unilateral transtibial amputations, with a mean age range of 41 to 64.43 years. The confidence level of the included studies was poor, and the observational cohort was the most common study design (n = 5). Most of the studies were not replicable. Four of the included studies recommended the prosthetic limb as the preferred leading limb. Individuals with unilateral transtibial amputations may experience biomechanical benefits, including a more normal center of pressure path, reduced limb loading, and increased ankle energy generation, when leading with their prosthetic limb during gait initiation. However, further research is necessary to establish a more conclusive recommendation for the preferred leading limb in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000363","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The selection of the leading limb during gait initiation in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputations can significantly affect various biomechanical parameters. However, there is currently no established recommendation for the suitable leading limb in this population. The systematic review was aimed to propose a preferred leading limb for gait initiation in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputations based on biomechanical parameters. Databases including Google Scholar, PubMed, Science Direct, and ISI Web of Knowledge, were searched. The first selection criterion was based on abstracts and titles to address the research question. A total of seven studies were included in this review, and the Downs and Black's checklist was used by three researchers to assess the risk of bias. The review included a total of 61 adults with unilateral transtibial amputations, with a mean age range of 41 to 64.43 years. The confidence level of the included studies was poor, and the observational cohort was the most common study design (n = 5). Most of the studies were not replicable. Four of the included studies recommended the prosthetic limb as the preferred leading limb. Individuals with unilateral transtibial amputations may experience biomechanical benefits, including a more normal center of pressure path, reduced limb loading, and increased ankle energy generation, when leading with their prosthetic limb during gait initiation. However, further research is necessary to establish a more conclusive recommendation for the preferred leading limb in this population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定单侧经胫截肢者开始步态的最佳前肢:系统综述。
单侧经胫骨截肢者在步态开始时选择主导肢体会对各种生物力学参数产生重大影响。然而,目前还没有针对这一人群的合适主导肢体的既定建议。该系统性综述旨在根据生物力学参数,为单侧经胫骨截肢者的步态启动提出首选前肢。研究人员对谷歌学术、PubMed、Science Direct 和 ISI Web of Knowledge 等数据库进行了检索。第一个选择标准是根据摘要和标题来解决研究问题。共有七项研究被纳入本综述,三位研究人员使用了唐斯和布莱克的检查表来评估偏倚风险。该综述共纳入 61 名单侧经胫骨截肢的成人,平均年龄为 41 岁至 64.43 岁。纳入研究的可信度较低,观察性队列是最常见的研究设计(n = 5)。大多数研究无法重复。所纳入的研究中有四项建议将假肢作为首选的主导肢体。单侧经胫骨截肢者在步态起始阶段使用假肢前导可能会带来生物力学方面的益处,包括压力中心路径更正常、肢体负荷减轻以及踝关节能量生成增加。然而,要为这一人群首选的主导肢体确立更具决定性的建议,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.
期刊最新文献
An environmental scan of limb loss rehabilitation centers across Canada. Design of a custom metamaterial insert for improved pressure distribution within transtibial prosthetic sockets. Effects of a low-cost prosthetic knee on amputee gait over uneven and even terrains. Time to successful outcome vs. treatment duration in cranial remolding orthosis treatment. Is biomechanical loading reduced in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation during fast-paced walking when using different ankle/foot prostheses? A pragmatic randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1