Angiographic Safety and Efficacy of the ReSolv Flow-Diverting Stent in a Rabbit Model.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Interventional Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1177/15910199241260896
Rosalie Ea Morrish, Alec T Chunta, Brooke L Belanger, Paige M Croney, M Suheel Abdul Salam, Crista Thompson, Muneer Eesa, John H Wong, Alim P Mitha
{"title":"Angiographic Safety and Efficacy of the ReSolv Flow-Diverting Stent in a Rabbit Model.","authors":"Rosalie Ea Morrish, Alec T Chunta, Brooke L Belanger, Paige M Croney, M Suheel Abdul Salam, Crista Thompson, Muneer Eesa, John H Wong, Alim P Mitha","doi":"10.1177/15910199241260896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bioresorbable polymer-based flow-diverting stents have potential benefits over existing metal devices. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the novel ReSolv device, which is a primarily polymer-based flow-diverting stent, using the in vivo rabbit sidewall saccular aneurysm model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ReSolv stents were deployed in 14 New Zealand White rabbits that had undergone aneurysm creation procedures. Animals were allocated to follow-up time points of 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 16, or 18 months. Angiographic images were evaluated by an independent neurointerventionalist blinded to follow-up time points for (1) in-stent stenosis, (2) parent vessel and jailed side branch patency, (3) wall apposition, and (4) aneurysm occlusion using the Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification (RROC), O'Kelly Marotta grading scale, and the 4F flow diversion predictive score. Primary efficacy outcome was defined as RROC Class I or II.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a median follow-up time of 7.5 months, parent vessel (14/14) and jailed side (33/33) branches were patent in all cases. There was no development of thrombus on the stent or cases of significant in-stent stenosis, and all stents had good wall apposition. Adequate occlusion was found in 85.7% (<i>n</i> = 12) of animals, including an RROC Class I in 64.3% (<i>n</i> = 9) and RROC Class II in 21.4% (<i>n</i> = 3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ReSolv stent shows encouraging angiographic safety and efficacy outcomes after placement in a rabbit sidewall saccular aneurysm model. Longer term studies are ongoing to determine eventual fate of the aneurysm, parent vessel, and jailed side branches after absorption of the polymer component of the stent.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199241260896"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571144/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241260896","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bioresorbable polymer-based flow-diverting stents have potential benefits over existing metal devices. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the novel ReSolv device, which is a primarily polymer-based flow-diverting stent, using the in vivo rabbit sidewall saccular aneurysm model.

Methods: ReSolv stents were deployed in 14 New Zealand White rabbits that had undergone aneurysm creation procedures. Animals were allocated to follow-up time points of 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 16, or 18 months. Angiographic images were evaluated by an independent neurointerventionalist blinded to follow-up time points for (1) in-stent stenosis, (2) parent vessel and jailed side branch patency, (3) wall apposition, and (4) aneurysm occlusion using the Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification (RROC), O'Kelly Marotta grading scale, and the 4F flow diversion predictive score. Primary efficacy outcome was defined as RROC Class I or II.

Results: At a median follow-up time of 7.5 months, parent vessel (14/14) and jailed side (33/33) branches were patent in all cases. There was no development of thrombus on the stent or cases of significant in-stent stenosis, and all stents had good wall apposition. Adequate occlusion was found in 85.7% (n = 12) of animals, including an RROC Class I in 64.3% (n = 9) and RROC Class II in 21.4% (n = 3).

Conclusions: The ReSolv stent shows encouraging angiographic safety and efficacy outcomes after placement in a rabbit sidewall saccular aneurysm model. Longer term studies are ongoing to determine eventual fate of the aneurysm, parent vessel, and jailed side branches after absorption of the polymer component of the stent.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ReSolv 分流支架在兔模型中的血管造影安全性和有效性
背景:与现有的金属设备相比,基于生物可吸收聚合物的导流支架具有潜在的优势。本研究旨在使用体内兔侧壁囊状动脉瘤模型评估新型 ReSolv 装置的安全性和有效性:方法:将 ReSolv 支架植入 14 只接受过动脉瘤创建手术的新西兰白兔体内。动物被分配到 1、3、6、9、12、16 或 18 个月的随访时间点。血管造影图像由一名独立的神经介入专家使用雷蒙德-罗伊闭塞分类法(Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification,RROC)、O'Kelly Marotta 分级法和 4F 血流分流预测评分进行评估,评估内容包括:(1) 支架内狭窄;(2) 母血管和狱侧支通畅;(3) 壁贴合;(4) 动脉瘤闭塞。主要疗效结果定义为 RROC I 级或 II 级:中位随访时间为 7.5 个月,所有病例的母血管(14/14)和狱侧(33/33)分支均通畅。支架上没有出现血栓,也没有出现明显的支架内狭窄,所有支架的壁贴合良好。85.7%(12 例)的动物发现了充分闭塞,其中 64.3%(9 例)为 RROC I 级,21.4%(3 例)为 RROC II 级:ReSolv支架在兔侧壁囊状动脉瘤模型中置入后,血管造影安全性和疗效令人鼓舞。目前正在进行更长期的研究,以确定支架的聚合物成分被吸收后,动脉瘤、母血管和被囚禁侧支的最终命运。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
期刊最新文献
Circulating miRNA profiles as predictive biomarkers for aneurysm healing following endovascular treatment: a prospective study. "Chopperlysis": The effect of helicopter transport on reperfusion and outcomes in large vessel occlusion strokes. DWI lesions after intracranial aneurysm treatment with contour or WEB-does the device matter? Analysis of selective neurocritical care admission costs following elective endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Recognition of dural to pial supply in high-grade dural arteriovenous fistula: A technical note.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1