Ahmed Abdelsalam, Hayes B Fountain, Ian A Ramsay, Evan M Luther, Mohammad Mahdi Sowlat, Michael A Silva, Ameer E Hassan, Aman B Patel, Tiffany Eatz, Pradeep Joseph, Robert W Regenhardt, Sudhakar R Satti, Adnan H Siddiqui, Sai Sanikommu, Ammad A Baig, Priyank Khandelwal, Alejandro M Spiotta, Robert M Starke
{"title":"First multicenter study evaluating the utility of the BENCHMARK<sup>TM</sup> BMX<sup>TM</sup> 81 large-bore access catheter in neurovascular interventions.","authors":"Ahmed Abdelsalam, Hayes B Fountain, Ian A Ramsay, Evan M Luther, Mohammad Mahdi Sowlat, Michael A Silva, Ameer E Hassan, Aman B Patel, Tiffany Eatz, Pradeep Joseph, Robert W Regenhardt, Sudhakar R Satti, Adnan H Siddiqui, Sai Sanikommu, Ammad A Baig, Priyank Khandelwal, Alejandro M Spiotta, Robert M Starke","doi":"10.1177/15910199241262848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study is the first multicentric report on the safety, efficacy, and technical performance of utilizing a large bore (0.081″ inner diameter) access catheter in neurovascular interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were retrospectively collected from seven sites in the United States for neurovascular procedures via large bore 0.081″ inner diameter access catheter (Benchmark BMX81, Penumbra, Inc.). The primary outcome was technical success, defined as the access catheter reaching its target vessel. Safety outcomes included periprocedural device-related and access site complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 90 consecutive patients included. The median age of the patients was 63 years (IQR: 53, 68); 53% were female. The most common interventions were aneurysm embolization (33.3%), carotid stenting (12.2%), and arteriovenous malformation embolization (11.1%). The transradial approach was most used (56.7%), followed by transfemoral (41.1%). Challenging anatomic variations included severe vessel tortuosity (8/90, 8.9%), type 2 aortic arch (7/90, 7.8%), type 3 aortic arch (2/90, 2.2%), bovine arch (2/90, 2.2%), and severe angle (<30°) between the subclavian artery and target vessel (1/90, 1.1%). Technical success was achieved in 98.9% of the cases (89/90), with six cases requiring a switch from radial to femoral (6.7%) and one case from femoral to radial (1.1%). There were no access site complications or complications related to the 0.081″ catheter. Two postprocedural complications occurred (2.2%), unrelated to the access catheter.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The BMX™ 81 large-bore access catheters was safe and effective in both radial and femoral access across a wide range of neurovascular procedures, achieving high technical success without any access site or device-related complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199241262848"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571168/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241262848","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: This study is the first multicentric report on the safety, efficacy, and technical performance of utilizing a large bore (0.081″ inner diameter) access catheter in neurovascular interventions.
Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from seven sites in the United States for neurovascular procedures via large bore 0.081″ inner diameter access catheter (Benchmark BMX81, Penumbra, Inc.). The primary outcome was technical success, defined as the access catheter reaching its target vessel. Safety outcomes included periprocedural device-related and access site complications.
Results: There were 90 consecutive patients included. The median age of the patients was 63 years (IQR: 53, 68); 53% were female. The most common interventions were aneurysm embolization (33.3%), carotid stenting (12.2%), and arteriovenous malformation embolization (11.1%). The transradial approach was most used (56.7%), followed by transfemoral (41.1%). Challenging anatomic variations included severe vessel tortuosity (8/90, 8.9%), type 2 aortic arch (7/90, 7.8%), type 3 aortic arch (2/90, 2.2%), bovine arch (2/90, 2.2%), and severe angle (<30°) between the subclavian artery and target vessel (1/90, 1.1%). Technical success was achieved in 98.9% of the cases (89/90), with six cases requiring a switch from radial to femoral (6.7%) and one case from femoral to radial (1.1%). There were no access site complications or complications related to the 0.081″ catheter. Two postprocedural complications occurred (2.2%), unrelated to the access catheter.
Conclusion: The BMX™ 81 large-bore access catheters was safe and effective in both radial and femoral access across a wide range of neurovascular procedures, achieving high technical success without any access site or device-related complications.
期刊介绍:
Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...