Outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage: A multicenter study from India (with video).

IF 2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Indian Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1007/s12664-024-01614-1
Radhika Chavan, Vikas Singla, Sridhar Sundaram, Shankar Zanwar, Chirag Shah, Sukrit Sud, Pankaj Singh, Chaiti Gandhi, Pratin Bhatt, Akash Goel, Sanjay Rajput
{"title":"Outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage: A multicenter study from India (with video).","authors":"Radhika Chavan, Vikas Singla, Sridhar Sundaram, Shankar Zanwar, Chirag Shah, Sukrit Sud, Pankaj Singh, Chaiti Gandhi, Pratin Bhatt, Akash Goel, Sanjay Rajput","doi":"10.1007/s12664-024-01614-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) offers a safe and minimally invasive alternative for percutaneous cholecystostomy (PCC) in acute cholecystitis patients with high-surgical risk. Additionally, EUS-GBD serves as a rescue biliary drainage in malignant distal biliary obstruction. Despite its widespread application, data within the Indian context remains sparse. This study aims to report the outcomes of EUS-GBD through the first multi-center study from India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing EUS-GBD at six tertiary care centers of India from March 2022 to November 2023. EUS-GBD was performed by free hand or over-the-guidewire technique with lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) or large caliber metal stent (LCMS). The primary outcome was technical success (defined as successful deployment of stent between gallbladder and stomach/duodenal lumen). The secondary outcomes were clinical success (defined as resolution of symptoms of acute cholecystitis and more than > 50% reduction in bilirubin level within two weeks in distal biliary obstruction), adverse event rate, 30-day mortality rate and 90-day reintervention rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total 29 patients (mean age 65.86 ± 12.91, 11 female) underwent EUS-GBD. The indication for EUS-GBD were acute cholecystitis (79.31%) and rescue biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction (20.69%). LAMS was deployed in 92.86%, predominantly by free-hand technique (78.57%). Technical and clinical success rates were 96.55% and 82.75%, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 27.59% patients, with severe adverse events (bile leak and bleeding) being uncommon (10%). Both 30-day mortality rate and 90-day reintervention rate were 13.79% in patients. Cholecysto-duodenal fistula facilitated cholecystoscopic intervention and stone removal in one patient and transgastric EUS-GBD did not hamper bilio-enteric anastomosis during Whipple surgery in two patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EUS-GBD is a safe and effective technique for managing acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients and for biliary drainage in cases with malignant distal biliary obstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":13404,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"1184-1193"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-024-01614-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) offers a safe and minimally invasive alternative for percutaneous cholecystostomy (PCC) in acute cholecystitis patients with high-surgical risk. Additionally, EUS-GBD serves as a rescue biliary drainage in malignant distal biliary obstruction. Despite its widespread application, data within the Indian context remains sparse. This study aims to report the outcomes of EUS-GBD through the first multi-center study from India.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing EUS-GBD at six tertiary care centers of India from March 2022 to November 2023. EUS-GBD was performed by free hand or over-the-guidewire technique with lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) or large caliber metal stent (LCMS). The primary outcome was technical success (defined as successful deployment of stent between gallbladder and stomach/duodenal lumen). The secondary outcomes were clinical success (defined as resolution of symptoms of acute cholecystitis and more than > 50% reduction in bilirubin level within two weeks in distal biliary obstruction), adverse event rate, 30-day mortality rate and 90-day reintervention rate.

Results: Total 29 patients (mean age 65.86 ± 12.91, 11 female) underwent EUS-GBD. The indication for EUS-GBD were acute cholecystitis (79.31%) and rescue biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction (20.69%). LAMS was deployed in 92.86%, predominantly by free-hand technique (78.57%). Technical and clinical success rates were 96.55% and 82.75%, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 27.59% patients, with severe adverse events (bile leak and bleeding) being uncommon (10%). Both 30-day mortality rate and 90-day reintervention rate were 13.79% in patients. Cholecysto-duodenal fistula facilitated cholecystoscopic intervention and stone removal in one patient and transgastric EUS-GBD did not hamper bilio-enteric anastomosis during Whipple surgery in two patients.

Conclusion: EUS-GBD is a safe and effective technique for managing acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients and for biliary drainage in cases with malignant distal biliary obstruction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内镜超声引导下胆囊引流术的效果:印度多中心研究(附视频)。
背景:内镜超声引导胆囊引流术(EUS-GBD)为手术风险较高的急性胆囊炎患者提供了安全、微创的经皮胆囊造口术(PCC)替代方案。此外,EUS-GBD 还可作为恶性远端胆道梗阻的抢救性胆道引流术。尽管 EUS-GBD 应用广泛,但在印度的数据仍然很少。本研究旨在通过印度首个多中心研究报告 EUS-GBD 的结果:我们回顾性分析了 2022 年 3 月至 2023 年 11 月期间在印度六家三级医疗中心接受 EUS-GBD 的患者。EUS-GBD 采用徒手或导丝上方技术,使用管腔贴合金属支架(LAMS)或大口径金属支架(LCMS)。主要结果是技术成功率(定义为在胆囊和胃/十二指肠腔之间成功部署支架)。次要结果是临床成功率(定义为急性胆囊炎症状缓解,远端胆道梗阻患者胆红素水平在两周内下降超过 50%)、不良事件发生率、30 天死亡率和 90 天再介入率:共有 29 名患者(平均年龄 65.86 ± 12.91 岁,女性 11 人)接受了 EUS-GBD 治疗。EUS-GBD 的适应症为急性胆囊炎(79.31%)和恶性远端胆道梗阻的抢救性胆道引流(20.69%)。92.86%的患者进行了 LAMS 部署,主要采用徒手技术(78.57%)。技术和临床成功率分别为 96.55% 和 82.75%。27.59%的患者发生了不良事件,其中严重不良事件(胆汁渗漏和出血)并不常见(10%)。患者的 30 天死亡率和 90 天再介入率均为 13.79%。一名患者的胆囊十二指肠瘘促进了胆囊镜介入治疗和结石清除,两名患者的经胃EUS-GBD没有妨碍Whipple手术中的胆肠吻合术:结论:EUS-GBD 是治疗高危患者急性胆囊炎和恶性远端胆道梗阻患者胆道引流的一种安全有效的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Gastroenterology aims to help doctors everywhere practise better medicine and to influence the debate on gastroenterology. To achieve these aims, we publish original scientific studies, state-of -the-art special articles, reports and papers commenting on the clinical, scientific and public health factors affecting aspects of gastroenterology. We shall be delighted to receive articles for publication in all of these categories and letters commenting on the contents of the Journal or on issues of interest to our readers.
期刊最新文献
Transfusion-related lung complications are uncommon in non-ventilated liver failure patients undergoing low-volume plasma exchange. Esophagitis dissecans superficialis - An intimidating, but innocuous condition. Gastroparesis in a patient with benign joint hypermobility syndrome. Remitting seronegative symmetrical synovitis with pitting edema: An unusual paraneoplastic manifestation of metastatic gastrointestinal cancer. Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction- Is esophageal manometry enough to diagnose and treat?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1