PyFaceWipe: a new defacing tool for almost any MRI contrast.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1007/s10334-024-01170-x
Stanislaw Mitew, Ling Yun Yeow, Chi Long Ho, Prakash K N Bhanu, Oliver James Nickalls
{"title":"PyFaceWipe: a new defacing tool for almost any MRI contrast.","authors":"Stanislaw Mitew, Ling Yun Yeow, Chi Long Ho, Prakash K N Bhanu, Oliver James Nickalls","doi":"10.1007/s10334-024-01170-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>Defacing research MRI brain scans is often a mandatory step. With current defacing software, there are issues with Windows compatibility and researcher doubt regarding the adequacy of preservation of brain voxels in non-T1w scans. To address this, we developed PyFaceWipe, a multiplatform software for multiple MRI contrasts, which was evaluated based on its anonymisation ability and effect on downstream processing.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Multiple MRI brain scan contrasts from the OASIS-3 dataset were defaced with PyFaceWipe and PyDeface and manually assessed for brain voxel preservation, remnant facial features and effect on automated face detection. Original and PyFaceWipe-defaced data from locally acquired T1w structural scans underwent volumetry with FastSurfer and brain atlas generation with ANTS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>214 MRI scans of several contrasts from OASIS-3 were successfully processed with both PyFaceWipe and PyDeface. PyFaceWipe maintained complete brain voxel preservation in all tested contrasts except ASL (45%) and DWI (90%), and PyDeface in all tested contrasts except ASL (95%), BOLD (25%), DWI (40%) and T2* (25%). Manual review of PyFaceWipe showed no failures of facial feature removal. Pinna removal was less successful (6% of T1 scans showed residual complete pinna). PyDeface achieved 5.1% failure rate. Automated detection found no faces in PyFaceWipe-defaced scans, 19 faces in PyDeface scans compared with 78 from the 224 original scans. Brain atlas generation showed no significant difference between atlases created from original and defaced data in both young adulthood and late elderly cohorts. Structural volumetry dice scores were ≥ 0.98 for all structures except for grey matter which had 0.93. PyFaceWipe output was identical across the tested operating systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PyFaceWipe is a promising multiplatform defacing tool, demonstrating excellent brain voxel preservation and competitive defacing in multiple MRI contrasts, performing favourably against PyDeface. ASL, BOLD, DWI and T2* scans did not produce recognisable 3D renders and hence should not require defacing. Structural volumetry dice scores (≥ 0.98) were higher than previously published FreeSurfer results, except for grey matter which were comparable. The effect is measurable and care should be exercised during studies. ANTS atlas creation showed no significant effect from PyFaceWipe defacing.</p>","PeriodicalId":18067,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"993-1003"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-024-01170-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: Defacing research MRI brain scans is often a mandatory step. With current defacing software, there are issues with Windows compatibility and researcher doubt regarding the adequacy of preservation of brain voxels in non-T1w scans. To address this, we developed PyFaceWipe, a multiplatform software for multiple MRI contrasts, which was evaluated based on its anonymisation ability and effect on downstream processing.

Materials and methods: Multiple MRI brain scan contrasts from the OASIS-3 dataset were defaced with PyFaceWipe and PyDeface and manually assessed for brain voxel preservation, remnant facial features and effect on automated face detection. Original and PyFaceWipe-defaced data from locally acquired T1w structural scans underwent volumetry with FastSurfer and brain atlas generation with ANTS.

Results: 214 MRI scans of several contrasts from OASIS-3 were successfully processed with both PyFaceWipe and PyDeface. PyFaceWipe maintained complete brain voxel preservation in all tested contrasts except ASL (45%) and DWI (90%), and PyDeface in all tested contrasts except ASL (95%), BOLD (25%), DWI (40%) and T2* (25%). Manual review of PyFaceWipe showed no failures of facial feature removal. Pinna removal was less successful (6% of T1 scans showed residual complete pinna). PyDeface achieved 5.1% failure rate. Automated detection found no faces in PyFaceWipe-defaced scans, 19 faces in PyDeface scans compared with 78 from the 224 original scans. Brain atlas generation showed no significant difference between atlases created from original and defaced data in both young adulthood and late elderly cohorts. Structural volumetry dice scores were ≥ 0.98 for all structures except for grey matter which had 0.93. PyFaceWipe output was identical across the tested operating systems.

Conclusion: PyFaceWipe is a promising multiplatform defacing tool, demonstrating excellent brain voxel preservation and competitive defacing in multiple MRI contrasts, performing favourably against PyDeface. ASL, BOLD, DWI and T2* scans did not produce recognisable 3D renders and hence should not require defacing. Structural volumetry dice scores (≥ 0.98) were higher than previously published FreeSurfer results, except for grey matter which were comparable. The effect is measurable and care should be exercised during studies. ANTS atlas creation showed no significant effect from PyFaceWipe defacing.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PyFaceWipe:几乎适用于任何核磁共振成像对比度的全新篡改工具。
理由和目标:对磁共振成像脑部扫描研究进行去污通常是一个强制性步骤。目前的去污软件在 Windows 兼容性方面存在问题,研究人员对非 T1w 扫描中脑部体素的保留是否充分也存在疑问。为了解决这个问题,我们开发了PyFaceWipe,这是一款适用于多种核磁共振成像对比的多平台软件,我们根据其匿名化能力和对下游处理的影响对其进行了评估:使用PyFaceWipe和PyDeface对OASIS-3数据集中的多个磁共振成像脑部扫描对比进行了污损处理,并对脑部体素的保留、面部特征的残留以及对自动人脸检测的影响进行了人工评估。来自本地获取的 T1w 结构扫描的原始数据和经过 PyFaceWipe 处理的数据使用 FastSurfer 进行容积测量,并使用 ANTS 生成脑图集。PyFaceWipe在除ASL(45%)和DWI(90%)之外的所有测试对比中都保持了完整的脑体素保留,而PyDeface在除ASL(95%)、BOLD(25%)、DWI(40%)和T2*(25%)之外的所有测试对比中都保持了完整的脑体素保留。对 PyFaceWipe 的手动审查显示,面部特征去除没有失败。耳廓去除不太成功(6% 的 T1 扫描显示残留完整耳廓)。PyDeface 的失败率为 5.1%。自动检测在 PyFaceWipe 剔除的扫描中没有发现人脸,在 PyDeface 扫描中发现了 19 个人脸,而在 224 个原始扫描中发现了 78 个人脸。根据原始数据生成的脑图谱与根据篡改数据生成的脑图谱在青年组和老年组中没有明显差异。除灰质的骰子分数为 0.93 外,所有结构的结构容积骰子分数均≥ 0.98。PyFaceWipe 的输出在测试的操作系统中完全相同:PyFaceWipe是一种很有前途的多平台去污工具,在多种核磁共振成像对比中显示出出色的脑体素保留和有竞争力的去污能力,其表现优于PyDeface。ASL、BOLD、DWI 和 T2* 扫描没有产生可识别的 3D 渲染,因此不需要去污。结构容积骰子分数(≥ 0.98)高于之前公布的 FreeSurfer 结果,但灰质除外,两者不相上下。这种影响是可以测量的,在研究过程中应小心谨慎。ANTS 图集创建显示 PyFaceWipe 去污没有明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: MAGMA is a multidisciplinary international journal devoted to the publication of articles on all aspects of magnetic resonance techniques and their applications in medicine and biology. MAGMA currently publishes research papers, reviews, letters to the editor, and commentaries, six times a year. The subject areas covered by MAGMA include: advances in materials, hardware and software in magnetic resonance technology, new developments and results in research and practical applications of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy related to biology and medicine, study of animal models and intact cells using magnetic resonance, reports of clinical trials on humans and clinical validation of magnetic resonance protocols.
期刊最新文献
Development of a cost-effective 3D-printed MRI phantom for enhanced teaching of system performance and image quality concepts. FeCl3 and GdCl3 solutions as superfast relaxation modifiers for agarose gel: a quantitative analysis. Correction to: Motion robust coronary MR angiography using zigzag centric ky-kz trajectory and high-resolution deep learning reconstruction. Quantitative MRI methods for the assessment of structure, composition, and function of musculoskeletal tissues in basic research and preclinical applications. PyFaceWipe: a new defacing tool for almost any MRI contrast.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1