Outcomes of Femoral Popliteal Bypass in Octogenarians.

Abstract

Introduction: Femoral-popliteal bypass (FPB) surgery is a common lower extremity revascularization procedure. As the population continues to age, this procedure is being performed increasingly on older patients. This study investigated whether outcomes differ in this population.

Materials and methods: Patients over and less than 80 years old who underwent FPB between 2009-2013 were queried using an existing hospital registry. Demographics, comorbidities, intraoperative complications, perioperative outcomes, and two-year patencies were compared.

Results: Twenty-four patients in the octogenarian cohort (OC) and 72 patients in the non-octogenarian cohort (NOC) were identified. There was a lower prevalence of smoking (p=0.018) and higher prevalence of hypertension (p=0.021) among octogenarians. Other medical characteristics were similar (p<0.05). There were no differences in use of vein versus PTFE (p=0.002) as a conduit, or above (OC 20.0% vs. NOC 36.7%), versus below knee (OC 80.0% vs. NOC 63.3%) distal anastomosis (p>0.05) between the groups. There was a difference (p<0.01) in indication for procedure (OC/NOC): claudication (0%/44%), limb salvage (71%/31%), and rest pain (29%/25%). There were no differences in 30-day readmissions (17% vs. 21%; p=0.59) or incidence of postoperative (25% vs. 19%; p=0.56) or intraoperative complications (8.3% vs. 4.2%; p=0.52). Length of stay (LOS) was longer and statistically significant in octogenarians (12 days vs. 7 days; p=0.032) and remained significant after multivariate linear regression (p=0.015). Patencies in OC were lower and dropped faster after six months; however, there were no statistically significant differences in patencies at any time interval (p>0.05). The position of the distal anastomosis relative to the knee, conduit type, and indication were not independently predictive of patency outcomes (p>0.05).

Conclusion: The safety and efficacy of FPB in octogenarians is similar to the general population despite LOS in octogenarians being 5.98 days longer. While the difference in indication suggests that vascular surgeons are more conservative in treating octogenarians, our analysis did not reveal significant differences between populations and suggests that lower extremity bypass can be performed safely with comparable results in this cohort. A larger cohort is needed to validate these results.