Dyspnea and Palliative Care in Advanced Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Rapid Review.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1097/NJH.0000000000001042
Sarah N Miller, Elizabeth Higgins, Joan Cain, Patrick Coyne, Robert Peacock, Ayaba Logan, Tracy Fasolino, Kathleen Oare Lindell
{"title":"Dyspnea and Palliative Care in Advanced Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Rapid Review.","authors":"Sarah N Miller, Elizabeth Higgins, Joan Cain, Patrick Coyne, Robert Peacock, Ayaba Logan, Tracy Fasolino, Kathleen Oare Lindell","doi":"10.1097/NJH.0000000000001042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dyspnea is the most common and activity-limiting symptom for those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Treatment is complex, palliative care (PC) dyspnea relief interventions are poorly understood, and PC remains underutilized in COPD despite national guidelines and recommendations. The purpose of this rapid review was to explore the concept of dyspnea and role of PC through the lens of providers, caregivers, and patients with COPD. A systematic approach for synthesis was used to identify 13 articles published between January 2018 and October 2023. Team members compared data via visualization and theme clustering to identify key conclusions describing operationalization of dyspnea, management, and PC implications. Dyspnea operationalization was challenging, with inconsistent measurement and terminology. Dyspnea was a significant burden in COPD and contributed to complexity of treatment. Opioids were used most often to treat dyspnea, but provider perspectives and biases can influence treatment decisions and perceptions of opioid therapy by the patient and caregiver. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines and policies are needed to clarify the use of opioid therapy for dyspnea management to reduce stigmatization and barriers to treatment. Provider education should emphasize a multipronged approach to treatment of dyspnea in COPD with integration of PC early in the care continuum.</p>","PeriodicalId":54807,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NJH.0000000000001042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dyspnea is the most common and activity-limiting symptom for those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Treatment is complex, palliative care (PC) dyspnea relief interventions are poorly understood, and PC remains underutilized in COPD despite national guidelines and recommendations. The purpose of this rapid review was to explore the concept of dyspnea and role of PC through the lens of providers, caregivers, and patients with COPD. A systematic approach for synthesis was used to identify 13 articles published between January 2018 and October 2023. Team members compared data via visualization and theme clustering to identify key conclusions describing operationalization of dyspnea, management, and PC implications. Dyspnea operationalization was challenging, with inconsistent measurement and terminology. Dyspnea was a significant burden in COPD and contributed to complexity of treatment. Opioids were used most often to treat dyspnea, but provider perspectives and biases can influence treatment decisions and perceptions of opioid therapy by the patient and caregiver. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines and policies are needed to clarify the use of opioid therapy for dyspnea management to reduce stigmatization and barriers to treatment. Provider education should emphasize a multipronged approach to treatment of dyspnea in COPD with integration of PC early in the care continuum.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚期慢性阻塞性肺病中的呼吸困难和姑息治疗:快速回顾。
呼吸困难是慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者最常见的症状,也是限制患者活动的症状。治疗方法复杂,姑息治疗(PC)缓解呼吸困难的干预措施鲜为人知,尽管有国家指南和建议,但 PC 在慢性阻塞性肺病中的应用仍然不足。本次快速综述的目的是通过慢性阻塞性肺病患者的医疗服务提供者、护理人员和患者的视角,探讨呼吸困难的概念和姑息治疗的作用。我们采用系统的方法进行了综合,确定了 2018 年 1 月至 2023 年 10 月间发表的 13 篇文章。团队成员通过可视化和主题聚类对数据进行比较,以确定描述呼吸困难操作化、管理和 PC 影响的关键结论。呼吸困难的操作化具有挑战性,测量方法和术语不一致。呼吸困难是慢性阻塞性肺病的一个重要负担,并导致治疗的复杂性。阿片类药物最常用于治疗呼吸困难,但医护人员的观点和偏见会影响治疗决策以及患者和护理人员对阿片类药物治疗的看法。有必要制定以证据为基础的临床实践指南和政策,明确在呼吸困难治疗中使用阿片类药物治疗的方法,以减少污名化和治疗障碍。医疗服务提供者教育应强调多管齐下的慢性阻塞性肺病呼吸困难治疗方法,并在治疗的早期阶段将 PC 纳入其中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing (JHPN) is the official journal of the Hospice & Palliative Nurses Association and is the professional, peer-reviewed journal for nurses in hospice and palliative care settings. Focusing on the clinical, educational and research aspects of care, JHPN offers current and reliable information on end of life nursing. Feature articles in areas such as symptom management, ethics, and futility of care address holistic care across the continuum. Book and article reviews, clinical updates and case studies create a journal that meets the didactic and practical needs of the nurse caring for patients with serious illnesses in advanced stages.
期刊最新文献
Association News. Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association Position Statement: Medical Aid in Dying. Improving Patient-Centered Care for End-Stage Renal Disease Patients at a Community Palliative Setting. The Impact of Allyship on Minoritized Patients and Providers in Palliative Practice. True North.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1