Assessment of spinal alignment in standing position using Biplanar X-ray images and three-dimensional vertebral models.

Porto biomedical journal Pub Date : 2024-06-20 eCollection Date: 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000256
Koichi Kobayashi, Makoto Sakamoto, Keisuke Sasagawa, Masaaki Nakai, Masashi Okamoto, Kazuhiro Hasegawa, Kengo Narita
{"title":"Assessment of spinal alignment in standing position using Biplanar X-ray images and three-dimensional vertebral models.","authors":"Koichi Kobayashi, Makoto Sakamoto, Keisuke Sasagawa, Masaaki Nakai, Masashi Okamoto, Kazuhiro Hasegawa, Kengo Narita","doi":"10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We developed two methods for three-dimensional (3D) evaluation of spinal alignment in standing position by image matching between biplanar x-ray images and 3D vertebral models. One used a Slot-Scanning 3D x-ray Imager (sterEOS) to obtain biplanar x-ray images, and the other used a conventional x-ray system and a rotating table. The 3D vertebral model was constructed from the CT scan data. The spatial position of the vertebral model was determined by minimizing the contour difference between the projected image of the model and the biplanar x-ray images. Verification experiments were conducted using a torso phantom. The relative positions of the upper vertebrae to the lowest vertebrae of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar vertebrae were evaluated. The mean, standard deviation, and mean square error of the relative position were less than 1° and 1 mm in all cases for sterEOS. The maximum mean squared errors of the conventional x-ray system and the rotating table were 0.7° and 0.4 mm for the cervical spine, 1.0° and 1.2 mm for the thoracic spine, and 1.1° and 1.2 mm for the lumbar spine. Therefore, both methods could be useful for evaluating the spinal alignment in standing position.</p>","PeriodicalId":74479,"journal":{"name":"Porto biomedical journal","volume":"9 3","pages":"256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11186800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Porto biomedical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We developed two methods for three-dimensional (3D) evaluation of spinal alignment in standing position by image matching between biplanar x-ray images and 3D vertebral models. One used a Slot-Scanning 3D x-ray Imager (sterEOS) to obtain biplanar x-ray images, and the other used a conventional x-ray system and a rotating table. The 3D vertebral model was constructed from the CT scan data. The spatial position of the vertebral model was determined by minimizing the contour difference between the projected image of the model and the biplanar x-ray images. Verification experiments were conducted using a torso phantom. The relative positions of the upper vertebrae to the lowest vertebrae of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar vertebrae were evaluated. The mean, standard deviation, and mean square error of the relative position were less than 1° and 1 mm in all cases for sterEOS. The maximum mean squared errors of the conventional x-ray system and the rotating table were 0.7° and 0.4 mm for the cervical spine, 1.0° and 1.2 mm for the thoracic spine, and 1.1° and 1.2 mm for the lumbar spine. Therefore, both methods could be useful for evaluating the spinal alignment in standing position.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用双平面 X 光图像和三维脊椎模型评估站立姿势下的脊椎排列。
我们开发了两种方法,通过双平面 X 光图像和三维脊椎模型之间的图像匹配,对站立姿势下的脊椎排列进行三维(3D)评估。一种方法使用槽扫描三维 X 射线成像仪(sterEOS)获取双平面 X 射线图像,另一种方法使用传统 X 射线系统和旋转台。三维椎体模型是根据 CT 扫描数据构建的。脊椎模型的空间位置是通过最小化模型投影图像与双平面 X 光图像之间的轮廓差来确定的。使用躯干模型进行了验证实验。评估了颈椎、胸椎和腰椎上部椎体与最低椎体的相对位置。在所有情况下,sterEOS 相对位置的平均值、标准偏差和均方误差均小于 1° 和 1 毫米。传统 X 光系统和旋转台的最大均方误差分别为:颈椎 0.7°和 0.4 毫米,胸椎 1.0°和 1.2 毫米,腰椎 1.1°和 1.2 毫米。因此,这两种方法都可用于评估站立姿势下的脊柱排列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From the armchair to contemporary cardiac rehabilitation: the remarkable ongoing journey of exercise training in ischemic heart disease. Serum total bilirubin is a risk factor of metabolic syndrome and its components in obese Egyptians. Emerging perspectives in the management of IgA nephropathy: a comprehensive review. Microbiological profile and antibiotic susceptibility profile of urine cultures in patients with spinal cord injury-retrospective study. Rare extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma: a diagnostic challenge and therapeutic approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1