A pharmacoepidemiological nested case-control study of risk factors for venous thromboembolism with the focus on diabetes, cancer, socioeconomic group, medications, and comorbidities.

Lasse Myllylahti, Leo Niskanen, Riitta Lassila, Jari Haukka
{"title":"A pharmacoepidemiological nested case-control study of risk factors for venous thromboembolism with the focus on diabetes, cancer, socioeconomic group, medications, and comorbidities.","authors":"Lasse Myllylahti, Leo Niskanen, Riitta Lassila, Jari Haukka","doi":"10.1177/14791641241236894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A pharmacoepidemiological study to assess VTE risk factors in a diabetes-rich population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study comprised 299,590 individuals. We observed 3450 VTEs and matched them with 15,875 controls using a nested case-control approach and collected data on comorbidities and prescriptions. By multivariable conditional logistic regression, we calculated ORs with 95%CIs for comorbidities and medications to evaluate their associations with VTE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diabetes (aOR 2.16; 95%CI 1.99-2.34), inflammatory bowel disease (1.84; 1.27-2.66), and severe psychiatric disorders (1.72; 1.43-2.05) had the strongest associations among the non-cancer comorbidities. Pancreatic (12.32; 7.11-21.36), stomach (8.57; 4.07-18.03), lung and bronchus (6.26; 4.16-9.43), and ovarian (6.72; 2.95-15.10) cancers were ranked as high-risk for VTE. Corticosteroids, gabapentinoids, psychotropic drugs, risedronic acid, and pramipexole were most strongly associated (aOR exceeding 1.5) with VTE. Insulin (3.86; 3.33-4.47) and sulphonylureas (2.62; 2.18-3.16) had stronger associations than metformin (1.65; 1.49-1.83). Statins and lercanidipine (0.78; 0.62-0.98) were associated with a lowered risk of VTE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this cohort, with 50% diabetes prevalence, pancreatic, stomach, lung and bronchus, and ovarian cancers were strongly associated with VTE. Corticosteroids, gabapentinoids, and psychotropic medications had the strongest associations with VTE among medications. This may be valuable for generating hypotheses for the further research. Lercanidipine may be a novel protective medication against VTE.</p>","PeriodicalId":93978,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes & vascular disease research","volume":"21 3","pages":"14791641241236894"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11193353/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes & vascular disease research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14791641241236894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: A pharmacoepidemiological study to assess VTE risk factors in a diabetes-rich population.

Methods: The study comprised 299,590 individuals. We observed 3450 VTEs and matched them with 15,875 controls using a nested case-control approach and collected data on comorbidities and prescriptions. By multivariable conditional logistic regression, we calculated ORs with 95%CIs for comorbidities and medications to evaluate their associations with VTE.

Results: Diabetes (aOR 2.16; 95%CI 1.99-2.34), inflammatory bowel disease (1.84; 1.27-2.66), and severe psychiatric disorders (1.72; 1.43-2.05) had the strongest associations among the non-cancer comorbidities. Pancreatic (12.32; 7.11-21.36), stomach (8.57; 4.07-18.03), lung and bronchus (6.26; 4.16-9.43), and ovarian (6.72; 2.95-15.10) cancers were ranked as high-risk for VTE. Corticosteroids, gabapentinoids, psychotropic drugs, risedronic acid, and pramipexole were most strongly associated (aOR exceeding 1.5) with VTE. Insulin (3.86; 3.33-4.47) and sulphonylureas (2.62; 2.18-3.16) had stronger associations than metformin (1.65; 1.49-1.83). Statins and lercanidipine (0.78; 0.62-0.98) were associated with a lowered risk of VTE.

Conclusions: In this cohort, with 50% diabetes prevalence, pancreatic, stomach, lung and bronchus, and ovarian cancers were strongly associated with VTE. Corticosteroids, gabapentinoids, and psychotropic medications had the strongest associations with VTE among medications. This may be valuable for generating hypotheses for the further research. Lercanidipine may be a novel protective medication against VTE.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项关于静脉血栓栓塞风险因素的药物流行病学巢式病例对照研究,重点关注糖尿病、癌症、社会经济群体、药物和合并症。
目标: 一项药物流行病学研究,旨在评估糖尿病患者中的 VTE 风险因素:进行一项药物流行病学研究,以评估糖尿病高发人群中的 VTE 风险因素:研究对象包括 299,590 人。我们观察了 3450 例 VTE 患者,并采用巢式病例对照方法将其与 15875 例对照者进行配对,同时收集了有关合并症和处方的数据。通过多变量条件逻辑回归,我们计算了合并症和药物的ORs及95%CIs,以评估它们与VTE的关系:在非癌症合并症中,糖尿病(aOR 2.16;95%CI 1.99-2.34)、炎症性肠病(1.84;1.27-2.66)和严重精神障碍(1.72;1.43-2.05)的相关性最强。胰腺癌(12.32;7.11-21.36)、胃癌(8.57;4.07-18.03)、肺癌和支气管癌(6.26;4.16-9.43)以及卵巢癌(6.72;2.95-15.10)被列为 VTE 的高危人群。皮质类固醇、加巴喷丁类药物、精神药物、利塞膦酸和普拉克索与 VTE 的关系最为密切(aOR 超过 1.5)。胰岛素(3.86;3.33-4.47)和磺脲类药物(2.62;2.18-3.16)比二甲双胍(1.65;1.49-1.83)的相关性更强。他汀类药物和氯卡尼平(0.78;0.62-0.98)与 VTE 风险降低有关:结论:在这批糖尿病发病率为50%的人群中,胰腺癌、胃癌、肺癌、支气管癌和卵巢癌与VTE密切相关。在各种药物中,皮质类固醇、加巴喷丁类药物和精神药物与 VTE 的相关性最强。这可能有助于为进一步研究提出假设。乐卡地平可能是一种新型的预防 VTE 的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Five-year outcomes of patients with diabetes mellitus treated with a sirolimus-eluting or a biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer. From the SORT OUT VII trial. MicroRNA-451a downregulation in liraglutide-treated individuals with diabetes: A potential cardiovascular protective mechanism. Prevalence and risk factors of retinal vein occlusion in individuals with diabetes: The kailuan eye study. Patient-important outcomes in type 2 diabetes: The paradigm of the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. Association of serum syndecan-1 concentrations with albuminuria in type 2 diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1