How does government climate risk perception affect corporate energy consumption and intensity?

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Energy for Sustainable Development Pub Date : 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1016/j.esd.2024.101496
Minghao Chen, Hongyu Xiao, Liya Li, Nan Li, Lina Liu
{"title":"How does government climate risk perception affect corporate energy consumption and intensity?","authors":"Minghao Chen,&nbsp;Hongyu Xiao,&nbsp;Liya Li,&nbsp;Nan Li,&nbsp;Lina Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.esd.2024.101496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fossil energy consumption is an important factor contributing to global warming, which profoundly impacts healthy economic and social development. Moreover, as a leader in the fight against climate change, the government's climate perception has a crucial influence on the fight against climate change. Based on Chinese government work reports and microlevel enterprise data, this study combines machine learning and text analysis methods to construct a government climate risk perception indicator. The study systematically examines the impact of government climate risk perception on corporate fossil energy consumption and intensity. The results reveal that (1) A 1 % increase in the government's climate risk perception leads to a respective 1.67 % and 1.71 % reduction in corporate energy consumption and energy intensity. (2) A 1 % increase in government climate risk perception corresponds to a 0.274 % increase in environmental regulation, reduces firms' low-quality energy consumption by 0.001 %, and increases firms' high-quality energy consumption by 0.001 %, lowering overall fossil energy consumption. (3) The negative effect of government climate risk perception on fossil energy consumption and intensity is more significant for small-scale firms, firms subject to high environmental regulatory intensity, and dry and wet climate zones. (4) The spatial spillover effect test shows that a 1 % increase in government climate risk perception will reduce neighboring areas' energy consumption by 7.5 %, indicating that government climate risk perception will not only affect local energy consumption, but also affects neighboring areas' energy consumption. Finally, the study presents proposed policy recommendations for governments to navigate climate change risks and facilitate the global energy transition, and achieve sustainable development goals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49209,"journal":{"name":"Energy for Sustainable Development","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 101496"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082624001224","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fossil energy consumption is an important factor contributing to global warming, which profoundly impacts healthy economic and social development. Moreover, as a leader in the fight against climate change, the government's climate perception has a crucial influence on the fight against climate change. Based on Chinese government work reports and microlevel enterprise data, this study combines machine learning and text analysis methods to construct a government climate risk perception indicator. The study systematically examines the impact of government climate risk perception on corporate fossil energy consumption and intensity. The results reveal that (1) A 1 % increase in the government's climate risk perception leads to a respective 1.67 % and 1.71 % reduction in corporate energy consumption and energy intensity. (2) A 1 % increase in government climate risk perception corresponds to a 0.274 % increase in environmental regulation, reduces firms' low-quality energy consumption by 0.001 %, and increases firms' high-quality energy consumption by 0.001 %, lowering overall fossil energy consumption. (3) The negative effect of government climate risk perception on fossil energy consumption and intensity is more significant for small-scale firms, firms subject to high environmental regulatory intensity, and dry and wet climate zones. (4) The spatial spillover effect test shows that a 1 % increase in government climate risk perception will reduce neighboring areas' energy consumption by 7.5 %, indicating that government climate risk perception will not only affect local energy consumption, but also affects neighboring areas' energy consumption. Finally, the study presents proposed policy recommendations for governments to navigate climate change risks and facilitate the global energy transition, and achieve sustainable development goals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政府的气候风险意识如何影响企业的能源消耗和强度?
化石能源消耗是导致全球变暖的重要因素,深刻影响着经济和社会的健康发展。此外,作为应对气候变化的领导者,政府的气候认知对应对气候变化有着至关重要的影响。本研究基于中国政府工作报告和微观企业数据,结合机器学习和文本分析方法,构建了政府气候风险感知指标。研究系统考察了政府气候风险认知对企业化石能源消耗和强度的影响。结果表明:(1)政府气候风险感知每增加 1%,企业能源消耗和能源强度就会分别降低 1.67% 和 1.71%。(2) 政府气候风险认知每增加 1%,环境监管就会增加 0.274%,企业的低质量能源消耗就会减少 0.001%,企业的高质量能源消耗就会增加 0.001%,从而降低总体化石能源消耗。(3)政府气候风险认知对化石能源消耗和强度的负效应在小规模企业、环境监管强度高的企业以及干湿气候区更为显著。(4)空间溢出效应检验表明,政府气候风险认知每增加 1%,邻近地区的能源消耗就会减少 7.5%,说明政府气候风险认知不仅会影响当地的能源消耗,还会影响邻近地区的能源消耗。最后,本研究提出了一些政策建议,以帮助政府应对气候变化风险,促进全球能源转型,实现可持续发展目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy for Sustainable Development
Energy for Sustainable Development ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
187
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the International Energy Initiative, Energy for Sustainable Development is the journal for decision makers, managers, consultants, policy makers, planners and researchers in both government and non-government organizations. It publishes original research and reviews about energy in developing countries, sustainable development, energy resources, technologies, policies and interactions.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Economic Analysis of Bifacial Roof-top PV Systems Development of a comprehensive Rooftop Solar PV Index using DVF framework of Design Thinking Long-range energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions analysis using the LEAP Model: A case study of building ceramic industrial park Assessing greenhouse gas emissions and decarbonization potential of household biogas plant: Nepal's case study Spatial vulnerability of energy poverty among the households in Odisha
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1