Tests of moderation of the big-fish-little-pond effect across students with and without special educational needs in regular versus special education schools

IF 4.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Learning and Instruction Pub Date : 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101966
Annette Lohbeck , William Gilbert , Aleksander Kocaj , Malte Jansen , Alexandre J.S. Morin
{"title":"Tests of moderation of the big-fish-little-pond effect across students with and without special educational needs in regular versus special education schools","authors":"Annette Lohbeck ,&nbsp;William Gilbert ,&nbsp;Aleksander Kocaj ,&nbsp;Malte Jansen ,&nbsp;Alexandre J.S. Morin","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Inclusive education has become increasingly popular based on the assumption that it has multiple benefits for students with special educational needs (SEN). However, contradictions remain regarding the widespread nature of these benefits, particularly when it comes to academic motivation.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>In this large-scale cross-sectional study, we relied on the Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect (BFLPE) to assess the links between inclusive education and students’ academic self-concepts and learning interests in the mathematics and verbal domains.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>The sample consisted of 21,219 German elementary school children in Grade 4 who were enrolled in three groups: students without SEN attending regular schools (<em>n</em><sub><em>1</em></sub> = 19,069), students with SEN attending regular schools (<em>n</em><sub><em>2</em></sub> = 933), and students with SEN attending special education schools (<em>n</em><sub><em>3</em></sub> = 1214).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Doubly latent multi-group multilevel structural equation models and tests of latent interaction were performed to test the BFLPE.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Results supported the BFLPE for both outcomes and domains. However, no BFLPE was identified for learning interest in the verbal domain among students with SEN attending special education schools, although the size of this effect did not differ significantly from that observed among students without SEN. In regular schools, the BFLPE was almost two times stronger among students with SEN than among their peers without SEN.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Results support the generalizability of the BFLPE to students with SEN, while casting doubts on the motivational benefits of inclusive education for these students. Interventions targeted at attenuating the BFLPE should thus be tailored for both regular and special education schools.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 101966"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000938","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Inclusive education has become increasingly popular based on the assumption that it has multiple benefits for students with special educational needs (SEN). However, contradictions remain regarding the widespread nature of these benefits, particularly when it comes to academic motivation.

Aims

In this large-scale cross-sectional study, we relied on the Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect (BFLPE) to assess the links between inclusive education and students’ academic self-concepts and learning interests in the mathematics and verbal domains.

Sample

The sample consisted of 21,219 German elementary school children in Grade 4 who were enrolled in three groups: students without SEN attending regular schools (n1 = 19,069), students with SEN attending regular schools (n2 = 933), and students with SEN attending special education schools (n3 = 1214).

Methods

Doubly latent multi-group multilevel structural equation models and tests of latent interaction were performed to test the BFLPE.

Results

Results supported the BFLPE for both outcomes and domains. However, no BFLPE was identified for learning interest in the verbal domain among students with SEN attending special education schools, although the size of this effect did not differ significantly from that observed among students without SEN. In regular schools, the BFLPE was almost two times stronger among students with SEN than among their peers without SEN.

Conclusions

Results support the generalizability of the BFLPE to students with SEN, while casting doubts on the motivational benefits of inclusive education for these students. Interventions targeted at attenuating the BFLPE should thus be tailored for both regular and special education schools.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测试普通教育学校与特殊教育学校有特殊教育需求和无特殊教育需求的学生之间的 "大鱼-小鱼-池塘 "效应的调节作用
背景全纳教育对有特殊教育需求(SEN)的学生有多重益处,基于这一假设,全纳教育越来越受欢迎。在这项大规模的横断面研究中,我们采用了 "大鱼-小池效应"(BFLPE)来评估全纳教育与学生在数学和语言领域的学术自我概念和学习兴趣之间的联系。样本样本包括 21,219 名四年级德国小学生,他们被分为三组:在普通学校就读的无特殊教育需要的学生(n1 = 19,069 人)、在普通学校就读的有特殊教育需要的学生(n2 = 933 人)和在特殊教育学校就读的有特殊教育需要的学生(n3 = 1214 人)。方法为了检验 BFLPE,我们建立了双潜伏多组多层次结构方程模型并进行了潜伏交互作用检验。然而,在特殊教育学校就读的有特殊教育需要的学生中,没有发现言语领域学习兴趣的BFLPE,尽管这一效应的大小与在无特殊教育需要的学生中观察到的效应没有显著差异。在普通学校,有特殊教育需要的学生的 BFLPE 比没有特殊教育需要的学生强近两倍。因此,应针对普通教育学校和特殊教育学校的情况,采取旨在减轻 BFLPE 的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.
期刊最新文献
Competitive and non-competitive school climate and students’ well-being Comparison effects on self- and external ratings: Testing the generalizability of the 2I/E model to parents and teachers of academic track school students Testing the CONIC model: The interplay of conscientiousness and interest in predicting academic effort Metacognitive scaffolding for digital reading and mind-wandering in adults with and without ADHD Retrieval supports word learning in children with Down syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1