Physiotherapists' perceptions, readiness, enablers, and barriers to use telerehabilitation: A scoping review.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3233/BMR-240009
Lee Lee Sia, Shobha Sharma, Janet Bong May Ing, Saravana Kumar, Devinder Kaur Ajit Singh
{"title":"Physiotherapists' perceptions, readiness, enablers, and barriers to use telerehabilitation: A scoping review.","authors":"Lee Lee Sia, Shobha Sharma, Janet Bong May Ing, Saravana Kumar, Devinder Kaur Ajit Singh","doi":"10.3233/BMR-240009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The growing use of telerehabilitation within the healthcare community has garnered substantial attention. In congruence with other healthcare fields, examining perceptions, barriers, and facilitators assumed paramount significance in the continuation and fortification of telerehabilitation practices among physiotherapists.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this scoping review, we aimed to systematically map the literature on the perceptions of physiotherapists as well as the barriers and enablers of telerehabilitation in their daily practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The five-stage methodological framework recommended by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) was used for this scoping review. In the framework, eight databases were searched using key search terms such as \"telerehabilitation\", \"physiotherapists\", \"readiness\", \"enablers\" and \"barriers\" All findings were organised into perceptions and readiness, enablers, and barriers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen articles met the inclusion criteria and were categorized as: (1) perception and readiness, (2) enablers, and (3) barriers. In the perception and readiness category, new trends in healthcare, advancement in physiotherapy practices and the benefits to clients were identified. The enablers identified included prior training, personal experience, familiarity with technology, functional equipment and space, and client selection. The barriers to the adoption of telerehabilitation in physiotherapy practice are pinpointed to poor technology, communication hurdles, limited availability, lack of familiarity, and client-related concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While initial evidence suggests a generally positive perceptions it is important to consider both facilitators and barriers when understanding adoption. This review's findings revealed a wide research gap, with unequal weightage towards barriers compared to enablers, and highlights the need for further research. Developing telerehabilitation guidelines that cater to both physiotherapists and clients is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-240009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The growing use of telerehabilitation within the healthcare community has garnered substantial attention. In congruence with other healthcare fields, examining perceptions, barriers, and facilitators assumed paramount significance in the continuation and fortification of telerehabilitation practices among physiotherapists.

Objective: In this scoping review, we aimed to systematically map the literature on the perceptions of physiotherapists as well as the barriers and enablers of telerehabilitation in their daily practice.

Methods: The five-stage methodological framework recommended by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) was used for this scoping review. In the framework, eight databases were searched using key search terms such as "telerehabilitation", "physiotherapists", "readiness", "enablers" and "barriers" All findings were organised into perceptions and readiness, enablers, and barriers.

Results: Fourteen articles met the inclusion criteria and were categorized as: (1) perception and readiness, (2) enablers, and (3) barriers. In the perception and readiness category, new trends in healthcare, advancement in physiotherapy practices and the benefits to clients were identified. The enablers identified included prior training, personal experience, familiarity with technology, functional equipment and space, and client selection. The barriers to the adoption of telerehabilitation in physiotherapy practice are pinpointed to poor technology, communication hurdles, limited availability, lack of familiarity, and client-related concerns.

Conclusion: While initial evidence suggests a generally positive perceptions it is important to consider both facilitators and barriers when understanding adoption. This review's findings revealed a wide research gap, with unequal weightage towards barriers compared to enablers, and highlights the need for further research. Developing telerehabilitation guidelines that cater to both physiotherapists and clients is necessary.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
物理治疗师对使用远程康复的看法、准备情况、促进因素和障碍:范围审查。
背景:远程康复技术在医疗保健领域的应用日益广泛,引起了广泛关注。与其他医疗保健领域一样,研究物理治疗师对远程康复的看法、障碍和促进因素对于继续和加强远程康复实践具有重要意义:在此次范围界定综述中,我们旨在系统地梳理有关物理治疗师在日常实践中对远程康复的认知、障碍和促进因素的文献:本次范围界定研究采用了 Arksey 和 O'Malley(2005 年)推荐的五阶段方法框架。在此框架内,使用 "远程康复"、"物理治疗师"、"准备程度"、"促进因素 "和 "障碍 "等关键检索词对八个数据库进行了检索:结果:14 篇文章符合纳入标准,并分为以下几类结果:14 篇文章符合纳入标准,并被归类为:(1) 感知和准备程度,(2) 推动因素,(3) 障碍。在认知和准备类别中,确定了医疗保健的新趋势、物理治疗实践的进步以及对客户的益处。确定的促进因素包括先前的培训、个人经验、对技术的熟悉程度、功能性设备和空间以及客户选择。在物理治疗实践中采用远程康复技术的障碍主要是技术落后、沟通障碍、可用性有限、不熟悉以及与客户相关的担忧:尽管初步证据表明人们的看法总体上是积极的,但在了解采用情况时必须同时考虑促进因素和障碍。本综述的研究结果表明,与促进因素相比,障碍因素所占的比重不平等,因此存在很大的研究差距,并强调了进一步研究的必要性。有必要制定同时满足物理治疗师和客户需求的远程康复指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
期刊最新文献
Effects of time-dependent acupuncture on back muscle endurance in women with chronic nonspecific low back pain: A randomized crossover trial. Effectiveness of monopolar diathermy by radiofrequency combined with exercise in patients with chronic low back pain: A randomized clinical trial. Percutaneous functional spinal unit cementoplasty versus percutaneous kyphoplasty for severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture complicated with endplate-disc complex injury: A retrospective case-control study. The back body temperatures of patients with idiopathic scoliosis measured through exercise Cognitive functional therapy for lower back pain: A meta-analytical assessment of pain and disability outcomes in randomized controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1