The optimal introversion angle and length of pedicle screw to avoid L1-S1 vascular damage.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY BMC Surgery Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1186/s12893-024-02483-3
Ying Chen, Junyi Yang, Jie Liang, Weifei Wu
{"title":"The optimal introversion angle and length of pedicle screw to avoid L1-S1 vascular damage.","authors":"Ying Chen, Junyi Yang, Jie Liang, Weifei Wu","doi":"10.1186/s12893-024-02483-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>posterior pedicle screw fixation is common method, one of the most severe complications is iatrogenic vascular damage, no report investigated association of different introversion angles (INTAs) and length of pedicle screw. The aims were to investigate the optimal introversion angle and length of pedicle screw for improving the safety of the operation, and to analyze the differences of vascular damage types at L1-S1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Lumbar CT imaging data from110 patients were analyzed by DICOM software, and all parameters were measured by new Cartesian coordinate system, INTAs (L1-L5:5°,10°,15°,S1: 0°, 5°,10°,15°), D<sub>O-AVC</sub> (the distance between the origin (O) with anterior vertebral cortex (AVC)), D<sub>AVC-PGVs</sub> (the distance between AVC and the prevertebral great vessels (PGVs)), D<sub>O-PGVs</sub> (the distance between the O and PGVs). At different INTAs, D<sub>AVC-PGVs</sub> were divided into four grades: Grade III: D<sub>AVC-PGVs</sub> ≤ 3 mm, Grade II: 3 mm < D<sub>AVC-PGVs</sub> ≤ 5 mm, Grade I: D<sub>AVC-PGVs</sub> > 5 mm, and N: the not touching PGVs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimal INTA was 5° at L1-L3, the left was 5° and the right was 15° at L4, and screw length was less than 50 mm at L1-L4. At L5, the left optimal INTA was 5° and the right was 10°, and screw length was less than 45 mm. The optimal INTA was 15° at S1, and screw length was less than 50 mm. However, screw length was less than 40 mm when the INTA was 0° or 5° at S1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At L5-S1, the risk of vascular injury is the highest. INTA and length of the pedicle screw in lumbar operation are closely related. 3 mm interval of screw length may be more preferable to reduce vascular damage.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11191234/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02483-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: posterior pedicle screw fixation is common method, one of the most severe complications is iatrogenic vascular damage, no report investigated association of different introversion angles (INTAs) and length of pedicle screw. The aims were to investigate the optimal introversion angle and length of pedicle screw for improving the safety of the operation, and to analyze the differences of vascular damage types at L1-S1.

Methods: Lumbar CT imaging data from110 patients were analyzed by DICOM software, and all parameters were measured by new Cartesian coordinate system, INTAs (L1-L5:5°,10°,15°,S1: 0°, 5°,10°,15°), DO-AVC (the distance between the origin (O) with anterior vertebral cortex (AVC)), DAVC-PGVs (the distance between AVC and the prevertebral great vessels (PGVs)), DO-PGVs (the distance between the O and PGVs). At different INTAs, DAVC-PGVs were divided into four grades: Grade III: DAVC-PGVs ≤ 3 mm, Grade II: 3 mm < DAVC-PGVs ≤ 5 mm, Grade I: DAVC-PGVs > 5 mm, and N: the not touching PGVs.

Results: The optimal INTA was 5° at L1-L3, the left was 5° and the right was 15° at L4, and screw length was less than 50 mm at L1-L4. At L5, the left optimal INTA was 5° and the right was 10°, and screw length was less than 45 mm. The optimal INTA was 15° at S1, and screw length was less than 50 mm. However, screw length was less than 40 mm when the INTA was 0° or 5° at S1.

Conclusions: At L5-S1, the risk of vascular injury is the highest. INTA and length of the pedicle screw in lumbar operation are closely related. 3 mm interval of screw length may be more preferable to reduce vascular damage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
避免 L1-S1 血管损伤的最佳椎弓根螺钉导入角度和长度。
背景:后路椎弓根螺钉固定术是一种常见的方法,最严重的并发症之一是先天性血管损伤,目前还没有报道研究不同内旋角度(INTA)和椎弓根螺钉长度的关联。本研究的目的是探讨提高手术安全性的最佳内旋角度和椎弓根螺钉长度,并分析 L1-S1 处血管损伤类型的差异:用 DICOM 软件分析 110 例患者的腰椎 CT 成像数据,并用新的直角坐标系、INTAs(L1-L5:5°,10°,15°,S1.0°,5°,10°)测量所有参数:INTA(L1-L5:5°,10°,15°,S1:0°,5°,10°,15°)、DO-AVC(原点(O)与椎体前皮质(AVC)之间的距离)、DAVC-PGVs(AVC 与椎体前大血管(PGVs)之间的距离)、DO-PGVs(O 与 PGVs 之间的距离)。在不同的 INTA,DAVC-PGV 被分为四个等级:III级:DAVC-PGVs ≤ 3 mm;II级:3 mm AVC-PGVs ≤ 5 mm;I级:DAVC-PGVs > 5 mm;N级:未触及PGVs:L1-L3的最佳INTA为5°,L4的左最佳INTA为5°,右最佳INTA为15°,L1-L4的螺钉长度小于50毫米。在 L5,左侧最佳 INTA 为 5°,右侧为 10°,螺钉长度小于 45 毫米。在 S1,最佳 INTA 为 15°,螺钉长度小于 50 毫米。然而,当S1的INTA为0°或5°时,螺钉长度小于40毫米:结论:在L5-S1,血管损伤的风险最高。结论:在腰椎手术中,INTA 和椎弓根螺钉的长度密切相关。3毫米的螺钉长度间隔可能更有利于减少血管损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
期刊最新文献
Real-world study on the application of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in video-assisted thoracoscopic day surgery for pulmonary nodule resection. The seven-day cumulative post-esophagectomy inflammatory response predicts cancer recurrence. Seprafilm® and adhesive small bowel obstruction in colorectal/abdominal surgery: an updated systematic review. The safety and efficacy of stapler method for transection of the pancreatic parenchyma during pancreatoduodenectomy (STRAP-PD trial): study protocol for a randomized control trial. Challenges and opportunities for Mohs surgery implementation in African healthcare systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1