Analyse d’une infrastructure québécoise de transfert de connaissances en autisme : le RNETSA.
IF 0.3 4区 医学Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTHSante PubliquePub Date : 2024-01-01
Marie Massuard, Julie Lane, Luiza Maria Manceau, Pascale Castonguay, Renée Proulx
{"title":"Analyse d’une infrastructure québécoise de transfert de connaissances en autisme : le RNETSA.","authors":"Marie Massuard, Julie Lane, Luiza Maria Manceau, Pascale Castonguay, Renée Proulx","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many Knowledge Translation (KT) networks have been set up to support the improvement of research-based practices. However despite the deployment of KT networks, there is little empirical data on how they work. The Réseau national d’expertise en trouble du spectre de l’autisme (RNETSA) is the result of a ministerial initiative.</p><p><strong>Objective and method: </strong>Its mission is to promote the evolution of autism practices and services in the education, early childhood, and health and social services sectors. The purpose of this article is to analyze the governance structure and KT strategy of the RNETSA in terms of its legitimacy. The study was based on a case study design combining a literature review and interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results highlight the key components of 1) the governance structure (e.g., identification of a common need, formalization of bodies, allocation of resources) and 2) the KT strategy (e.g., knowledge dissemination, collaborations, increasing participation in activities). The discussion addresses a number of building blocks that could help strengthen the network’s legitimacy with a view to bringing it closer to its purpose.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RNETSA has demonstrated a strong capacity to ensure its legitimacy in the autism KT ecosystem. The potential to influence public policy in the field of autism is also a key feature of RNETSA. To improve knowledge of RNETSA’s legitimacy, an evaluation of the effects of its KT activities would be necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":49575,"journal":{"name":"Sante Publique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Many Knowledge Translation (KT) networks have been set up to support the improvement of research-based practices. However despite the deployment of KT networks, there is little empirical data on how they work. The Réseau national d’expertise en trouble du spectre de l’autisme (RNETSA) is the result of a ministerial initiative.
Objective and method: Its mission is to promote the evolution of autism practices and services in the education, early childhood, and health and social services sectors. The purpose of this article is to analyze the governance structure and KT strategy of the RNETSA in terms of its legitimacy. The study was based on a case study design combining a literature review and interviews.
Results: The results highlight the key components of 1) the governance structure (e.g., identification of a common need, formalization of bodies, allocation of resources) and 2) the KT strategy (e.g., knowledge dissemination, collaborations, increasing participation in activities). The discussion addresses a number of building blocks that could help strengthen the network’s legitimacy with a view to bringing it closer to its purpose.
Conclusions: RNETSA has demonstrated a strong capacity to ensure its legitimacy in the autism KT ecosystem. The potential to influence public policy in the field of autism is also a key feature of RNETSA. To improve knowledge of RNETSA’s legitimacy, an evaluation of the effects of its KT activities would be necessary.
期刊介绍:
La revue Santé Publique s’adresse à l’ensemble des acteurs de santé publique qu’ils soient décideurs,
professionnels de santé, acteurs de terrain, chercheurs, enseignants ou formateurs, etc. Elle publie
des travaux de recherche, des évaluations, des analyses d’action, des réflexions sur des interventions
de santé, des opinions, relevant des champs de la santé publique et de l’analyse des services de
soins, des sciences sociales et de l’action sociale.
Santé publique est une revue à comité de lecture, multidisciplinaire et généraliste, qui publie sur
l’ensemble des thèmes de la santé publique parmi lesquels : accès et recours aux soins, déterminants
et inégalités sociales de santé, prévention, éducation pour la santé, promotion de la santé,
organisation des soins, environnement, formation des professionnels de santé, nutrition, politiques
de santé, pratiques professionnelles, qualité des soins, gestion des risques sanitaires, représentation
et santé perçue, santé scolaire, santé et travail, systèmes de santé, systèmes d’information, veille
sanitaire, déterminants de la consommation de soins, organisation et économie des différents
secteurs de production de soins (hôpital, médicament, etc.), évaluation médico-économique
d’activités de soins ou de prévention et de programmes de santé, planification des ressources,
politiques de régulation et de financement, etc