Learning Plan Use in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review.

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000005781
Anna Romanova, Claire Touchie, Sydney Ruller, Shaima Kaka, Alexa Moschella, Marc Zucker, Victoria Cole, Susan Humphrey-Murto
{"title":"Learning Plan Use in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Anna Romanova, Claire Touchie, Sydney Ruller, Shaima Kaka, Alexa Moschella, Marc Zucker, Victoria Cole, Susan Humphrey-Murto","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>How to best support self-regulated learning (SRL) skills development and track trainees' progress along their competency-based medical education learning trajectory is unclear. Learning plans (LPs) may be the answer; however, information on their use in undergraduate medical education (UME) is limited. This study summarizes the literature regarding LP use in UME, explores the student's role in LP development and implementation, and identifies additional research areas.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, Education Source, and Web of Science databases were searched for articles published from database inception to March 6, 2024, and relevant reference lists were manually searched. The review included studies of undergraduate medical students, studies of LP use, and studies of the UME stage in any geographic setting. Data were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative content analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The database search found 7,871 titles and abstracts with an additional 25 found from the manual search for a total of 7,896 articles, of which 39 met inclusion criteria. Many LPs lacked a guiding framework. LPs were associated with self-reported improved SRL skill development, learning structure, and learning outcomes. Barriers to their use for students and faculty were time to create and implement LPs, lack of training on LP development and implementation, and lack of engagement. Facilitators included SRL skill development, LP cocreation, and guidance by a trained mentor. Identified research gaps include objective outcome measures, longitudinal impact beyond UME, standardized framework for LP development and quality assessment, and training on SRL skills and LPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review demonstrates variability of LP use in UME. LPs appear to have potential to support medical student education and facilitate translation of SRL skills into residency training. Successful use requires training and an experienced mentor. However, more research is required to determine whether benefits of LPs outweigh the resources required for their use.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1038-1045"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005781","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: How to best support self-regulated learning (SRL) skills development and track trainees' progress along their competency-based medical education learning trajectory is unclear. Learning plans (LPs) may be the answer; however, information on their use in undergraduate medical education (UME) is limited. This study summarizes the literature regarding LP use in UME, explores the student's role in LP development and implementation, and identifies additional research areas.

Method: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, Education Source, and Web of Science databases were searched for articles published from database inception to March 6, 2024, and relevant reference lists were manually searched. The review included studies of undergraduate medical students, studies of LP use, and studies of the UME stage in any geographic setting. Data were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative content analyses.

Results: The database search found 7,871 titles and abstracts with an additional 25 found from the manual search for a total of 7,896 articles, of which 39 met inclusion criteria. Many LPs lacked a guiding framework. LPs were associated with self-reported improved SRL skill development, learning structure, and learning outcomes. Barriers to their use for students and faculty were time to create and implement LPs, lack of training on LP development and implementation, and lack of engagement. Facilitators included SRL skill development, LP cocreation, and guidance by a trained mentor. Identified research gaps include objective outcome measures, longitudinal impact beyond UME, standardized framework for LP development and quality assessment, and training on SRL skills and LPs.

Conclusions: This review demonstrates variability of LP use in UME. LPs appear to have potential to support medical student education and facilitate translation of SRL skills into residency training. Successful use requires training and an experienced mentor. However, more research is required to determine whether benefits of LPs outweigh the resources required for their use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本科医学教育中学习计划的使用:范围审查。
目的:如何最好地支持自我调节学习(SRL)技能的发展,并跟踪学员在基于能力的医学教育学习轨迹上的进展,目前尚不清楚。学习计划(LPs)可能就是答案;然而,有关在本科医学教育(UME)中使用学习计划的信息却很有限。本研究总结了有关在本科医学教育中使用学习计划的文献,探讨了学生在制定和实施学习计划中的作用,并确定了其他研究领域:方法:检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、PsycInfo、Education Source 和 Web of Science 数据库中从数据库建立到 2024 年 3 月 6 日发表的文章,并人工检索了相关参考文献列表。综述包括针对本科医学生的研究、关于使用 LP 的研究以及在任何地理环境下对 UME 阶段的研究。采用定量和定性内容分析法对数据进行了分析:数据库检索发现了 7871 篇标题和摘要,人工检索又发现了 25 篇,共计 7896 篇文章,其中 39 篇符合纳入标准。许多学习方法缺乏指导框架。自学方法与自我报告的自学能力发展、学习结构和学习成果的改善有关。学生和教师使用自学规划的障碍是创建和实施自学规划的时间、缺乏关于自学规划开发和实施的培训以及缺乏参与。促进因素包括自学能力发展技能、共同创建学习规划以及训练有素的导师的指导。已确定的研究空白包括客观的结果测量、UME以外的纵向影响、LP开发和质量评估的标准化框架以及自学能力技能和LP的培训:本综述显示了在 UME 中使用自学能力的可变性。LP似乎有潜力支持医学生教育,并促进SRL技能在住院医师培训中的转化。成功使用 LP 需要培训和经验丰富的导师。然而,还需要进行更多的研究,以确定自学考试的益处是否超过使用自学考试所需的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
期刊最新文献
Validating the 2023 Association of American Medical Colleges Graduate Medical Education Leadership Competencies. World Federation for Medical Education Recognizes 5 International Accrediting Bodies. Irony. Teaching Opportunities for Postgraduate Trainees in Primary Care. How Many Is Too Many? Using Cognitive Load Theory to Determine the Maximum Safe Number of Inpatient Consultations for Trainees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1