Parsimonious cumulative process-based workflow for early sanitation infrastructure evaluation (CPESI): Case study of Riohacha, Colombia

IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Cleaner Environmental Systems Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100203
Yamileth C. Herrera , Ronald R. Gutierrez , Carlos Pacheco-Bustos
{"title":"Parsimonious cumulative process-based workflow for early sanitation infrastructure evaluation (CPESI): Case study of Riohacha, Colombia","authors":"Yamileth C. Herrera ,&nbsp;Ronald R. Gutierrez ,&nbsp;Carlos Pacheco-Bustos","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In small and medium-sized cities from developing countries, the early selection of integrated wastewater management systems is challenging due to the lack or limitations in the availability of basic information and skilled professionals. This study presents CPESI, a cumulative processes-based parsimonious workflow for early evaluation of sanitary infrastructure. CPESI is aimed to provide a simple, objective, and systematic analysis framework at the early stages of development of sanitary systems in underdeveloped nations. CPESI was applied to evaluate sanitation system alternatives for Riohacha (Colombia) in three stages, namely, (1) an initial assessment of citizens acceptability of the alternatives and analysis of basic laboratory testing; (2) a process analysis and technical-economic evaluation of alternatives based on CAPEX and OPEX indicators; and (3) engineering judgment to select the most viable alternative through multi-criteria evaluation. Our results suggest that CPESI could be highly replicable in developing countries and that it has the potential to expedite the alternatives assessment process when compared to data-intensive methods and expert requirements. Several researchers have highlighted the need to develop tools suitable to evaluate SDG 6 in developing nations. We believe that CPESI has the potential to contribute to that end.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100203"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000412/pdfft?md5=77c3772e2971387e0360a21470c859e0&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000412-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In small and medium-sized cities from developing countries, the early selection of integrated wastewater management systems is challenging due to the lack or limitations in the availability of basic information and skilled professionals. This study presents CPESI, a cumulative processes-based parsimonious workflow for early evaluation of sanitary infrastructure. CPESI is aimed to provide a simple, objective, and systematic analysis framework at the early stages of development of sanitary systems in underdeveloped nations. CPESI was applied to evaluate sanitation system alternatives for Riohacha (Colombia) in three stages, namely, (1) an initial assessment of citizens acceptability of the alternatives and analysis of basic laboratory testing; (2) a process analysis and technical-economic evaluation of alternatives based on CAPEX and OPEX indicators; and (3) engineering judgment to select the most viable alternative through multi-criteria evaluation. Our results suggest that CPESI could be highly replicable in developing countries and that it has the potential to expedite the alternatives assessment process when compared to data-intensive methods and expert requirements. Several researchers have highlighted the need to develop tools suitable to evaluate SDG 6 in developing nations. We believe that CPESI has the potential to contribute to that end.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于早期环境卫生基础设施评估(CPESI)的基于过程的准累积工作流程:哥伦比亚里奥哈查案例研究
在发展中国家的中小城市,由于缺乏基本信息和专业技术人员,早期选择综合污水处理系统具有挑战性。本研究介绍了 CPESI,这是一种基于累积过程的准工作流程,用于卫生基础设施的早期评估。CPESI 旨在为欠发达国家卫生系统发展的早期阶段提供一个简单、客观和系统的分析框架。CPESI 被应用于评估里奥哈查(哥伦比亚)的卫生系统替代方案,分为三个阶段,即:(1)对替代方案的公民可接受性进行初步评估,并对基本实验室测试进行分析;(2)根据资本支出和运营支出指标对替代方案进行流程分析和技术经济评估;以及(3)通过多标准评估进行工程判断,以选择最可行的替代方案。我们的研究结果表明,CPESI 在发展中国家具有很强的可复制性,与数据密集型方法和专家要求相比,CPESI 有可能加快替代品评估过程。一些研究人员强调,需要开发适合发展中国家评估可持续发展目标 6 的工具。我们认为 CPESI 有可能为此做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Cleaner Environmental Systems Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Life cycle assessment of a point absorber wave energy converter A systematic review of the SAFA framework in the literature: An approach to assess sustainability in agri-food systems Implications of environmental constraints and opportunities on livestock production and emissions: New Zealand as a case study Linking environmental impact assessment and Positive Energy Districts: A literature review Gate-to-gate life cycle assessment of lithium-ion battery recycling pre-treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1