Fuzzy-defined entities: A key concept to strengthen forensic science foundations?

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL Forensic science international Pub Date : 2024-06-16 DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112110
Lionel Brocard , David-Olivier Jaquet-Chiffelle
{"title":"Fuzzy-defined entities: A key concept to strengthen forensic science foundations?","authors":"Lionel Brocard ,&nbsp;David-Olivier Jaquet-Chiffelle","doi":"10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>According to the Sydney Declaration, “Forensic science is [… an] endeavour to study traces […] through their detection, recognition, recovery, examination and interpretation to understand anomalous events of public interest (e.g., crimes, security incidents).” This science is focused on establishing the nature and relationships among entities related to events having a potential legal impact. Entities can be (groups of) persons, objects, activities and their corresponding sources, events and traces. Although uniqueness of an entity has been traditionally accepted as a principle of forensic science, this paper argues and illustrates that such uniqueness is illusory: Not only can an entity evolve spatially and temporally, but at any specific instant, it <em>differs from itself</em> according to the level of precision at which it is considered. Its characteristics vary based on when, how and by whom it is perceived. We introduce the concept of fuzzy entities - defined to formally include some essential uncertainty or imprecision. The essential impreciseness and subjectivity of an entity gives a new perspective that allows us to revisit Kirk's principle of individuality and to propose to replace it with a new principle of <em>fuzzy unicity</em>. We believe that this new perspective has the potential to strengthen forensic science foundations and bring closer its disciplines, which is an important step towards a harmonized forensic science.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12341,"journal":{"name":"Forensic science international","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073824001919/pdfft?md5=23a9a81df80d864a6bff50e22462565e&pid=1-s2.0-S0379073824001919-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic science international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073824001919","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to the Sydney Declaration, “Forensic science is [… an] endeavour to study traces […] through their detection, recognition, recovery, examination and interpretation to understand anomalous events of public interest (e.g., crimes, security incidents).” This science is focused on establishing the nature and relationships among entities related to events having a potential legal impact. Entities can be (groups of) persons, objects, activities and their corresponding sources, events and traces. Although uniqueness of an entity has been traditionally accepted as a principle of forensic science, this paper argues and illustrates that such uniqueness is illusory: Not only can an entity evolve spatially and temporally, but at any specific instant, it differs from itself according to the level of precision at which it is considered. Its characteristics vary based on when, how and by whom it is perceived. We introduce the concept of fuzzy entities - defined to formally include some essential uncertainty or imprecision. The essential impreciseness and subjectivity of an entity gives a new perspective that allows us to revisit Kirk's principle of individuality and to propose to replace it with a new principle of fuzzy unicity. We believe that this new perspective has the potential to strengthen forensic science foundations and bring closer its disciplines, which is an important step towards a harmonized forensic science.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模糊定义的实体:加强法医学基础的关键概念?
根据《悉尼宣言》,"法医学是[......]研究[......]蛛丝马迹的一种努力,通过对蛛丝马迹的探测、识别、恢复、检查和解释,以了解涉及公众利益的异常事件(如犯罪、安全事件)"。这门科学的重点是确定与具有潜在法律影响的事件有关的实体的性质和关系。实体可以是(一组)人、物、活动及其相应的来源、事件和痕迹。虽然实体的唯一性历来被认为是法医学的一项原则,但本文认为并说明这种唯一性是虚幻的:一个实体不仅可以在空间和时间上演变,而且在任何特定的瞬间,都会因考虑的精确程度不同而与自身不同。它的特征会根据何时、如何以及由谁感知而变化。我们引入了模糊实体的概念--其定义在形式上包括一些基本的不确定性或不精确性。实体的本质不确定性和主观性为我们提供了一个新的视角,使我们能够重新审视柯克的个体性原则,并建议用新的模糊统一性原则取而代之。我们相信,这一新的视角有可能加强法医学的基础,拉近各学科之间的距离,这是向统一法医学迈出的重要一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic science international
Forensic science international 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Forensic Science International is the flagship journal in the prestigious Forensic Science International family, publishing the most innovative, cutting-edge, and influential contributions across the forensic sciences. Fields include: forensic pathology and histochemistry, chemistry, biochemistry and toxicology, biology, serology, odontology, psychiatry, anthropology, digital forensics, the physical sciences, firearms, and document examination, as well as investigations of value to public health in its broadest sense, and the important marginal area where science and medicine interact with the law. The journal publishes: Case Reports Commentaries Letters to the Editor Original Research Papers (Regular Papers) Rapid Communications Review Articles Technical Notes.
期刊最新文献
Sensitivity assessment of the modified ABAcard® HemaTrace® and p30 immunochromatographic test cards Degradation and preservation of nitrites in whole blood Post mortem chiral analysis of MDMA and MDA in human blood and hair The 2 stages of cartridge primer toolmark production and the implied impact of cartridge manufacturing tolerances Letter to Editor regarding article “Ok Google, Start a Fire. IoT devices as witnesses and actors in fire investigations”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1