Oxalate Nephropathy After Kidney Transplantation: Risk Factors and Outcomes of Two Phenotypes

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Clinical Transplantation Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1111/ctr.15368
Neetika Garg, Thanh Thanh Nguyen, Brad C. Astor, Weixiong Zhong, Sandesh Parajuli, Fahad Aziz, Maha Mohamed, Arjang Djamali, Suzanne M. Norby, Didier A. Mandelbrot
{"title":"Oxalate Nephropathy After Kidney Transplantation: Risk Factors and Outcomes of Two Phenotypes","authors":"Neetika Garg,&nbsp;Thanh Thanh Nguyen,&nbsp;Brad C. Astor,&nbsp;Weixiong Zhong,&nbsp;Sandesh Parajuli,&nbsp;Fahad Aziz,&nbsp;Maha Mohamed,&nbsp;Arjang Djamali,&nbsp;Suzanne M. Norby,&nbsp;Didier A. Mandelbrot","doi":"10.1111/ctr.15368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Describing risk factors and outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with oxalate nephropathy (ON) may help elucidate the pathogenesis and guide treatment strategies. We used a large single-center database to identify patients with ON and categorized them into delayed graft function with ON (DGF-ON) and late ON. Incidence density sampling was used to select controls. A total of 37 ON cases were diagnosed between 1/2011 and 1/2021. DGF-ON (<i>n</i> = 13) was diagnosed in 1.05% of the DGF population. Pancreatic atrophy on imaging (36.4% vs. 2.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and gastric bypass history (7.7% vs. 0%; <i>p</i> = 0.06) were more common in DGF-ON than with controls with DGF requiring biopsy but without evidence of ON. DGF-ON was not associated with worse graft survival (<i>p</i> = 0.98) or death-censored graft survival (<i>p</i> = 0.48). Late ON (<i>n</i> = 24) was diagnosed after a mean of 78.2 months. Late ON patients were older (mean age 55.1 vs. 48.4 years; <i>p</i> = 0.02), more likely to be women (61.7% vs. 37.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.03), have gastric bypass history (8.3% vs. 0.8%; <i>p</i> = 0.02) and pancreatic atrophy on imaging (38.9% vs. 13.3%; <i>p</i> = 0.02). Late ON was associated with an increased risk of graft failure (HR 2.0; <i>p</i> = 0.07) and death-censored graft loss (HR 2.5; <i>p</i> = 0.10). We describe two phenotypes of ON after kidney transplantation: DGF-ON and late ON. Our study is the first to our knowledge to evaluate DGF-ON with DGF controls without ON. Although limited by small sample size, DGF-ON was not associated with adverse outcomes when compared with controls. Late ON predicted worse allograft outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ctr.15368","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.15368","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Describing risk factors and outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with oxalate nephropathy (ON) may help elucidate the pathogenesis and guide treatment strategies. We used a large single-center database to identify patients with ON and categorized them into delayed graft function with ON (DGF-ON) and late ON. Incidence density sampling was used to select controls. A total of 37 ON cases were diagnosed between 1/2011 and 1/2021. DGF-ON (n = 13) was diagnosed in 1.05% of the DGF population. Pancreatic atrophy on imaging (36.4% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.002) and gastric bypass history (7.7% vs. 0%; p = 0.06) were more common in DGF-ON than with controls with DGF requiring biopsy but without evidence of ON. DGF-ON was not associated with worse graft survival (p = 0.98) or death-censored graft survival (p = 0.48). Late ON (n = 24) was diagnosed after a mean of 78.2 months. Late ON patients were older (mean age 55.1 vs. 48.4 years; p = 0.02), more likely to be women (61.7% vs. 37.5%; p = 0.03), have gastric bypass history (8.3% vs. 0.8%; p = 0.02) and pancreatic atrophy on imaging (38.9% vs. 13.3%; p = 0.02). Late ON was associated with an increased risk of graft failure (HR 2.0; p = 0.07) and death-censored graft loss (HR 2.5; p = 0.10). We describe two phenotypes of ON after kidney transplantation: DGF-ON and late ON. Our study is the first to our knowledge to evaluate DGF-ON with DGF controls without ON. Although limited by small sample size, DGF-ON was not associated with adverse outcomes when compared with controls. Late ON predicted worse allograft outcomes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肾移植后的草酸盐肾病:两种表型的风险因素和结果
描述患有草酸盐肾病(ON)的肾移植受者的风险因素和预后有助于阐明发病机制并指导治疗策略。我们利用一个大型单中心数据库确定了ON患者,并将其分为伴有ON的移植物功能延迟(DGF-ON)和晚期ON。对照组采用发病密度抽样。2011年1月1日至2021年1月1日期间共诊断出37例ON患者。DGF人群中有1.05%确诊为DGF-ON(n = 13)。与需要活检但无胰腺肿瘤证据的DGF对照组相比,DGF-ON病例中影像学显示的胰腺萎缩(36.4%对2.9%,p = 0.002)和胃旁路病史(7.7%对0%,p = 0.06)更为常见。DGF-ON与较差的移植物存活率(p = 0.98)或死亡剪除移植物存活率(p = 0.48)无关。晚期ON(n = 24)平均在78.2个月后确诊。晚期胰腺癌患者年龄较大(平均年龄 55.1 岁 vs. 48.4 岁;p = 0.02),更可能是女性(61.7% vs. 37.5%;p = 0.03),有胃旁路手术史(8.3% vs. 0.8%;p = 0.02),影像学检查发现胰腺萎缩(38.9% vs. 13.3%;p = 0.02)。晚期ON与移植物失败风险增加(HR 2.0;p = 0.07)和死亡校正移植物丢失风险增加(HR 2.5;p = 0.10)相关。我们描述了肾移植后ON的两种表型:DGF-ON和晚期ON。据我们所知,我们的研究是第一项评估DGF-ON与无ON的DGF对照的研究。虽然受样本量小的限制,但与对照组相比,DGF-ON 与不良预后无关。晚期ON预示着更差的异体移植结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Transplantation
Clinical Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
286
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored. Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include: Immunology and immunosuppression; Patient preparation; Social, ethical, and psychological issues; Complications, short- and long-term results; Artificial organs; Donation and preservation of organ and tissue; Translational studies; Advances in tissue typing; Updates on transplant pathology;. Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries. Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.
期刊最新文献
ChatGPT Solving Complex Kidney Transplant Cases: A Comparative Study With Human Respondents Interplay of Donor–Recipient Relationship and Donor Race in Living Liver Donation in the United States Successful Kidney Transplantation Despite Therapeutic Anticoagulation—Effective Apixaban Elimination by Hemoadsorption Subclinical Pancreas Rejection on Protocol Biopsy Within the First Year of Simultaneous Pancreas Kidney Transplant External Validation of a Limited Sampling Strategy for the Estimation of Mycophenolic Acid Exposure Between Different Assay Methods: PETINIA and HPLC Methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1