Potential exposure of honey bees to neonicotinoid seed treatments in US rice.

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY Environmental Entomology Pub Date : 2024-08-17 DOI:10.1093/ee/nvae057
Nicholas Ryan Bateman, Benjamin C Thrash, Whitney D Crow, Tyler B Towles, Don R Cook, Gus M Lorenz, Jeffrey Gore
{"title":"Potential exposure of honey bees to neonicotinoid seed treatments in US rice.","authors":"Nicholas Ryan Bateman, Benjamin C Thrash, Whitney D Crow, Tyler B Towles, Don R Cook, Gus M Lorenz, Jeffrey Gore","doi":"10.1093/ee/nvae057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neonicotinoid insecticide seed treatments are commonly used in rice (Oryza sativa) production to control rice water weevil (Lisorhoptrus oryzophilus). With the use of neonicotinoid seed treatments, there is potential that honey bees (Apis mellifera) could be exposed to neonicotinoids through translocation to the pollen. Studies were conducted in 2015 and 2016 to determine the level of neonicotinoids present in flag leaves, pollen, and grain of rice. Thiamethoxam was applied as a seed treatment and foliar prior to flooding. Clothianidin was applied as a seed treatment and as a foliar at a preflood and postflood timing. Subsamples of flag leaves, pollen, and grain were analyzed for positive neonicotinoid detections and abundance. Thiamethoxam was detected in 8.9% of samples and clothianidin was detected in 1.4% of samples. For both thiamethoxam and clothianidin, more positive samples were observed in flag leaf samples than in pollen or grain. An average of 4.30 ng/g of thiamethoxam was detected in flag leaves from seed-applied thiamethoxam. An average of 1.25 ng/g of clothianidin was found in flag leaves from a preflood application of clothianidin. A survey of honey bees present in rice fields was conducted in Mississippi and Arkansas to determine the abundance of honey bees present in rice fields based on the time of day. Honey bee densities were low in rice, with less than 5% and 3% positive detections observed in Mississippi and Arkansas, respectively. More positive detections and higher densities of honey bees were observed for mid-day sampling than for morning or evening sampling.</p>","PeriodicalId":11751,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Entomology","volume":" ","pages":"716-722"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvae057","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neonicotinoid insecticide seed treatments are commonly used in rice (Oryza sativa) production to control rice water weevil (Lisorhoptrus oryzophilus). With the use of neonicotinoid seed treatments, there is potential that honey bees (Apis mellifera) could be exposed to neonicotinoids through translocation to the pollen. Studies were conducted in 2015 and 2016 to determine the level of neonicotinoids present in flag leaves, pollen, and grain of rice. Thiamethoxam was applied as a seed treatment and foliar prior to flooding. Clothianidin was applied as a seed treatment and as a foliar at a preflood and postflood timing. Subsamples of flag leaves, pollen, and grain were analyzed for positive neonicotinoid detections and abundance. Thiamethoxam was detected in 8.9% of samples and clothianidin was detected in 1.4% of samples. For both thiamethoxam and clothianidin, more positive samples were observed in flag leaf samples than in pollen or grain. An average of 4.30 ng/g of thiamethoxam was detected in flag leaves from seed-applied thiamethoxam. An average of 1.25 ng/g of clothianidin was found in flag leaves from a preflood application of clothianidin. A survey of honey bees present in rice fields was conducted in Mississippi and Arkansas to determine the abundance of honey bees present in rice fields based on the time of day. Honey bee densities were low in rice, with less than 5% and 3% positive detections observed in Mississippi and Arkansas, respectively. More positive detections and higher densities of honey bees were observed for mid-day sampling than for morning or evening sampling.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蜜蜂可能接触到美国水稻中的新烟碱类种子处理剂。
新烟碱类杀虫剂种子处理剂通常用于水稻(Oryza sativa)生产,以控制稻水象鼻虫(Lisorhoptrus oryzophilus)。随着新烟碱类杀虫剂种子处理剂的使用,蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)有可能通过花粉的转移而接触到新烟碱类杀虫剂。2015 年和 2016 年进行了研究,以确定水稻旗叶、花粉和谷粒中的新烟碱含量。噻虫嗪作为种子处理剂在水淹前叶面喷施。噻虫嗪作为种子处理剂和叶面喷施剂分别在淹水前和淹水后施用。对旗叶、花粉和谷物的子样进行了分析,以确定新烟碱的阳性检测结果和丰度。在 8.9% 的样本中检测到了噻虫嗪,在 1.4% 的样本中检测到了噻虫嗪。对于噻虫嗪和噻虫嗪,旗叶样本中的阳性样本多于花粉或谷物样本。在施用了噻虫嗪的种子的旗叶中平均检测到 4.30 纳克/克的噻虫嗪。在淹水前施用噻虫嗪的禾木叶中平均检测到 1.25 纳克/克的噻虫嗪。在密西西比州和阿肯色州对稻田中的蜜蜂进行了调查,以确定根据一天中的不同时间稻田中蜜蜂的数量。水稻中的蜜蜂密度较低,密西西比州和阿肯色州的阳性检测率分别不足 5%和 3%。与早晨或傍晚采样相比,中午采样的蜜蜂阳性检出率更高,密度也更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Entomology
Environmental Entomology 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
97
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental Entomology is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December. The journal publishes reports on the interaction of insects with the biological, chemical, and physical aspects of their environment. In addition to research papers, Environmental Entomology publishes Reviews, interpretive articles in a Forum section, and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
A review of non-microbial biological control strategies against the Asian longhorned beetle (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Addition of ammonium acetate to torula yeast borax and its effect on captures of three species of economically important fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Testing the efficacy of Trichogramma ostriniae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) as a inundative biological control agent in Western Nebraska. Sex-ratio distortion in a weed biological control agent, Ceratapion basicorne (Coleoptera: Brentidae), associated with a species of Rickettsia. Catching invasives with curiosity: the importance of passive biosecurity surveillance systems for invasive forest pest detection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1