Biomechanical evaluation of double-stranded knot configurations in high-strength sutures and tapes.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Pub Date : 2024-06-22 DOI:10.1007/s00068-024-02566-z
Mehar Dhillon, Tatjana Pastor, Ivan Zderic, Sarina Hebsacker, Björn-Christian Link, James Fletcher, R Geoff Richards, Boyko Gueorguiev, Torsten Pastor
{"title":"Biomechanical evaluation of double-stranded knot configurations in high-strength sutures and tapes.","authors":"Mehar Dhillon, Tatjana Pastor, Ivan Zderic, Sarina Hebsacker, Björn-Christian Link, James Fletcher, R Geoff Richards, Boyko Gueorguiev, Torsten Pastor","doi":"10.1007/s00068-024-02566-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recently, a new dynamic high-strength suture (DC) was introduced, also available in tape form (DT), featuring a salt-infused silicone core attracting water in a fluid environment to preserve tissue approximation. The aims of this study were to (1) assess the influence of securing throw number on knot security of two double-stranded knot configurations (Cow-hitch and Nice-knot) tied with either dynamic (DC and DT) or conventional (FW and ST) high-strength sutures and tapes, and (2) compare the ultimate force and knot slippage of the novel dynamic versus conventional sutures and tapes when used with their minimal number of needed securing throws.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven specimens of each FW, ST, DC and DT were considered for tying with Cow-hitch or Nice-knots. The base of these Cow-hitch and Nice-knots was secured with surgeons` knots using 1-3 alternating throws. Tensile tests were conducted under physiologic conditions to evaluate knot slippage, ultimate force at rupture, and minimum number of throws ensuring 100% knot security.  RESULTS:  For both Cow-hitch and Nice-knots, 100% security was achieved with 2 securing throws for DC, DT, ST, and with 3 securing throws for FW. With these minimum numbers of securing throws, ultimate force was significantly higher for Nice-knots versus Cow-hitch tied with DT (p = 0.001) and slippage was significantly less with Nice-knots versus Cow-hitch tied with DC (p = 0.019).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The minimum number of securing throws required to achieve 100% security was 2 with DC, DT and ST for both Cow-hitch and Nice-knots configurations, in contrast to FW where 3 securing throws were needed. With these minimum numbers of securing throws, Nice-knots were associated with significantly higher ultimate forces when using DT and lower slippage with DC versus Cow-hitch knots.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02566-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Recently, a new dynamic high-strength suture (DC) was introduced, also available in tape form (DT), featuring a salt-infused silicone core attracting water in a fluid environment to preserve tissue approximation. The aims of this study were to (1) assess the influence of securing throw number on knot security of two double-stranded knot configurations (Cow-hitch and Nice-knot) tied with either dynamic (DC and DT) or conventional (FW and ST) high-strength sutures and tapes, and (2) compare the ultimate force and knot slippage of the novel dynamic versus conventional sutures and tapes when used with their minimal number of needed securing throws.

Methods: Seven specimens of each FW, ST, DC and DT were considered for tying with Cow-hitch or Nice-knots. The base of these Cow-hitch and Nice-knots was secured with surgeons` knots using 1-3 alternating throws. Tensile tests were conducted under physiologic conditions to evaluate knot slippage, ultimate force at rupture, and minimum number of throws ensuring 100% knot security.  RESULTS:  For both Cow-hitch and Nice-knots, 100% security was achieved with 2 securing throws for DC, DT, ST, and with 3 securing throws for FW. With these minimum numbers of securing throws, ultimate force was significantly higher for Nice-knots versus Cow-hitch tied with DT (p = 0.001) and slippage was significantly less with Nice-knots versus Cow-hitch tied with DC (p = 0.019).

Conclusions: The minimum number of securing throws required to achieve 100% security was 2 with DC, DT and ST for both Cow-hitch and Nice-knots configurations, in contrast to FW where 3 securing throws were needed. With these minimum numbers of securing throws, Nice-knots were associated with significantly higher ultimate forces when using DT and lower slippage with DC versus Cow-hitch knots.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高强度缝合线和胶带中双股绳结配置的生物力学评估。
目的:最近推出了一种新型动态高强度缝合线 (DC),也有胶带形式 (DT),其特点是注入盐的硅胶芯在流体环境中吸水,以保持组织近似性。本研究的目的是:(1) 评估用动态(DC 和 DT)或传统(FW 和 ST)高强度缝合线和胶带打结的两种双股绳结配置(Cow-hitch 和 Nice-knot)的固定抛掷次数对绳结安全性的影响;(2) 比较新型动态缝合线和胶带与传统缝合线和胶带在使用所需的最小固定抛掷次数时的极限力和绳结滑动情况:方法:将 FW、ST、DC 和 DT 各 7 个试样考虑使用牛钩结或尼斯结进行打结。这些牛钩结和尼斯结的底部用外科医生结固定,交替使用 1-3 次。在生理条件下进行了拉伸试验,以评估绳结的滑动、断裂时的极限力以及确保绳结 100% 安全的最小抛掷次数。 结果:对于牛钩结和尼斯结而言,DC、DT 和 ST 用 2 次打结,FW 用 3 次打结,就能达到 100% 的安全性。在这些最低固定次数下,Nice-绳结的极限力明显高于用 DT 打结的 Cow-hitch(p = 0.001),Nice-绳结的滑动明显低于用 DC 打结的 Cow-hitch(p = 0.019):在 DC、DT 和 ST 中,牛绳和尼斯结都需要 2 次固定才能达到 100% 的安全性,而在 FW 中则需要 3 次固定。在使用这些最低固定次数的情况下,使用 DT 时,尼斯结的极限力明显更高,而使用 DC 时,滑移率则低于牛绳结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
期刊最新文献
Non-operative treatment of metacarpal fractures and patient-reported outcomes: a multicentre snapshot study. Focus on challenges and advances in the treatment of traumatic brain injury. Publisher Correction: How does damage control strategy influence organ's suitability for donation after major trauma? A multi-institutional study. TBI related death has become the new epidemic in polytrauma: a 10-year prospective cohort analysis in severely injured patients Angioembolization in patients with blunt splenic trauma in Germany –guidelines vs. Reality a retrospective registry-based cohort study of the TraumaRegister DGU®
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1