{"title":"Predicting State-Level Firearm Suicide Rates: A Machine Learning Approach Using Public Policy Data.","authors":"Evan V Goldstein, Fernando A Wilson","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.06.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Over 40,000 people die by suicide annually in the U.S., and firearms are the most lethal suicide method. There is limited evidence on the effectiveness of many state-level policies on reducing firearm suicide. The objective of this study was to identify public policies that best predict state-level firearm suicide rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's WONDER system and the State Firearm Law Database, a longitudinal catalog of 134 firearm safety laws, were analyzed. The analysis included 1,450 observations from 50 states spanning 1991-2019. An ElasticNet regression technique was used to analyze the relationship between the policy variables and firearm suicide rates. Nested cross-validation was performed to tune the model hyperparameters. The study data were collected and analyzed in 2023 and 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimized ElasticNet approach had a mean squared error of 2.07, which was superior to nonregularized and dummy regressor models. The most influential policies for predicting the firearm suicide rate on average included laws requiring firearm dealers that sell handguns to have a state license and laws requiring individuals to obtain a permit to purchase a firearm through an approval process that includes law enforcement, among others.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>On average, firearm suicide rates were lower in state-years that had each influential policy active. Notably, these analyses were ecological and noncausal. However, this study was able to use a supervised machine learning approach with inherent feature selection and many policy types to make predictions using unseen data (i.e., balancing Lasso and Ridge regularization penalties).</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2024.06.015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Over 40,000 people die by suicide annually in the U.S., and firearms are the most lethal suicide method. There is limited evidence on the effectiveness of many state-level policies on reducing firearm suicide. The objective of this study was to identify public policies that best predict state-level firearm suicide rates.
Methods: Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's WONDER system and the State Firearm Law Database, a longitudinal catalog of 134 firearm safety laws, were analyzed. The analysis included 1,450 observations from 50 states spanning 1991-2019. An ElasticNet regression technique was used to analyze the relationship between the policy variables and firearm suicide rates. Nested cross-validation was performed to tune the model hyperparameters. The study data were collected and analyzed in 2023 and 2024.
Results: The optimized ElasticNet approach had a mean squared error of 2.07, which was superior to nonregularized and dummy regressor models. The most influential policies for predicting the firearm suicide rate on average included laws requiring firearm dealers that sell handguns to have a state license and laws requiring individuals to obtain a permit to purchase a firearm through an approval process that includes law enforcement, among others.
Conclusions: On average, firearm suicide rates were lower in state-years that had each influential policy active. Notably, these analyses were ecological and noncausal. However, this study was able to use a supervised machine learning approach with inherent feature selection and many policy types to make predictions using unseen data (i.e., balancing Lasso and Ridge regularization penalties).
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health.
Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.