Predicting State-Level Firearm Suicide Rates: A Machine Learning Approach Using Public Policy Data.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL American Journal of Preventive Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2024.06.015
Evan V Goldstein, Fernando A Wilson
{"title":"Predicting State-Level Firearm Suicide Rates: A Machine Learning Approach Using Public Policy Data.","authors":"Evan V Goldstein, Fernando A Wilson","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.06.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Over 40,000 people die by suicide annually in the U.S., and firearms are the most lethal suicide method. There is limited evidence on the effectiveness of many state-level policies on reducing firearm suicide. The objective of this study was to identify public policies that best predict state-level firearm suicide rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's WONDER system and the State Firearm Law Database, a longitudinal catalog of 134 firearm safety laws, were analyzed. The analysis included 1,450 observations from 50 states spanning 1991-2019. An ElasticNet regression technique was used to analyze the relationship between the policy variables and firearm suicide rates. Nested cross-validation was performed to tune the model hyperparameters. The study data were collected and analyzed in 2023 and 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimized ElasticNet approach had a mean squared error of 2.07, which was superior to nonregularized and dummy regressor models. The most influential policies for predicting the firearm suicide rate on average included laws requiring firearm dealers that sell handguns to have a state license and laws requiring individuals to obtain a permit to purchase a firearm through an approval process that includes law enforcement, among others.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>On average, firearm suicide rates were lower in state-years that had each influential policy active. Notably, these analyses were ecological and noncausal. However, this study was able to use a supervised machine learning approach with inherent feature selection and many policy types to make predictions using unseen data (i.e., balancing Lasso and Ridge regularization penalties).</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2024.06.015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Over 40,000 people die by suicide annually in the U.S., and firearms are the most lethal suicide method. There is limited evidence on the effectiveness of many state-level policies on reducing firearm suicide. The objective of this study was to identify public policies that best predict state-level firearm suicide rates.

Methods: Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's WONDER system and the State Firearm Law Database, a longitudinal catalog of 134 firearm safety laws, were analyzed. The analysis included 1,450 observations from 50 states spanning 1991-2019. An ElasticNet regression technique was used to analyze the relationship between the policy variables and firearm suicide rates. Nested cross-validation was performed to tune the model hyperparameters. The study data were collected and analyzed in 2023 and 2024.

Results: The optimized ElasticNet approach had a mean squared error of 2.07, which was superior to nonregularized and dummy regressor models. The most influential policies for predicting the firearm suicide rate on average included laws requiring firearm dealers that sell handguns to have a state license and laws requiring individuals to obtain a permit to purchase a firearm through an approval process that includes law enforcement, among others.

Conclusions: On average, firearm suicide rates were lower in state-years that had each influential policy active. Notably, these analyses were ecological and noncausal. However, this study was able to use a supervised machine learning approach with inherent feature selection and many policy types to make predictions using unseen data (i.e., balancing Lasso and Ridge regularization penalties).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测州一级持枪自杀率:使用公共政策数据的机器学习方法》。
导言:美国每年有超过 40,000 人死于自杀,而枪支是最致命的自杀方式。许多州级政策在减少持枪自杀方面的有效性证据有限。本研究旨在找出最能预测州级持枪自杀率的公共政策:分析了来自美国疾病控制与预防中心 WONDER 系统和州枪支法数据库的数据,该数据库是 134 项枪支安全法律的纵向目录。分析包括来自 50 个州的 1,450 个观测值,时间跨度为 1991-2019 年。采用弹性网络回归技术分析了政策变量与枪支自杀率之间的关系。为调整模型超参数,进行了嵌套交叉验证。研究数据是在 2023 年和 2024 年收集和分析的:优化后的 ElasticNet 方法的平均 MSE 为 2.07,优于非规则化模型和虚拟回归模型。平均而言,对预测持枪自杀率影响最大的政策包括要求销售手枪的枪支经销商必须持有州执照的法律,以及要求个人通过包括执法部门在内的审批程序获得枪支购买许可的法律等:平均而言,在实施了各项有影响力政策的州年,枪支自杀率较低。值得注意的是,这些分析都是生态分析,不存在因果关系。不过,本研究能够使用具有固有特征选择和多种政策类型的监督机器学习方法,利用未见数据进行预测(即平衡 Lasso 和 Ridge 正则化惩罚)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Preventive Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
395
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health. Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.
期刊最新文献
Chronic Opioid Use Following Implementation of Oregon's Medicaid Back Pain Policy. Clinician response to the 2021 USPSTF recommendation for colorectal cancer screening in average risk adults aged 45-49 years. Cost-effectiveness of mandating calorie labels on prepared foods in supermarkets. Disparities in tobacco smoking and risk of cardiovascular disease in people with low socioeconomic status or serious psychological distress: A simulation analysis. Factors associated with mental healthcare utilization among United States military personnel with posttraumatic stress disorder or depression symptoms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1