Analysis of the correlation between the Systemic Inflammatory Response Index and the severity of coronary vasculopathy.

0 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Biomolecules & biomedicine Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.17305/bb.2024.10747
Ting He, Yinhua Luo, Jingjing Wan, Ling Hou, Ke Su, Jinbo Zhao, Yuanhong Li
{"title":"Analysis of the correlation between the Systemic Inflammatory Response Index and the severity of coronary vasculopathy.","authors":"Ting He, Yinhua Luo, Jingjing Wan, Ling Hou, Ke Su, Jinbo Zhao, Yuanhong Li","doi":"10.17305/bb.2024.10747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to analyze the correlation between Systemic Inflammatory Response Index (SIRI) and the severity of coronary artery stenosis in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). It also aims to assess the predictive value of SIRI for the severity of coronary artery stenosis. A total of 2990 patients who underwent coronary angiography were included in this study. The Gensini score was used to estimate the severity of coronary vascular lesions. The predictive ability of SIRI for CHD was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Binary multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to predict the likelihood of CHD based on the SIRI index. The results showed that people with higher SIRI were more likely to have CHD (P < 0.001). After controlling for other risk factors, the highest quartile had a significantly higher incidence of coronary artery disease compared to the lowest quartile (odds ratio [OR] 2.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.73-3.92, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the Gensini score was significantly higher in the fourth quartile group (T4) compared to the first (T1) and second (T2) quartile groups (P < 0.001). Additionally, the SIRI was significantly higher in the group with severe coronary artery lesions compared to the mild and moderate groups (P < 0.001). The SIRI also showed a higher predictive ability for the extent of coronary lesions under the ROC curve compared to other commonly used markers, including platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (P < 0.001). Therefore, SIRI positively correlates with coronary artery stenosis in CHD patients, serving as an effective early screening marker for assessing stenosis severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":72398,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecules & biomedicine","volume":" ","pages":"1726-1734"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11496849/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecules & biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17305/bb.2024.10747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the correlation between Systemic Inflammatory Response Index (SIRI) and the severity of coronary artery stenosis in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). It also aims to assess the predictive value of SIRI for the severity of coronary artery stenosis. A total of 2990 patients who underwent coronary angiography were included in this study. The Gensini score was used to estimate the severity of coronary vascular lesions. The predictive ability of SIRI for CHD was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Binary multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to predict the likelihood of CHD based on the SIRI index. The results showed that people with higher SIRI were more likely to have CHD (P < 0.001). After controlling for other risk factors, the highest quartile had a significantly higher incidence of coronary artery disease compared to the lowest quartile (odds ratio [OR] 2.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.73-3.92, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the Gensini score was significantly higher in the fourth quartile group (T4) compared to the first (T1) and second (T2) quartile groups (P < 0.001). Additionally, the SIRI was significantly higher in the group with severe coronary artery lesions compared to the mild and moderate groups (P < 0.001). The SIRI also showed a higher predictive ability for the extent of coronary lesions under the ROC curve compared to other commonly used markers, including platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (P < 0.001). Therefore, SIRI positively correlates with coronary artery stenosis in CHD patients, serving as an effective early screening marker for assessing stenosis severity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全身炎症反应指数与冠状动脉血管病变严重程度的相关性分析。
本研究旨在分析冠心病患者全身炎症反应指数(SIRI)与冠状动脉狭窄严重程度之间的相关性。研究还旨在评估 SIRI 对冠状动脉狭窄严重程度的预测价值。本研究共纳入了 2990 名接受冠状动脉造影术的患者。Gensini 评分用于估算冠状动脉血管病变的严重程度。使用接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)评估了 SIRI 对冠心病的预测能力。采用二元多变量逻辑回归分析,根据 SIRI 指数预测罹患冠心病的可能性。结果显示,SIRI指数越高的人患冠心病的可能性越大(P < 0.001)。在控制了其他风险因素后,与最低四分位数相比,最高四分位数的冠心病发病率明显更高(比值比 [OR] 2.25,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.73-3.92,P < 0.001)。此外,与第一四分位组(T1)和第二四分位组(T2)相比,第四四分位组(T4)的 Gensini 评分明显更高(P < 0.001)。此外,与轻度和中度组相比,严重冠状动脉病变组的 SIRI 指数明显更高(P < 0.001)。与其他常用指标(包括血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)、单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值(MLR)和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR))相比,SIRI 指数在 ROC 曲线下对冠状动脉病变程度的预测能力也更高(P < 0.001)。因此,SIRI 指数与冠心病患者的冠状动脉狭窄呈正相关,是评估狭窄严重程度的有效早期筛查指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical profile and risk factors for respiratory failure in children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Association between diabetes mellitus and tinnitus: A meta-analysis. Long-term smoking contributes to aging frailty and inflammatory response. Deep learning approach based on a patch residual for pediatric supracondylar subtle fracture detection. The molecular mechanisms of cuproptosis and its relevance to atherosclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1