No mess with mesh; vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) autologous posterior rectus fascia mesh for vaginal urinary incontinence procedures
Jan Baekelandt , Anne-Sophie Vertongen , Luka Matak , Andrea Stuart
{"title":"No mess with mesh; vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) autologous posterior rectus fascia mesh for vaginal urinary incontinence procedures","authors":"Jan Baekelandt , Anne-Sophie Vertongen , Luka Matak , Andrea Stuart","doi":"10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Urinary incontinence affects 25–45 % of women with the gold standard surgical approach being placement of mid-urethral synthetic slings; tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) and trans-obturator tape (TOT). Due to the controversies regarding vaginal mesh the last decade, an increasing demand has evolved for incontinence treatment without vaginal synthetic mesh. The short term results of autologous rectus fascia sling for TOT surgery have shown similar success rates compared to those after the use of synthetic mesh, but the harvesting of the mesh is less minimally invasive and is associated with longer surgical time.</p><p>vNOTES is a combination of a vaginal entrance to the abdomen and endoscopy via the vagina.</p><p>The aim with the video is to show a new surgical technique with a fully vaginal, scarless vNOTES approach for harvesting the posterior rectus fascia for TVT and TOT procedures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","volume":"53 8","pages":"Article 102816"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784724000941/pdfft?md5=01ff517dce0e69d3a5e5a76f3b0d9037&pid=1-s2.0-S2468784724000941-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784724000941","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Urinary incontinence affects 25–45 % of women with the gold standard surgical approach being placement of mid-urethral synthetic slings; tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) and trans-obturator tape (TOT). Due to the controversies regarding vaginal mesh the last decade, an increasing demand has evolved for incontinence treatment without vaginal synthetic mesh. The short term results of autologous rectus fascia sling for TOT surgery have shown similar success rates compared to those after the use of synthetic mesh, but the harvesting of the mesh is less minimally invasive and is associated with longer surgical time.
vNOTES is a combination of a vaginal entrance to the abdomen and endoscopy via the vagina.
The aim with the video is to show a new surgical technique with a fully vaginal, scarless vNOTES approach for harvesting the posterior rectus fascia for TVT and TOT procedures.
25%-45%的女性患有尿失禁,金标准手术方法是放置尿道中段合成吊带、无张力阴道胶带(TVT)和经尿道胶带(TOT)。近十年来,由于有关阴道网片的争议不断,对无阴道合成网片治疗尿失禁的需求日益增长。自体直肌筋膜吊带用于 TOT 手术的短期效果显示,其成功率与使用合成网片后的成功率相似,但网片的采集是一种微创手术,手术时间较长。视频的目的是展示一种新的手术技术,采用完全阴道、无疤痕的 vNOTES 方法为 TVT 和 TOT 手术采集后直肌筋膜。
期刊介绍:
Formerly known as Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction is the official Academic publication of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français / CNGOF).
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod publishes monthly, in English, research papers and techniques in the fields of Gynecology, Obstetrics, Neonatology and Human Reproduction: (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, updates, technical notes, case reports, letters to the editor and guidelines.
Original works include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.