Analysis of the Accuracy of CAM-type Deformity Resection on a Low-cost Arthroscopic Simulator in a Training Scenario.

Q3 Medicine Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia Pub Date : 2024-06-22 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1785666
Bruno Gonçalves Schroder E Souza, Vitor Homero Vieira, Marcos Miranda, Luiz Guilherme Vidal Assad de Carvalho, Flavia de Souza Bastos, João Vitor Delgado Vilas Boas
{"title":"Analysis of the Accuracy of CAM-type Deformity Resection on a Low-cost Arthroscopic Simulator in a Training Scenario.","authors":"Bruno Gonçalves Schroder E Souza, Vitor Homero Vieira, Marcos Miranda, Luiz Guilherme Vidal Assad de Carvalho, Flavia de Souza Bastos, João Vitor Delgado Vilas Boas","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1785666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b> To evaluate surgeons' performance in resecting CAM-type deformities using a realistic arthroscopic surgery simulator. <b>Methods</b> An arthroscopic simulator was created using low-cost materials with the help of a GTMax Core A1 3D printer and the programs Invesalius and Meshmixer 2017, which were used to develop femoral head parts in ABS material, with the presence of a CAM-type deformity, to mimic a femoroacetabular impact situation. After the operations were performed by 16 surgeons, the femurs were compared to a previous model with deformity and another without, using Cloudcompare, and parameters such as the volumetric difference between the operated femurs, with and without deformity, the minimum and maximum distance between them, the percentage of the deformity resected, the estimated time for total resection of the deformity, as well as a qualitative analysis based on the images and graphs provided by the program representing the areas of the parts resected, were evaluated at the end. <b>Results</b> The average resection speed was 34.66 mm <sup>3</sup> /min (SD = 46 mm <sup>3</sup> /min, max = 147.33; min = -2.66). The average resection rate was 26.2% (SD = 34.7%, max = 111; min = -2). Qualitative analysis showed hyporesection of deformities and sometimes hyperresection of nondeformed areas. The simulator was highly rated by the surgeons, with a tactile sensation very similar to real surgery, according to them. <b>Conclusion</b> Arthroscopic simulators have proved very useful in training less experienced surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":21536,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia","volume":"59 3","pages":"e449-e455"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11193573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1785666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To evaluate surgeons' performance in resecting CAM-type deformities using a realistic arthroscopic surgery simulator. Methods An arthroscopic simulator was created using low-cost materials with the help of a GTMax Core A1 3D printer and the programs Invesalius and Meshmixer 2017, which were used to develop femoral head parts in ABS material, with the presence of a CAM-type deformity, to mimic a femoroacetabular impact situation. After the operations were performed by 16 surgeons, the femurs were compared to a previous model with deformity and another without, using Cloudcompare, and parameters such as the volumetric difference between the operated femurs, with and without deformity, the minimum and maximum distance between them, the percentage of the deformity resected, the estimated time for total resection of the deformity, as well as a qualitative analysis based on the images and graphs provided by the program representing the areas of the parts resected, were evaluated at the end. Results The average resection speed was 34.66 mm 3 /min (SD = 46 mm 3 /min, max = 147.33; min = -2.66). The average resection rate was 26.2% (SD = 34.7%, max = 111; min = -2). Qualitative analysis showed hyporesection of deformities and sometimes hyperresection of nondeformed areas. The simulator was highly rated by the surgeons, with a tactile sensation very similar to real surgery, according to them. Conclusion Arthroscopic simulators have proved very useful in training less experienced surgeons.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在低成本关节镜模拟器上分析训练场景中 CAM 型畸形切除术的准确性。
目的 评估外科医生使用逼真的关节镜手术模拟器切除 CAM 型畸形的效果。方法 利用 GTMax Core A1 3D 打印机和 Invesalius 和 Meshmixer 2017 程序,使用低成本材料制作关节镜模拟器,并使用 ABS 材料制作股骨头部件,其中存在 CAM 型畸形,以模拟股骨髋臼撞击情况。16 名外科医生完成手术后,使用 Cloudcompare 将股骨与之前有畸形的模型和无畸形的模型进行比较,最后根据程序提供的图像和图表对手术股骨(有畸形和无畸形)的体积差异、两者之间的最小和最大距离、切除畸形的百分比、全部切除畸形的预计时间等参数进行评估,并对切除部分的面积进行定性分析。结果 平均切除速度为 34.66 mm 3 /min(SD = 46 mm 3 /min,最大 = 147.33;最小 = -2.66)。平均切除率为 26.2%(SD = 34.7%,最大 = 111;最小 = -2)。定性分析显示,畸形切除率偏低,有时非畸形区域切除率偏高。外科医生对模拟器的评价很高,认为其触感与真实手术非常相似。结论 关节镜模拟器对于培训经验不足的外科医生非常有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
142
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hip Hemiarthroplasty in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Case Series and Review of the Literature. Long-term Outcomes 18 Years after the Arthroscopic Fixation of a Scapular Articular Fracture: A Case Report. Malunion in a Self-stabilized Fracture of the Odontoid Process Type II with a Chronic Anterior Atlantoaxial Subluxation in a Neurologically Intact Patient: A Case Report. Reichel Syndrome in Children: A Case Report. Minimally-invasive Distal Metatarsal Diaphyseal Osteotomy in the Treatment of Plantar Ulcer in the Diabetic Foot: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1