Qualitative Analysis of Inquiries Received by FDA Regarding Conduct of Clinical Trials during the Covid-19 Public Health Emergency.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1007/s43441-024-00674-x
Marijo Kambere, Hong Vu, Dana Kappel, Kukhwa Oh, Philip Budashewitz, John Concato
{"title":"Qualitative Analysis of Inquiries Received by FDA Regarding Conduct of Clinical Trials during the Covid-19 Public Health Emergency.","authors":"Marijo Kambere, Hong Vu, Dana Kappel, Kukhwa Oh, Philip Budashewitz, John Concato","doi":"10.1007/s43441-024-00674-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This report describes the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) experience in establishing a dedicated mailbox, and in publishing related guidance, to address concerns among interested parties regarding the conduct of clinical trials during the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six hundred and thirty-four mailbox inquiries were received from March 2020 through February 2022. Qualitative methods were used to provide a structured description of, and identify common themes among, these inquiries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most inquiries came from U.S.-based interested parties, including sponsors, industry trade associations, academic institutions, hospitals, clinics, research sites, trial participants, and individual persons. Approximately one-fifth of questions were related directly to COVID-19 (e.g., proposals for treatment); other inquiries were related to conduct of routine trial-related activities, and concerns were often focused on maintaining compliance with good clinical practice. In March 2020, FDA published a guidance titled Conduct of Clinical Trials of Medical Products During the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency; the document was subsequently revised eight times based in part on issues raised in mailbox inquiries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The dedicated mailbox enabled expedited communication among invested parties during the COVID-19 PHE; FDA also provided updates of the aforementioned guidance. These efforts supported the continuance of ongoing trials and the initiation of new trials during the PHE in accordance with good clinical practice guidelines, thereby helping to ensure the safety of trial participants while maintaining the quality of trial data. By soliciting and responding to trial-related inquiries and addressing corresponding needs and concerns, FDA improved transparency and communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":" ","pages":"987-995"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11335776/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-024-00674-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This report describes the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) experience in establishing a dedicated mailbox, and in publishing related guidance, to address concerns among interested parties regarding the conduct of clinical trials during the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE).

Methods: Six hundred and thirty-four mailbox inquiries were received from March 2020 through February 2022. Qualitative methods were used to provide a structured description of, and identify common themes among, these inquiries.

Results: Most inquiries came from U.S.-based interested parties, including sponsors, industry trade associations, academic institutions, hospitals, clinics, research sites, trial participants, and individual persons. Approximately one-fifth of questions were related directly to COVID-19 (e.g., proposals for treatment); other inquiries were related to conduct of routine trial-related activities, and concerns were often focused on maintaining compliance with good clinical practice. In March 2020, FDA published a guidance titled Conduct of Clinical Trials of Medical Products During the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency; the document was subsequently revised eight times based in part on issues raised in mailbox inquiries.

Conclusions: The dedicated mailbox enabled expedited communication among invested parties during the COVID-19 PHE; FDA also provided updates of the aforementioned guidance. These efforts supported the continuance of ongoing trials and the initiation of new trials during the PHE in accordance with good clinical practice guidelines, thereby helping to ensure the safety of trial participants while maintaining the quality of trial data. By soliciting and responding to trial-related inquiries and addressing corresponding needs and concerns, FDA improved transparency and communication.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FDA 收到的有关在 Covid-19 公共卫生紧急事件期间开展临床试验的询问的定性分析。
背景:本报告介绍了美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)为解决有关各方对在 COVID-19 公共卫生紧急事件(PHE)期间开展临床试验的担忧而设立专用邮箱并发布相关指南的经验:方法:从 2020 年 3 月到 2022 年 2 月,共收到 634 次邮箱咨询。采用定性方法对这些咨询进行结构化描述,并找出其中的共同主题:大多数咨询来自美国的相关方,包括赞助商、行业贸易协会、学术机构、医院、诊所、研究机构、试验参与者和个人。约五分之一的问题与 COVID-19 直接相关(如治疗建议);其他咨询与开展常规试验相关活动有关,关注点通常集中在保持良好临床实践的合规性上。2020 年 3 月,FDA 发布了题为《在 COVID-19 公共卫生紧急事件期间开展医疗产品临床试验》的指南;随后,该文件根据邮箱查询中提出的部分问题进行了八次修订:在 COVID-19 公共卫生紧急事件期间,专用邮箱加快了投资各方之间的沟通;FDA 还对上述指南进行了更新。这些努力支持了在 PHE 期间按照良好临床实践指南继续进行正在进行的试验和启动新的试验,从而有助于确保试验参与者的安全,同时保持试验数据的质量。通过征求和回应与试验有关的询问,并解决相应的需求和关切,食品和药物管理局提高了透明度,加强了沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Borrowing Methods for Incorporating Historical Data in Single-Arm Phase II Clinical Trials. Testing the Feasibility of a Digital Point of Care Solution for the Trusted Near Real-Time Bidirectional Exchange of Novel and Informative Adverse Event Information. Better Medicines for Children: Lessons Learnt and Share Learnings at the EFGCP Annual Paediatric Conferences. An Analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database for MAGnetic Expansion Control Spinal Rods. Principles for Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Ceramic Dental Implants in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1