Workflow analysis of breast cancer treatment decision-making: challenges and opportunities for informatics to support patient-centered cancer care.

IF 2.5 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JAMIA Open Pub Date : 2024-06-21 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae053
Megan E Salwei, Carrie Reale
{"title":"Workflow analysis of breast cancer treatment decision-making: challenges and opportunities for informatics to support patient-centered cancer care.","authors":"Megan E Salwei, Carrie Reale","doi":"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Decision support can improve shared decision-making for breast cancer treatment, but workflow barriers have hindered widespread use of these tools. The goal of this study was to understand the workflow among breast cancer teams of clinicians, patients, and their family caregivers when making treatment decisions and identify design guidelines for informatics tools to better support treatment decision-making.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted observations of breast cancer clinicians during routine clinical care from February to August 2022. Guided by the work system model, a human factors engineering model that describes the elements of work, we recorded all aspects of clinician workflow using a tablet and smart pencil. Observation notes were transcribed and uploaded into Dedoose. Two researchers inductively coded the observations. We identified themes relevant to the design of decision support that we classified into the 4 components of workflow (ie, flow of information, tasks, tools and technologies, and people).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We conducted 20 observations of breast cancer clinicians (total: 79 hours). We identified 10 themes related to workflow that present challenges and opportunities for decision support design. We identified approximately 48 different decisions discussed during breast cancer visits. These decisions were often interdependent and involved collaboration across the large cancer treatment team. Numerous patient-specific factors (eg, work, hobbies, family situation) were discussed when making treatment decisions as well as complex risk and clinical information. Patients were frequently asked to remember and relay information across the large cancer team.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Based on these findings, we proposed design guidelines for informatics tools to support the complex workflows involved in breast cancer care. These guidelines should inform the design of informatics solutions to better support breast cancer decision-making and improve patient-centered cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":36278,"journal":{"name":"JAMIA Open","volume":"7 2","pages":"ooae053"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11192055/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMIA Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Decision support can improve shared decision-making for breast cancer treatment, but workflow barriers have hindered widespread use of these tools. The goal of this study was to understand the workflow among breast cancer teams of clinicians, patients, and their family caregivers when making treatment decisions and identify design guidelines for informatics tools to better support treatment decision-making.

Materials and methods: We conducted observations of breast cancer clinicians during routine clinical care from February to August 2022. Guided by the work system model, a human factors engineering model that describes the elements of work, we recorded all aspects of clinician workflow using a tablet and smart pencil. Observation notes were transcribed and uploaded into Dedoose. Two researchers inductively coded the observations. We identified themes relevant to the design of decision support that we classified into the 4 components of workflow (ie, flow of information, tasks, tools and technologies, and people).

Results: We conducted 20 observations of breast cancer clinicians (total: 79 hours). We identified 10 themes related to workflow that present challenges and opportunities for decision support design. We identified approximately 48 different decisions discussed during breast cancer visits. These decisions were often interdependent and involved collaboration across the large cancer treatment team. Numerous patient-specific factors (eg, work, hobbies, family situation) were discussed when making treatment decisions as well as complex risk and clinical information. Patients were frequently asked to remember and relay information across the large cancer team.

Discussion and conclusion: Based on these findings, we proposed design guidelines for informatics tools to support the complex workflows involved in breast cancer care. These guidelines should inform the design of informatics solutions to better support breast cancer decision-making and improve patient-centered cancer care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺癌治疗决策的工作流程分析:信息学在支持以患者为中心的癌症护理方面面临的挑战和机遇。
目的:决策支持可改善乳腺癌治疗的共同决策,但工作流程障碍阻碍了这些工具的广泛使用。本研究旨在了解由临床医生、患者及其家庭护理人员组成的乳腺癌团队在做出治疗决策时的工作流程,并确定信息学工具的设计指南,以更好地支持治疗决策:我们在 2022 年 2 月至 8 月期间对乳腺癌临床医生进行了常规临床护理观察。在工作系统模型(一种描述工作要素的人因工程模型)的指导下,我们使用平板电脑和智能笔记录了临床医生工作流程的各个方面。观察记录被转录并上传至 Dedoose。两名研究人员对观察结果进行归纳编码。我们确定了与决策支持设计相关的主题,并将其归类为工作流程的 4 个组成部分(即信息流、任务、工具和技术以及人员):我们对乳腺癌临床医生进行了 20 次观察(共计 79 小时)。我们确定了与工作流程相关的 10 个主题,这些主题为决策支持设计带来了挑战和机遇。我们确定了乳腺癌就诊过程中讨论的约 48 个不同决策。这些决定往往相互依赖,涉及到大型癌症治疗团队的协作。在做出治疗决定以及复杂的风险和临床信息时,我们讨论了许多患者的特定因素(如工作、爱好、家庭状况)。患者经常被要求记住并在大型癌症治疗团队中传递信息:基于这些发现,我们提出了信息学工具的设计指南,以支持乳腺癌护理中涉及的复杂工作流程。这些指南将为信息学解决方案的设计提供参考,从而更好地支持乳腺癌决策,改善以患者为中心的癌症护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMIA Open
JAMIA Open Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
102
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Aligning prediction models with clinical information needs: infant sepsis case study. Semantic enrichment of Pomeranian health study data using LOINC and WHO-FIC terminology mapping principles. Exploring beyond diagnoses in electronic health records to improve discovery: a review of the phenome-wide association study. Toward digital caregiving network interventions for children with medical complexity living in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods. Transforming appeal decisions: machine learning triage for hospital admission denials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1