Electromyography and range-of-motion measurements in German soldiers wearing different types of body armour while marching.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Bmj Military Health Pub Date : 2024-06-23 DOI:10.1136/military-2023-002618
Patricia Lang, M Amann, H-J Riesner, B Friemert, H Siebers, M Betsch, H-G Palm
{"title":"Electromyography and range-of-motion measurements in German soldiers wearing different types of body armour while marching.","authors":"Patricia Lang, M Amann, H-J Riesner, B Friemert, H Siebers, M Betsch, H-G Palm","doi":"10.1136/military-2023-002618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In this study, we used surface electromyography (EMG) electrodes in order to measure and compare activity in the neck, back and thigh muscles of soldiers wearing two different types of body armour. A secondary objective was to analyse shoulder and hip ranges of motion using inertial motion sensors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fourteen male soldiers were instructed to march 6 km on a treadmill while wearing different types of body armour. All participants wore shorts and a T-shirt and the same size vest regardless of their body size. We measured back and thigh muscle activity as well as shoulder and hip ranges of motion at regular intervals during the march.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the course of a 6 km march, muscle activity was already increased to 1.3 to 2.0 times after putting on the vest and increased by up to 13 times during the march with equipment. The new vest with hip belt required higher levels of muscle activity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Body armour with hip belt placed higher levels of stress on back and neck muscles during a 6 km march than without. There was no major difference between the two types of body armour in terms of thigh muscle activity.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>DRKS00016005.</p>","PeriodicalId":48485,"journal":{"name":"Bmj Military Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bmj Military Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2023-002618","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In this study, we used surface electromyography (EMG) electrodes in order to measure and compare activity in the neck, back and thigh muscles of soldiers wearing two different types of body armour. A secondary objective was to analyse shoulder and hip ranges of motion using inertial motion sensors.

Methods: Fourteen male soldiers were instructed to march 6 km on a treadmill while wearing different types of body armour. All participants wore shorts and a T-shirt and the same size vest regardless of their body size. We measured back and thigh muscle activity as well as shoulder and hip ranges of motion at regular intervals during the march.

Results: Over the course of a 6 km march, muscle activity was already increased to 1.3 to 2.0 times after putting on the vest and increased by up to 13 times during the march with equipment. The new vest with hip belt required higher levels of muscle activity.

Conclusions: Body armour with hip belt placed higher levels of stress on back and neck muscles during a 6 km march than without. There was no major difference between the two types of body armour in terms of thigh muscle activity.

Trial registration number: DRKS00016005.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对穿着不同类型防弹衣的德国士兵行军时的肌电图和运动范围进行测量。
简介在这项研究中,我们使用表面肌电图(EMG)电极来测量和比较穿着两种不同类型防弹衣的士兵的颈部、背部和大腿肌肉活动情况。次要目标是使用惯性运动传感器分析肩部和臀部的运动范围:方法:14 名男性士兵被要求穿着不同类型的防弹衣在跑步机上行进 6 公里。所有参与者都穿着短裤、T恤和相同尺寸的防弹背心,与体型无关。在行进过程中,我们定时测量背部和大腿肌肉活动以及肩关节和髋关节的活动范围:结果:在 6 公里的行进过程中,穿上背心后肌肉活动量已增加了 1.3 至 2.0 倍,而在穿戴装备行进过程中,肌肉活动量最多增加了 13 倍。结论:结论:在 6 公里行军过程中,带臀带的防弹背心对背部和颈部肌肉造成的压力高于不带臀带的防弹背心。在大腿肌肉活动方面,两种类型的防弹背心没有很大区别:DRKS00016005.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bmj Military Health
Bmj Military Health MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
116
期刊最新文献
Removal of tourniquets: the next step in saving lives and limbs. Development and validation of prediction models for prehospital triage of military trauma patients. Prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales and carbapenemase-resistant Enterobacterales in British military cohorts. Importance of strength training for sustaining performance and health in military personnel. Biomechanical and physiological biomarkers are useful indicators of military personnel readiness: a multi-institutional, multinational research collaboration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1