Predictors of functional outcomes following spinal meningioma surgery. A single-center retrospective experience of 59 cases

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurochirurgie Pub Date : 2024-06-22 DOI:10.1016/j.neuchi.2024.101577
Meissa Hamza , Angela Elia , Luca Paun , Benoit Hudelist , Xavier Schumacher , Marco Demasi , Catherine Oppenheim , Fabrice Chretien , Marc Zanello , Alexandre Roux , Johan Pallud
{"title":"Predictors of functional outcomes following spinal meningioma surgery. A single-center retrospective experience of 59 cases","authors":"Meissa Hamza ,&nbsp;Angela Elia ,&nbsp;Luca Paun ,&nbsp;Benoit Hudelist ,&nbsp;Xavier Schumacher ,&nbsp;Marco Demasi ,&nbsp;Catherine Oppenheim ,&nbsp;Fabrice Chretien ,&nbsp;Marc Zanello ,&nbsp;Alexandre Roux ,&nbsp;Johan Pallud","doi":"10.1016/j.neuchi.2024.101577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To better predict the postoperative functional outcomes of patients operated on for a spinal meningioma, we assessed: 1) the prevalence of good and poor postoperative functional outcomes following surgery; 2) the impact of age and frailty on postoperative functional outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this retrospective cohort study, we screened adult patients operated on for a spinal meningioma from 2005 to 2022. Inclusion criteria were: 1) patients ≥18 years; 2) histopathological diagnosis of meningioma; 3) location to the cervical, thoracic or lumbar spine (foramen magnum meningioma excluded); 4) surgery as first-line treatment; and 5) available postoperative follow-up ≥1 year. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the modified McCormick scale preoperatively and at one-year of postoperative follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In this single institution experience of 59 cases, we found that: 1) surgical resection positively impacts patients’ functional outcomes, 91.2% either showing an improved or maintained good postoperative neurological status defined by a modified McCormick scale score ≤ II; 2) a good modified McCormick scale status was achieved in 84.2% of patients at one postoperative year; 3) 87.5% of patients who were not improved postoperatively maintained an overall good neurological status defined by a modified McCormick scale score ≤ II; and 4) frail or aged patients were not at a higher risk of poor postoperative functional outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Surgical resection positively impacts outcomes of patients operated for a spinal meningioma. Sex, presence of a meningioma-related myelopathy, extent of resection, and occurrence of surgery-related postoperative complications, but not age or frailty, predict postoperative functional outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51141,"journal":{"name":"Neurochirurgie","volume":"70 5","pages":"Article 101577"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurochirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028377024000481","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

To better predict the postoperative functional outcomes of patients operated on for a spinal meningioma, we assessed: 1) the prevalence of good and poor postoperative functional outcomes following surgery; 2) the impact of age and frailty on postoperative functional outcomes.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we screened adult patients operated on for a spinal meningioma from 2005 to 2022. Inclusion criteria were: 1) patients ≥18 years; 2) histopathological diagnosis of meningioma; 3) location to the cervical, thoracic or lumbar spine (foramen magnum meningioma excluded); 4) surgery as first-line treatment; and 5) available postoperative follow-up ≥1 year. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the modified McCormick scale preoperatively and at one-year of postoperative follow-up.

Results

In this single institution experience of 59 cases, we found that: 1) surgical resection positively impacts patients’ functional outcomes, 91.2% either showing an improved or maintained good postoperative neurological status defined by a modified McCormick scale score ≤ II; 2) a good modified McCormick scale status was achieved in 84.2% of patients at one postoperative year; 3) 87.5% of patients who were not improved postoperatively maintained an overall good neurological status defined by a modified McCormick scale score ≤ II; and 4) frail or aged patients were not at a higher risk of poor postoperative functional outcomes.

Conclusion

Surgical resection positively impacts outcomes of patients operated for a spinal meningioma. Sex, presence of a meningioma-related myelopathy, extent of resection, and occurrence of surgery-related postoperative complications, but not age or frailty, predict postoperative functional outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊髓脑膜瘤术后功能预后的预测因素。单中心 59 例病例的回顾性经验。
背景:为了更好地预测脊髓脑膜瘤手术患者的术后功能预后,我们对以下方面进行了评估:1)术后功能预后良好和不良的发生率;2)年龄和体弱对术后功能预后的影响:1)术后良好和不良功能预后的发生率;2)年龄和虚弱对术后功能预后的影响:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们筛选了 2005 年至 2022 年期间接受脊髓脑膜瘤手术的成年患者。纳入标准为1)患者年龄≥18岁;2)组织病理学诊断为脑膜瘤;3)病变部位为颈椎、胸椎或腰椎(枕骨大孔脑膜瘤除外);4)手术为一线治疗;5)术后随访时间≥1年。采用改良麦考密克量表评估术前和术后一年随访的临床结果:结果:在单个机构的 59 例病例中,我们发现1)手术切除对患者的功能预后有积极影响,91.2%的患者术后神经功能状况有所改善或保持良好,改良麦考密克量表评分≤II;2)84.2%的患者术后一年改良麦考密克量表评分达到良好。2%的患者在术后一年达到良好的改良麦考密克量表状态;3)87.5%术后未见好转的患者保持了总体良好的神经状态,定义为改良麦考密克量表评分≤II;4)体弱或高龄患者术后功能结果不佳的风险并不高:结论:手术切除对脊髓脑膜瘤患者的预后有积极影响。性别、是否存在与脑膜瘤相关的脊髓病变、切除范围以及术后相关并发症的发生情况都能预测术后功能预后,而年龄或体弱情况则不能预测术后功能预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurochirurgie
Neurochirurgie 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
100
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Neurochirurgie publishes articles on treatment, teaching and research, neurosurgery training and the professional aspects of our discipline, and also the history and progress of neurosurgery. It focuses on pathologies of the head, spine and central and peripheral nervous systems and their vascularization. All aspects of the specialty are dealt with: trauma, tumor, degenerative disease, infection, vascular pathology, and radiosurgery, and pediatrics. Transversal studies are also welcome: neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neurology, neuropediatrics, psychiatry, neuropsychology, physical medicine and neurologic rehabilitation, neuro-anesthesia, neurologic intensive care, neuroradiology, functional exploration, neuropathology, neuro-ophthalmology, otoneurology, maxillofacial surgery, neuro-endocrinology and spine surgery. Technical and methodological aspects are also taken onboard: diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, methods for assessing results, epidemiology, surgical, interventional and radiological techniques, simulations and pathophysiological hypotheses, and educational tools. The editorial board may refuse submissions that fail to meet the journal''s aims and scope; such studies will not be peer-reviewed, and the editor in chief will promptly inform the corresponding author, so as not to delay submission to a more suitable journal. With a view to attracting an international audience of both readers and writers, Neurochirurgie especially welcomes articles in English, and gives priority to original studies. Other kinds of article - reviews, case reports, technical notes and meta-analyses - are equally published. Every year, a special edition is dedicated to the topic selected by the French Society of Neurosurgery for its annual report.
期刊最新文献
Lies, damned lies, and statistical populations Staged ECA-RA-MCA bypass and interventional trapping: application of hybrid vascular reconstruction of ruptured complex tandem aneurysms Natural course of the acute unruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissections which show pearl-and-string sign Understanding statistical populations and inferences Neurosurgery in a Pacific archipelago: how to provide optimal care. Experience of the opening of a first-line neurosurgery department
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1