Evaluating limited biopsy templates for men with markedly elevated PSAs.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Canadian Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-06-01
Nikola C Teslovich, Peter Elliott, Christopher S Elliott
{"title":"Evaluating limited biopsy templates for men with markedly elevated PSAs.","authors":"Nikola C Teslovich, Peter Elliott, Christopher S Elliott","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To define the smallest prostate needle biopsy (PNB) template necessary for accurate tissue diagnosis in men with markedly elevated PSA while decreasing procedural morbidity.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We performed a chart review of 80 men presenting with a newly elevated PSA > 100 ng/mL who underwent biopsy (PNB or metastatic site). For patients who underwent a full 12-core biopsy, simulated templates of 2- to 10-cores were generated by randomly drawing subsets of biopsies from their full-template findings. Templates were iterated to randomize core location and generate theoretical smaller template outcomes. Simulated biopsy results were compared to full-template findings to determine accuracy to maximal Grade Group (GG) diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Amongst those that underwent PNB, 93% had GG 4 or 5 disease. Twenty-two (40%) underwent a full 12-core biopsy, 20 (37%) a 6-core biopsy, and only 8 (15%) had fewer than six biopsy cores sampled at our hospital. Simulated templates with 2-, 4-, 6-, and 8-cores correctly diagnosed prostate cancer in all patients, and accurately identified the maximal GG in 82%, 91%, 95%, and 97% of patients, respectively. The biopsy locations most likely to detect maximal GG were medial mid and base sites bilaterally. A 4-core template of these sites would have accurately detected the maximal GG in 95% of patients relative to a full 12-core template.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In men presenting with PSA > 100 ng/mL, decreasing from a 12-core to a 4-core prostate biopsy template results in universal cancer detection and minimal under-grading while theoretically decreasing procedural morbidity and cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":56323,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Urology","volume":"31 3","pages":"11886-11891"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To define the smallest prostate needle biopsy (PNB) template necessary for accurate tissue diagnosis in men with markedly elevated PSA while decreasing procedural morbidity.

Materials and methods: We performed a chart review of 80 men presenting with a newly elevated PSA > 100 ng/mL who underwent biopsy (PNB or metastatic site). For patients who underwent a full 12-core biopsy, simulated templates of 2- to 10-cores were generated by randomly drawing subsets of biopsies from their full-template findings. Templates were iterated to randomize core location and generate theoretical smaller template outcomes. Simulated biopsy results were compared to full-template findings to determine accuracy to maximal Grade Group (GG) diagnosis.

Results: Amongst those that underwent PNB, 93% had GG 4 or 5 disease. Twenty-two (40%) underwent a full 12-core biopsy, 20 (37%) a 6-core biopsy, and only 8 (15%) had fewer than six biopsy cores sampled at our hospital. Simulated templates with 2-, 4-, 6-, and 8-cores correctly diagnosed prostate cancer in all patients, and accurately identified the maximal GG in 82%, 91%, 95%, and 97% of patients, respectively. The biopsy locations most likely to detect maximal GG were medial mid and base sites bilaterally. A 4-core template of these sites would have accurately detected the maximal GG in 95% of patients relative to a full 12-core template.

Conclusions: In men presenting with PSA > 100 ng/mL, decreasing from a 12-core to a 4-core prostate biopsy template results in universal cancer detection and minimal under-grading while theoretically decreasing procedural morbidity and cost.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估针对 PSAs 明显升高男性的有限活检模板。
简介:目的:确定最小的前列腺针穿刺活检(PNB)模板,以便对 PSA 明显升高的男性进行准确的组织诊断,同时降低手术死亡率:确定最小的前列腺针穿刺活检(PNB)模板,以便对PSA明显升高的男性进行准确的组织诊断,同时降低手术发病率:我们对 80 名 PSA 新近升高 > 100 ng/mL 并接受活检(PNB 或转移部位)的男性患者进行了病历审查。对于接受完整 12 核心活检的患者,我们从其完整模板结果中随机抽取活检样本,生成 2 至 10 核心的模拟模板。对模板进行迭代以随机确定核心位置,并生成理论上较小的模板结果。将模拟活检结果与全模板结果进行比较,以确定最高级别组(GG)诊断的准确性:在接受 PNB 的患者中,93% 患有 GG 4 级或 5 级疾病。22人(40%)接受了完整的12核活检,20人(37%)接受了6核活检,只有8人(15%)在本医院取样的活检核少于6个。2核、4核、6核和8核模拟模板分别在82%、91%、95%和97%的患者中正确诊断出前列腺癌,并准确识别出最大GG。最有可能检测到最大 GG 的活检位置是双侧内侧中部和底部。与完整的12核模板相比,这些部位的4核模板可准确检测出95%患者的最大GG:结论:对于 PSA > 100 纳克/毫升的男性患者,将 12 核前列腺活检模板减少到 4 核,可以普遍检测到癌症,并将分级不足的情况降至最低,同时从理论上降低了手术的发病率和成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Urology
Canadian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The CJU publishes articles of interest to the field of urology and related specialties who treat urologic diseases.
期刊最新文献
Single-port robotic laparoscopic ureterocalicostomy: surgical technique and clinical outcomes. Clinical implications of tumor laterality in renal cell carcinoma. Hypogonadism, frailty, and postoperative outcomes among men undergoing partial nephrectomy. Illuminating the use of photodynamic therapy in urologic oncology. Legends in Urology v31I06.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1