Developing a coordinated response to chemsex across health, justice and social care settings: expert consensus statement.

IF 2.2 Q3 PSYCHIATRY BJPsych Bulletin Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1192/bjb.2024.46
Bradley Hillier, Eliott Carthy, Nicola Kalk, Monty Moncrieff, Mark Pakianathan, Derek Tracy, Owen Bowden-Jones, Ford Hickson, Andrew Forrester
{"title":"Developing a coordinated response to chemsex across health, justice and social care settings: expert consensus statement.","authors":"Bradley Hillier, Eliott Carthy, Nicola Kalk, Monty Moncrieff, Mark Pakianathan, Derek Tracy, Owen Bowden-Jones, Ford Hickson, Andrew Forrester","doi":"10.1192/bjb.2024.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong>Chemsex occurs primarily among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM), and there is evidence of a subgroup of users who carry out chemsex-related criminal offences and experience harm. Challenges with chemsex can present to various settings; there are concerns that harm is increasing, including at interfaces between health, social care and criminal justice systems. The UK response to date has lacked a coordinated approach. An expert reference group was convened to share chemsex knowledge, articulate priorities for research and pathway development, and foster collaborative working between agencies. It made three key recommendations: develop and increase training and awareness across all services; implement a coordinated research programme with the development of a common data-set and assessment tool to fully characterise population-level needs; develop a professional network to share information, provide professional support and act as a knowledge hub. There was support for a unified multi-agency strategy incorporating the priorities identified as overarching principles.</p>","PeriodicalId":8883,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2024.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary: Chemsex occurs primarily among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM), and there is evidence of a subgroup of users who carry out chemsex-related criminal offences and experience harm. Challenges with chemsex can present to various settings; there are concerns that harm is increasing, including at interfaces between health, social care and criminal justice systems. The UK response to date has lacked a coordinated approach. An expert reference group was convened to share chemsex knowledge, articulate priorities for research and pathway development, and foster collaborative working between agencies. It made three key recommendations: develop and increase training and awareness across all services; implement a coordinated research programme with the development of a common data-set and assessment tool to fully characterise population-level needs; develop a professional network to share information, provide professional support and act as a knowledge hub. There was support for a unified multi-agency strategy incorporating the priorities identified as overarching principles.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在卫生、司法和社会护理领域制定协调一致的化性应对措施:专家共识声明。
摘要:化学性性行为主要发生在男同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者(GBMSM)中,有证据表明,有一部分使用者会进行与化学性性行为相关的刑事犯罪并受到伤害。化性毒品使用者可能会在各种环境中遇到困难;人们担心伤害正在增加,包括在卫生、社会保健和刑事司法系统之间。迄今为止,英国的应对措施缺乏协调一致的方法。英国召集了一个专家咨商小组,以分享性药物知识,明确研究和路径开发的优先事项,并促进机构间的合作。该小组提出了三项主要建议:在所有服务机构中开展并加强培训和提高认识活动;实施一项协调的研究计划,开发一套共同的数据和评估工具,以充分描述人口层面的需求特征;建立一个专业网络,以共享信息、提供专业支持并充当知识中心。与会者支持制定一项统一的多机构战略,将确定的优先事项作为总体原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJPsych Bulletin
BJPsych Bulletin PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
79
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BJPsych Bulletin prioritises research, opinion and informed reflection on the state of psychiatry, management of psychiatric services, and education and training in psychiatry. It provides essential reading and practical value to psychiatrists and anyone involved in the management and provision of mental healthcare.
期刊最新文献
The Royal College of Psychiatrists should become British, not Royal. Introducing medical students to cultural psychiatry: perspectives and reflections on developing and delivering an elective module. Professor Thaddeus Ulzen. Research needs of higher specialist trainees in psychiatry in Ireland: mixed methods study. Evolution and suicide: critique of the pain and brain model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1