Evaluating the accuracy of one-piece and three-piece 3D-printed indirect bonding transfer trays: An in vitro study.

IF 2.7 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dental and Medical Problems Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.17219/dmp/184145
Michał Wajda, Joanna Lis, Beata Kawala
{"title":"Evaluating the accuracy of one-piece and three-piece 3D-printed indirect bonding transfer trays: An in vitro study.","authors":"Michał Wajda, Joanna Lis, Beata Kawala","doi":"10.17219/dmp/184145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent developments in computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and 3D printing have enabled the fabrication of digital indirect bonding (IDB) transfer trays. These modern products require thorough investigation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to determine the accuracy of one-piece and three-piece IDB transfer trays in vitro.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>An initial dental scan (IDS) of a randomly selected patient with digitally positioned brackets served as the master scan (MS) for designing 16 IDB transfer trays of each type. They were 3D printed and used for bonding 448 brackets to the models. Subsequently, the models were scanned with a TRIOS® 3 Intraoral Scanner (3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark), producing actual scans (ASs). The accuracy of bracket positioning was measured digitally on both MSs and ASs. The measurements were compared to the Objective Grading System for dental casts provided by the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 2 types of IDB transfer trays showed comparable accuracy. All linear errors were within the clinically acceptable range, whereas the angular measurements demonstrated significant variability, resulting in clinically unacceptable transfer errors that ranged from 3.3% to 90.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study results cannot be unconditionally extrapolated to other types of IDB transfer trays due to the diversity of their properties and features. The study evaluated the in vitro accuracy of IDB transfer trays. The revealed number of errors may be even higher in vivo due to limitations in visibility, salivary flow, interference from the tongue, and difficulties in achieving a proper fit of the IDB transfer tray to the teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":11191,"journal":{"name":"Dental and Medical Problems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental and Medical Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/184145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent developments in computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and 3D printing have enabled the fabrication of digital indirect bonding (IDB) transfer trays. These modern products require thorough investigation.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to determine the accuracy of one-piece and three-piece IDB transfer trays in vitro.

Material and methods: An initial dental scan (IDS) of a randomly selected patient with digitally positioned brackets served as the master scan (MS) for designing 16 IDB transfer trays of each type. They were 3D printed and used for bonding 448 brackets to the models. Subsequently, the models were scanned with a TRIOS® 3 Intraoral Scanner (3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark), producing actual scans (ASs). The accuracy of bracket positioning was measured digitally on both MSs and ASs. The measurements were compared to the Objective Grading System for dental casts provided by the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO).

Results: The 2 types of IDB transfer trays showed comparable accuracy. All linear errors were within the clinically acceptable range, whereas the angular measurements demonstrated significant variability, resulting in clinically unacceptable transfer errors that ranged from 3.3% to 90.3%.

Conclusions: The study results cannot be unconditionally extrapolated to other types of IDB transfer trays due to the diversity of their properties and features. The study evaluated the in vitro accuracy of IDB transfer trays. The revealed number of errors may be even higher in vivo due to limitations in visibility, salivary flow, interference from the tongue, and difficulties in achieving a proper fit of the IDB transfer tray to the teeth.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估一片式和三片式三维打印间接粘接转移托盘的准确性:体外研究。
背景:计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)和三维打印技术的最新发展使得数字间接粘接(IDB)转移托盘的制造成为可能。需要对这些现代产品进行深入研究:研究的目的是确定单件式和三件式 IDB 转移托盘在体外的准确性:材料和方法:随机选取一名患者的初始牙科扫描(IDS)和数字定位托槽,作为设计每种类型的 16 个 IDB 转移托盘的主扫描(MS)。这些托盘是三维打印的,用于将 448 个托槽粘接到模型上。随后,使用 TRIOS® 3 口内扫描仪(3Shape A/S,丹麦哥本哈根)对模型进行扫描,生成实际扫描结果(AS)。在 MS 和 AS 上对托槽定位的准确性进行了数字测量。测量结果与美国正畸委员会(ABO)提供的牙科模型客观分级系统进行了比较:结果:两种 IDB 转移托盘的准确性相当。所有的线性误差都在临床可接受的范围内,而角度测量则表现出显著的可变性,导致临床上无法接受的转移误差从3.3%到90.3%不等:结论:由于 IDB 转运盘的性能和特点多种多样,因此研究结果不能无条件地推广到其他类型的 IDB 转运盘上。该研究评估了 IDB 转运盘的体外准确性。由于能见度、唾液流量、舌头的干扰以及 IDB 转运托盘与牙齿难以合适贴合等因素的限制,在体内显示的误差数量可能会更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Most common congenital syndromes with facial asymmetry: A narrative review. Self-assessment skills of undergraduate students in operative dentistry: Preclinical performance and gender. Optical properties of advanced lithium disilicate. Studies on the content of toxic metals in teeth: A narrative review of literature. Kinesio Taping as an alternative therapy for limited mandibular mobility with pain in female patients with temporomandibular disorders: A randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1