TOP 100 and detection of colorectal lesions in colon capsule endoscopy: more than meets the eye.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1097/MEG.0000000000002809
Tiago Lima Capela, Cátia Arieira, Sofia Xavier, Tiago Cúrdia Gonçalves, Pedro Boal Carvalho, Bruno Rosa, José Cotter
{"title":"TOP 100 and detection of colorectal lesions in colon capsule endoscopy: more than meets the eye.","authors":"Tiago Lima Capela, Cátia Arieira, Sofia Xavier, Tiago Cúrdia Gonçalves, Pedro Boal Carvalho, Bruno Rosa, José Cotter","doi":"10.1097/MEG.0000000000002809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a well-known method for the detection of colorectal lesions. Nevertheless, there are no studies reporting the accuracy of TOP 100, a CCE software tool, for the automatic detection of colorectal lesions in CCE. We aimed to evaluate the performance of TOP 100 in detecting colorectal lesions in patients submitted to CCE for incomplete colonoscopy compared with classic reading. A retrospective cohort study including adult patients submitted to CCE (PillCam COLON 2; Medtronic) for incomplete colonoscopy. Blinded for each other's evaluation, one experienced reader analyzed the TOP 100 images and the other performed classic reading to identify colorectal lesions. Detection of colorectal lesions, namely polyps, angioectasia, blood, diverticula, erosions/ulcers, neoplasia, and subepithelial lesions was assessed and TOP 100 performance was evaluated compared with the gold standard (classic reading). A total of 188 CCEs were included. Prevalence of colorectal lesions, polyps, angioectasia, blood, diverticula, erosions/ulcers, neoplasia, and subepithelial lesions were 77.7, 54.3, 8.5, 1.6, 50.0, 0.5, 0.5, and 1.1%, respectively. TOP 100 had a sensitivity of 92.5%, specificity of 69.1%, negative predictive value of 72.5%, positive predictive value of 91.2%, and accuracy of 87.2% for detecting colorectal lesions. TOP 100 had a sensitivity of 89.2%, specificity of 84.9%, negative predictive value of 86.9%, positive predictive value of 87.5%, and accuracy of 87.2% in detecting polyps. All colorectal lesions other than polyps were identified with 100% accuracy by TOP 100. TOP 100 has been shown to be a simple and useful tool in assisting the reader in the prompt identification of colorectal lesions in CCE.</p>","PeriodicalId":11999,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000002809","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a well-known method for the detection of colorectal lesions. Nevertheless, there are no studies reporting the accuracy of TOP 100, a CCE software tool, for the automatic detection of colorectal lesions in CCE. We aimed to evaluate the performance of TOP 100 in detecting colorectal lesions in patients submitted to CCE for incomplete colonoscopy compared with classic reading. A retrospective cohort study including adult patients submitted to CCE (PillCam COLON 2; Medtronic) for incomplete colonoscopy. Blinded for each other's evaluation, one experienced reader analyzed the TOP 100 images and the other performed classic reading to identify colorectal lesions. Detection of colorectal lesions, namely polyps, angioectasia, blood, diverticula, erosions/ulcers, neoplasia, and subepithelial lesions was assessed and TOP 100 performance was evaluated compared with the gold standard (classic reading). A total of 188 CCEs were included. Prevalence of colorectal lesions, polyps, angioectasia, blood, diverticula, erosions/ulcers, neoplasia, and subepithelial lesions were 77.7, 54.3, 8.5, 1.6, 50.0, 0.5, 0.5, and 1.1%, respectively. TOP 100 had a sensitivity of 92.5%, specificity of 69.1%, negative predictive value of 72.5%, positive predictive value of 91.2%, and accuracy of 87.2% for detecting colorectal lesions. TOP 100 had a sensitivity of 89.2%, specificity of 84.9%, negative predictive value of 86.9%, positive predictive value of 87.5%, and accuracy of 87.2% in detecting polyps. All colorectal lesions other than polyps were identified with 100% accuracy by TOP 100. TOP 100 has been shown to be a simple and useful tool in assisting the reader in the prompt identification of colorectal lesions in CCE.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TOP 100 和结肠胶囊内窥镜的结肠直肠病变检测:不止于此。
结肠胶囊内窥镜检查(CCE)是一种众所周知的检测结肠直肠病变的方法。然而,目前还没有研究报告 TOP 100(一种 CCE 软件工具)在 CCE 中自动检测结肠直肠病变的准确性。我们的目的是评估 TOP 100 在检测因结肠镜检查不全而接受 CCE 检查的患者结肠直肠病变方面的性能,并与传统读片方法进行比较。这是一项回顾性队列研究,包括因结肠镜检查不全而接受 CCE(PillCam COLON 2;美敦力)检查的成年患者。一名经验丰富的阅片员分析前 100 张图像,另一名阅片员进行经典阅片,以确定结肠直肠病变。对大肠病变,即息肉、血管扩张、出血、憩室、糜烂/溃疡、肿瘤和上皮下病变的检测进行评估,并将 TOP 100 的性能与金标准(经典读片)进行比较。共纳入了 188 份 CCE。结直肠病变、息肉、血管扩张、血液、憩室、糜烂/溃疡、肿瘤和上皮下病变的患病率分别为 77.7%、54.3%、8.5%、1.6%、50.0%、0.5%、0.5% 和 1.1%。TOP 100 检测结直肠病变的灵敏度为 92.5%,特异性为 69.1%,阴性预测值为 72.5%,阳性预测值为 91.2%,准确率为 87.2%。TOP 100 检测息肉的灵敏度为 89.2%,特异性为 84.9%,阴性预测值为 86.9%,阳性预测值为 87.5%,准确率为 87.2%。TOP 100 对息肉以外的所有结直肠病变的识别准确率为 100%。事实证明,TOP 100 是一种简单实用的工具,可帮助读者迅速识别 CCE 中的结直肠病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
269
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology publishes papers reporting original clinical and scientific research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes three types of manuscript: in-depth reviews (by invitation only), full papers and case reports. Manuscripts submitted to the journal will be accepted on the understanding that the author has not previously submitted the paper to another journal or had the material published elsewhere. Authors are asked to disclose any affiliations, including financial, consultant, or institutional associations, that might lead to bias or a conflict of interest.
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of a nomogram for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Western Xinjiang, China. Real-life experiences of switching from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab maintenance therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Assessment of the clinical value of five noninvasive predictors of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in Han Chinese adults. Characteristics analysis of hepatitis B core-related antigen in children with hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic viral hepatitis B infection. Compared with other methods, cyanoacrylate and lauromacrogol in treating esophagogastric varices did not increase the risk of postoperative infection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1