Preservation of orbit in tumor invasion through the periorbita in sinonasal malignancy.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1007/s00405-024-08757-z
Stepan Novak, Zuzana Balatkova, Alzbeta Fikova, Marek Grega, David Kalfert, Jan Plzak
{"title":"Preservation of orbit in tumor invasion through the periorbita in sinonasal malignancy.","authors":"Stepan Novak, Zuzana Balatkova, Alzbeta Fikova, Marek Grega, David Kalfert, Jan Plzak","doi":"10.1007/s00405-024-08757-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>One of the possible risks of sinonasal malignancy is its possible spread in the orbit. However, there is no clear consensus among the different departments as to whether it is necessary to exenterate the orbit in limited tumorous infiltration of periorbital fat. The purpose of the study was to demonstrate that periorbital infiltration and periorbital fat invasion without involvement of deeper orbital tissues are not the indication of orbital exenteration.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis was performed over a 17-year period of patients undergoing surgical treatment for sinonasal malignancy with histologically verified periorbital infiltration or deeper invasion into the orbit. A total of 32 patients were included in the study. For each group, the following data were analysed: sex, age, preoperative imaging studies, histological findings, site of origin, stage, surgical reconstruction, oncological treatment, survival, cause of death, number of recurrences in the orbit and functional status of preserved eyes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on our criteria for orbital exenteration, orbital preservation was feasible in 18 patients. Orbital exenteration was performed in 14 patients with deeper tumor infiltration. There was a statistically insignificant difference in survival between the two groups. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 44% for the orbital preservation group (only 2 patients died from local tumor recurrence) and 34% for the orbital exenteration group. The groups did not differ in other observed factors other than the extent of orbital infiltration. In 11 (61.1%) patients, vision was without significant change after radiation therapy. In 2 (11.1%) patients, visual function was impaired due to diplopia. 5 (27.8%) patients had severely impaired vision due to optic nerve atrophy after radiation therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results show a relatively high survival rate in the group of patients with orbital preservation with a high chance of vision preservation, which justifies our approach to orbital preservation even in some tumors with periorbital infiltration.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11416355/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08757-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: One of the possible risks of sinonasal malignancy is its possible spread in the orbit. However, there is no clear consensus among the different departments as to whether it is necessary to exenterate the orbit in limited tumorous infiltration of periorbital fat. The purpose of the study was to demonstrate that periorbital infiltration and periorbital fat invasion without involvement of deeper orbital tissues are not the indication of orbital exenteration.

Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis was performed over a 17-year period of patients undergoing surgical treatment for sinonasal malignancy with histologically verified periorbital infiltration or deeper invasion into the orbit. A total of 32 patients were included in the study. For each group, the following data were analysed: sex, age, preoperative imaging studies, histological findings, site of origin, stage, surgical reconstruction, oncological treatment, survival, cause of death, number of recurrences in the orbit and functional status of preserved eyes.

Results: Based on our criteria for orbital exenteration, orbital preservation was feasible in 18 patients. Orbital exenteration was performed in 14 patients with deeper tumor infiltration. There was a statistically insignificant difference in survival between the two groups. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 44% for the orbital preservation group (only 2 patients died from local tumor recurrence) and 34% for the orbital exenteration group. The groups did not differ in other observed factors other than the extent of orbital infiltration. In 11 (61.1%) patients, vision was without significant change after radiation therapy. In 2 (11.1%) patients, visual function was impaired due to diplopia. 5 (27.8%) patients had severely impaired vision due to optic nerve atrophy after radiation therapy.

Conclusions: Our results show a relatively high survival rate in the group of patients with orbital preservation with a high chance of vision preservation, which justifies our approach to orbital preservation even in some tumors with periorbital infiltration.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼻窦鼻腔恶性肿瘤的肿瘤通过周围浸润时保留眼眶。
目的:鼻窦恶性肿瘤的可能风险之一是可能向眼眶扩散。然而,对于眶周脂肪的局限性肿瘤浸润是否有必要进行眶外扩张,不同科室之间尚未达成明确共识。本研究的目的是证明,眶周浸润和眶周脂肪侵犯而未累及眶深部组织并不是眼眶外扩的指征:对17年间接受鼻窦鼻腔恶性肿瘤手术治疗的患者进行回顾性分析,这些患者经组织学证实存在眶周浸润或向眼眶深部的侵犯。研究共纳入 32 名患者。对每组患者的以下数据进行了分析:性别、年龄、术前影像学检查、组织学检查结果、原发部位、分期、手术重建、肿瘤治疗、存活率、死亡原因、眼眶内复发次数和保留眼的功能状态:根据我们的眼眶外扩标准,18 例患者可以保留眼眶。14例肿瘤浸润较深的患者进行了眼眶外扩手术。两组患者的生存率差异无统计学意义。保留眼眶组的5年总生存率(OS)为44%(只有2名患者死于局部肿瘤复发),眼眶外翻组为34%。除眼眶浸润程度外,两组在其他观察因素上没有差异。11例(61.1%)患者在放疗后视力无明显变化。2例(11.1%)患者因复视导致视功能受损。5例(27.8%)患者在放疗后因视神经萎缩导致视力严重受损:我们的研究结果表明,保留眼眶的患者生存率相对较高,视力保留的几率也较高,这证明我们的保留眼眶方法是正确的,即使对一些有眶周浸润的肿瘤也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Long-term voice outcomes of medialization thyroplasty with adjustable implant for unilateral vocal fold paralysis. Correction: Management of Petrous Bone Cholesteatoma: The Gruppo Otologico Experience. Success and safety of endoscopic versus microscopic resection of temporal bone paraganglioma: a meta-analysis. Rhinitis medicomentosa and substance addiction. Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula: a new conservative approach for neonatal nasal stenosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1