Does Hyperventilation Increase the Diagnostic Yield of the Routine Electroencephalogram: A Retrospective Analysis of Adult and Pediatric Cohorts.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1097/WNP.0000000000001066
Neerrajah Nadarajah, Michael Fahey, Udaya Seneviratne
{"title":"Does Hyperventilation Increase the Diagnostic Yield of the Routine Electroencephalogram: A Retrospective Analysis of Adult and Pediatric Cohorts.","authors":"Neerrajah Nadarajah, Michael Fahey, Udaya Seneviratne","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While hyperventilation (HV) increases the diagnostic yield of EEG in children, there is conflicting evidence to support its application in adults. For the first time in history, a large cohort of patients has undergone EEGs without HV during the COVID-19 pandemic. Utilizing this opportunity, we sought to investigate whether HV increases the diagnostic yield of EEG in children compared with adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged six years and above who had routine EEGs at Monash Health between January 2019 and December 2020 were studied. The cohort was divided into two, pediatric (younger than 18 years) and adult (18 years or older). Epileptiform abnormalities (ictal and interictal) were the outcomes investigated. The effect of HV was examined with logistic regression to determine odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, we studied 3,273 patients (pediatric = 830, adult = 2,443). In the pediatric cohort, HV significantly increased the diagnostic yield of absence seizures (p = 0.01, odds ratios 2.44, 95% confidence intervals 1.21-4.93). In adults, HV did not increase the yield of absence seizures (p = 0.34, odds ratios 0.36, 95% confidence intervals 0.05-2.88). Interictal epileptiform discharges during HV were significantly more frequent in children compared with adults (p < 0.001, odds ratios 3.81, 95% confidence intervals 2.51-5.77).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hyperventilation is useful to increase the yield of interictal epileptiform discharges and absence seizures in pediatric patients but not in adults. Hence, routine EEG may be recorded in adults without HV when it is unsafe to perform.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: While hyperventilation (HV) increases the diagnostic yield of EEG in children, there is conflicting evidence to support its application in adults. For the first time in history, a large cohort of patients has undergone EEGs without HV during the COVID-19 pandemic. Utilizing this opportunity, we sought to investigate whether HV increases the diagnostic yield of EEG in children compared with adults.

Methods: Patients aged six years and above who had routine EEGs at Monash Health between January 2019 and December 2020 were studied. The cohort was divided into two, pediatric (younger than 18 years) and adult (18 years or older). Epileptiform abnormalities (ictal and interictal) were the outcomes investigated. The effect of HV was examined with logistic regression to determine odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: In total, we studied 3,273 patients (pediatric = 830, adult = 2,443). In the pediatric cohort, HV significantly increased the diagnostic yield of absence seizures (p = 0.01, odds ratios 2.44, 95% confidence intervals 1.21-4.93). In adults, HV did not increase the yield of absence seizures (p = 0.34, odds ratios 0.36, 95% confidence intervals 0.05-2.88). Interictal epileptiform discharges during HV were significantly more frequent in children compared with adults (p < 0.001, odds ratios 3.81, 95% confidence intervals 2.51-5.77).

Conclusions: Hyperventilation is useful to increase the yield of interictal epileptiform discharges and absence seizures in pediatric patients but not in adults. Hence, routine EEG may be recorded in adults without HV when it is unsafe to perform.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
过度通气是否会提高常规脑电图的诊断率?成人和儿童群体的回顾性分析》。
目的:虽然过度通气(HV)可提高儿童脑电图的诊断率,但在成人中应用该方法的证据却相互矛盾。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,历史上首次有大批患者在不使用 HV 的情况下接受脑电图检查。利用这一机会,我们试图研究与成人相比,HV 是否能提高儿童脑电图的诊断率:研究对象为 2019 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间在莫纳什卫生院进行常规脑电图检查的六岁及以上患者。研究对象分为两组,即儿童(18 岁以下)和成人(18 岁或以上)。痫样异常(发作期和发作间期)是研究的结果。我们采用逻辑回归法对HV的影响进行了研究,以确定带有95%置信区间的几率比:我们总共研究了 3273 名患者(儿童 = 830 人,成人 = 2443 人)。在儿童组群中,HV 能显著提高失神发作的诊断率(p = 0.01,几率比 2.44,95% 置信区间 1.21-4.93)。在成人中,HV 并未提高失神发作的诊断率(p = 0.34,几率比 0.36,95% 置信区间 0.05-2.88)。与成人相比,儿童在高压通气时发作间期癫痫样放电的频率明显更高(p < 0.001,几率比 3.81,95% 置信区间 2.51-5.77):结论:过度通气有助于提高儿童患者发作间期癫痫样放电和失神发作的检出率,但对成人则无效。因此,在不安全的情况下,可在成人中记录常规脑电图,而无需进行过度换气。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
198
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology features both topical reviews and original research in both central and peripheral neurophysiology, as related to patient evaluation and treatment. Official Journal of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic Value of Bereitschaftspotential in People With Functional Seizures. Chronobiological Spatial Clusters of Cortical Regions in the Human Brain. Classifying High-Frequency Oscillations by Morphologic Contrast to Background, With Surgical Outcome Correlates. Is Intraoperative Muscle Motor Evoked Potential Variability due to Fluctuating Lower Motor Neuron Background Excitability? Book Review for Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1