Views on advance care planning of family members of older adults with Turkish and Moroccan backgrounds: An exploratory interview study.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Palliative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1177/02692163241261207
Hakki Demirkapu, Wael Edally, Aline De Vleminck, Lieve Van den Block, Stéphanie De Maesschalck, Dirk Devroey
{"title":"Views on advance care planning of family members of older adults with Turkish and Moroccan backgrounds: An exploratory interview study.","authors":"Hakki Demirkapu, Wael Edally, Aline De Vleminck, Lieve Van den Block, Stéphanie De Maesschalck, Dirk Devroey","doi":"10.1177/02692163241261207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Significantly fewer individuals with migration backgrounds than native-born individuals undertake advance care planning. Older adults with Turkish and Moroccan backgrounds represent one of the largest ageing non-Western minority groups in Europe. Their relatives could play important roles in facilitating or hindering advance care planning, but their views remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore advance care planning knowledge, experience, views, facilitators and barriers among older Turkish and Moroccan adults' relatives in Belgium.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative thematic analysis of semi-structured interview data.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>Twenty-two relatives of older Turkish and Moroccan adults in Brussels, Mechelen and Antwerp, recruited via general practitioners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants had limited advance care planning knowledge and had not discussed it with healthcare professionals. Some found discussing end-of-life preferences with relatives beneficial; others opposed the discussion of specific topics or felt discussions were unnecessary, as they felt responsible for caregiving and trusted by their relatives to make future decisions. Barriers included personal and relational characteristics, emotional difficulty and perceived non-urgency. Facilitators included information in older adults' native languages, general practitioners' cautious initiation and the involvement of several family members.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Relatives of older people with Turkish and Moroccan backgrounds are unfamiliar with advance care planning and have highly variable views on it. People should be given opportunities to discuss advance care planning in a culturally appropriate manner, and the diversity of perspectives regarding whether and how to engage in such planning should be recognised.ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT05241301.</p>","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241261207","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Significantly fewer individuals with migration backgrounds than native-born individuals undertake advance care planning. Older adults with Turkish and Moroccan backgrounds represent one of the largest ageing non-Western minority groups in Europe. Their relatives could play important roles in facilitating or hindering advance care planning, but their views remain underexplored.

Aim: To explore advance care planning knowledge, experience, views, facilitators and barriers among older Turkish and Moroccan adults' relatives in Belgium.

Design: Qualitative thematic analysis of semi-structured interview data.

Setting/participants: Twenty-two relatives of older Turkish and Moroccan adults in Brussels, Mechelen and Antwerp, recruited via general practitioners.

Results: Participants had limited advance care planning knowledge and had not discussed it with healthcare professionals. Some found discussing end-of-life preferences with relatives beneficial; others opposed the discussion of specific topics or felt discussions were unnecessary, as they felt responsible for caregiving and trusted by their relatives to make future decisions. Barriers included personal and relational characteristics, emotional difficulty and perceived non-urgency. Facilitators included information in older adults' native languages, general practitioners' cautious initiation and the involvement of several family members.

Conclusions: Relatives of older people with Turkish and Moroccan backgrounds are unfamiliar with advance care planning and have highly variable views on it. People should be given opportunities to discuss advance care planning in a culturally appropriate manner, and the diversity of perspectives regarding whether and how to engage in such planning should be recognised.ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT05241301.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有土耳其和摩洛哥背景的老年人的家庭成员对预先护理规划的看法:一项探索性访谈研究。
背景:与本地出生的人相比,有移民背景的人进行预先护理规划的人数要少得多。具有土耳其和摩洛哥背景的老年人是欧洲最大的非西方少数民族老龄群体之一。他们的亲属可以在促进或阻碍预先护理规划方面发挥重要作用,但他们的观点仍未得到充分探讨。目的:探讨比利时土耳其和摩洛哥老年人亲属对预先护理规划的了解、经验、观点、促进因素和障碍:设计:对半结构式访谈数据进行定性专题分析:布鲁塞尔、梅赫伦和安特卫普的 22 名土耳其和摩洛哥老年人的亲属,通过全科医生招募:结果:参与者对临终关怀规划的了解有限,也没有与医护人员讨论过。有些人认为与亲属讨论临终偏好是有益的;另一些人则反对讨论特定话题或认为讨论没有必要,因为他们觉得自己有责任照顾他人,而且亲属信任他们可以做出未来的决定。障碍包括个人和关系特点、情感困难以及认为不紧急。促进因素包括以老年人的母语提供信息、全科医生的谨慎启动以及多名家庭成员的参与:结论:具有土耳其和摩洛哥背景的老年人的亲属对预先护理规划并不熟悉,对它的看法也大相径庭。应以文化适宜的方式为人们提供讨论预先护理规划的机会,并应认识到在是否参与及如何参与此类规划方面的观点多样性。NCT05241301。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine
Palliative Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Utilizing intricate care networks: An ethnography of patients and families navigating palliative care in a resource-limited setting. Definition and recommendations of advance care planning: A Delphi study in five Asian sectors. Pharmacological treatment of pain, dyspnea, death rattle, fever, nausea, and vomiting in the last days of life in older people: A systematic review. A pragmatic approach to selecting a grading system for clinical practice recommendations in palliative care. 'A good ending but not the end': Exploring family preparations surrounding a relative's death and the Afterlife - A qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1