Automated quantification of wrist bone marrow oedema, pre- and post-treatment, in early rheumatoid arthritis.

IF 2.1 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY Rheumatology Advances in Practice Pub Date : 2024-06-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/rap/rkae073
Chungwun Yiu, James Francis Griffith, Fan Xiao, Lin Shi, Bingjing Zhou, Su Wu, Lai-Shan Tam
{"title":"Automated quantification of wrist bone marrow oedema, pre- and post-treatment, in early rheumatoid arthritis.","authors":"Chungwun Yiu, James Francis Griffith, Fan Xiao, Lin Shi, Bingjing Zhou, Su Wu, Lai-Shan Tam","doi":"10.1093/rap/rkae073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Bone inflammation (osteitis) in early RA (ERA) manifests as bone marrow oedema (BME) and precedes the development of bone erosion. In this prospective, single-centre study, we developed an automated post-processing pipeline for quantifying the severity of wrist BME on T2-weighted fat-suppressed MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 80 ERA patients [mean age 54 years (s.d. 12), 62 females] were enrolled at baseline and 49 (40 females) after 1 year of treatment. For automated bone segmentation, a framework based on a convolutional neural network (nnU-Net) was trained and validated (5-fold cross-validation) for 15 wrist bone areas at baseline in 60 ERA patients. For BME quantification, BME was identified by Gaussian mixture model clustering and thresholding. BME proportion (%) and relative BME intensity within each bone area were compared with visual semi-quantitative assessment of the RA MRI score (RAMRIS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For automated wrist bone area segmentation, overall bone Sørensen-Dice similarity coefficient was 0.91 (s.d. 0.02) compared with ground truth manual segmentation. High correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient <i>r</i> = 0.928, <i>P</i> < 0.001) between visual RAMRIS BME and automated BME proportion assessment was found. The automated BME proportion decreased after treatment, correlating highly (<i>r</i> = 0.852, <i>P</i> < 0.001) with reduction in the RAMRIS BME score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The automated model developed had an excellent segmentation performance and reliable quantification of both the proportion and relative intensity of wrist BME in ERA patients, providing a more objective and efficient alternative to RAMRIS BME scoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":21350,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","volume":"8 3","pages":"rkae073"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11194532/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkae073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Bone inflammation (osteitis) in early RA (ERA) manifests as bone marrow oedema (BME) and precedes the development of bone erosion. In this prospective, single-centre study, we developed an automated post-processing pipeline for quantifying the severity of wrist BME on T2-weighted fat-suppressed MRI.

Methods: A total of 80 ERA patients [mean age 54 years (s.d. 12), 62 females] were enrolled at baseline and 49 (40 females) after 1 year of treatment. For automated bone segmentation, a framework based on a convolutional neural network (nnU-Net) was trained and validated (5-fold cross-validation) for 15 wrist bone areas at baseline in 60 ERA patients. For BME quantification, BME was identified by Gaussian mixture model clustering and thresholding. BME proportion (%) and relative BME intensity within each bone area were compared with visual semi-quantitative assessment of the RA MRI score (RAMRIS).

Results: For automated wrist bone area segmentation, overall bone Sørensen-Dice similarity coefficient was 0.91 (s.d. 0.02) compared with ground truth manual segmentation. High correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.928, P < 0.001) between visual RAMRIS BME and automated BME proportion assessment was found. The automated BME proportion decreased after treatment, correlating highly (r = 0.852, P < 0.001) with reduction in the RAMRIS BME score.

Conclusion: The automated model developed had an excellent segmentation performance and reliable quantification of both the proportion and relative intensity of wrist BME in ERA patients, providing a more objective and efficient alternative to RAMRIS BME scoring.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自动量化早期类风湿关节炎治疗前后的腕部骨髓水肿。
目的:早期RA(ERA)的骨炎症(骨炎)表现为骨髓水肿(BME),并先于骨侵蚀的发生。在这项前瞻性单中心研究中,我们开发了一种自动后处理管道,用于量化 T2 加权脂肪抑制 MRI 上腕部 BME 的严重程度:共有 80 名ERA 患者(平均年龄 54 岁(标准差 12 岁),62 名女性)接受了基线治疗,49 名患者(40 名女性)接受了一年的治疗。在自动骨分割方面,对 60 名 ERA 患者基线时的 15 个腕骨区域进行了基于卷积神经网络(nnU-Net)的框架训练和验证(5 倍交叉验证)。为了量化 BME,采用高斯混合模型聚类和阈值法识别 BME。将每个骨骼区域内的BME比例(%)和相对BME强度与RA MRI评分(RAMRIS)的视觉半定量评估进行比较:结果:在自动腕骨区域分割中,与地面实况人工分割相比,整体骨Sørensen-Dice相似系数为0.91(s.d. 0.02)。相关性较高(皮尔逊相关系数 r = 0.928,P r = 0.852,P 结论:所开发的自动模型具有出色的分割性能,能可靠地量化ERA患者腕部BME的比例和相对强度,为RAMRIS BME评分提供了更客观、更高效的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rheumatology Advances in Practice
Rheumatology Advances in Practice Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
197
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pain management in people with inflammatory arthritis: British Society for Rheumatology guideline scope. CONTExT-RA: a cross-sectional study evaluating disease activity, quality of life and the socio-demographic profile of Irish patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Recording of non-musculoskeletal manifestations, comorbidities and safety outcomes in European spondyloarthritis registries: a survey. Intramuscular methylprednisolone in hand osteoarthritis: a retrospective cohort study. Scleroderma renal crisis, an increasingly rare but persistently challenging condition: a retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1