Translation and validation of the Persian version of "The Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale" in patients with neurological disorders.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Assistive Technology Pub Date : 2025-02-14 Epub Date: 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1080/10400435.2024.2363383
Seyedeh Sareh Saeed, Mahnaz Hejazi-Shirmard, Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban, Jefferey Jutai, Mehdi Rezaee
{"title":"Translation and validation of the Persian version of \"The Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale\" in patients with neurological disorders.","authors":"Seyedeh Sareh Saeed, Mahnaz Hejazi-Shirmard, Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban, Jefferey Jutai, Mehdi Rezaee","doi":"10.1080/10400435.2024.2363383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neurological disorders are a heterogeneous group of central or peripheral nervous disorders of which the main symptoms include impaired walking and balance. One of the main interventions for neurological disorders is the use of assistive devices, and it is necessary to consider the psychosocial effects of these devices on users. The psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) were evaluated in patients with neurological disorders. After translating the scale into Persian based on IQULA, face and content validity were determined. The divergent validity of the scale was examined through its relationship with the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS). Reliability of the tool was evaluated using an internal consistency and test-retest method over two weeks with 50 patients with neurological disorders and a history of using assistive devices for at least six months. The face and content validity of the PIADS was confirmed. The ICC for all subscales was higher than 0.78, which indicates a good correlation. However, the divergent validity of the scale with the OPUS scale was not confirmed. The Persian version of PIADS is a valid and reliable measure for patients with neurological disorders in Iran.</p>","PeriodicalId":51568,"journal":{"name":"Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"S125-S130"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2024.2363383","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neurological disorders are a heterogeneous group of central or peripheral nervous disorders of which the main symptoms include impaired walking and balance. One of the main interventions for neurological disorders is the use of assistive devices, and it is necessary to consider the psychosocial effects of these devices on users. The psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) were evaluated in patients with neurological disorders. After translating the scale into Persian based on IQULA, face and content validity were determined. The divergent validity of the scale was examined through its relationship with the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS). Reliability of the tool was evaluated using an internal consistency and test-retest method over two weeks with 50 patients with neurological disorders and a history of using assistive devices for at least six months. The face and content validity of the PIADS was confirmed. The ICC for all subscales was higher than 0.78, which indicates a good correlation. However, the divergent validity of the scale with the OPUS scale was not confirmed. The Persian version of PIADS is a valid and reliable measure for patients with neurological disorders in Iran.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
翻译并验证波斯语版 "辅助设备对社会心理影响量表 "对神经系统疾病患者的影响。
神经系统疾病是中枢神经或周围神经失调的一个异质性群体,其主要症状包括行走和平衡能力受损。使用辅助设备是治疗神经系统疾病的主要干预措施之一,因此有必要考虑这些设备对使用者的社会心理影响。我们对波斯语版辅助设备心理社会影响量表(PIADS)的心理测量特性进行了评估。根据 IQULA 将量表翻译成波斯语后,确定了面效度和内容效度。通过量表与矫形器和假肢使用者调查(OPUS)的关系检验了量表的发散效度。使用内部一致性和重测法对该工具的可靠性进行了评估,对 50 名患有神经系统疾病且使用辅助设备至少六个月的患者进行了为期两周的重测。PIADS 的面效度和内容效度均得到了证实。所有分量表的 ICC 均高于 0.78,表明相关性良好。不过,该量表与 OPUS 量表的发散效度未得到证实。对于伊朗的神经系统疾病患者来说,波斯语版 PIADS 是一种有效且可靠的测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Assistive Technology
Assistive Technology REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Assistive Technology is an applied, scientific publication in the multi-disciplinary field of technology for people with disabilities. The journal"s purpose is to foster communication among individuals working in all aspects of the assistive technology arena including researchers, developers, clinicians, educators and consumers. The journal will consider papers from all assistive technology applications. Only original papers will be accepted. Technical notes describing preliminary techniques, procedures, or findings of original scientific research may also be submitted. Letters to the Editor are welcome. Books for review may be sent to authors or publisher.
期刊最新文献
RESNA position on the application of ultralight manual wheelchairs. Wheeled repair alliance: Rolling out wheelchair repair and maintenance in community bicycle shops. Quantifying toddler exploration in different postures with powered mobility. Program evaluation and healthcare process improvement focused on complex wheelchair procurement. On-time power mobility and physical activity in toddlers with motor delays: A randomized controlled trial using body-worn sensors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1