Evaluating prevalence and consequence of residual disease in individuals with psoriasis receiving apremilast treatment: results from a US patient survey.
Tina Bhutani, Sayeli Jayade, Sanika Rege, Hannah Penton, Vardhaman Patel, Samaneh Kalirai, Daniel Wolin, Kimberly Boyle, Lauren Seigel
{"title":"Evaluating prevalence and consequence of residual disease in individuals with psoriasis receiving apremilast treatment: results from a US patient survey.","authors":"Tina Bhutani, Sayeli Jayade, Sanika Rege, Hannah Penton, Vardhaman Patel, Samaneh Kalirai, Daniel Wolin, Kimberly Boyle, Lauren Seigel","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2024.2366532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> This noninterventional, cross-sectional survey estimated the prevalence and consequences of residual disease in apremilast-treated US adults with moderate to severe psoriasis. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Residual disease was defined as experiencing moderate, severe, or very severe psoriasis over the past week or having ≥3% body surface area affected, despite treatment. Factors associated with residual disease and its effects on flare-ups, humanistic burden, and health care resource utilization (HCRU) were evaluated. <b>Results:</b> Of the 344 apremilast users (mean age, 44.9 years; female, 65.4%), 174 (50.6%) had residual disease. It was more prevalent in Black versus White participants (OR, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.6-12.2), those receiving apremilast for ≥1 versus <1 year (OR, 16.5; 95% CI, 7.9-34.4), those reporting ≥2 versus 0 to 1 flare-ups during the past 3 months (OR, 10.0; 95% CI, 5.0-20.1), and those with ≥4 versus 1 to 3 body regions affected at time of survey (OR, 8.6; 95% CI, 3.8-19.8). Participants with versus without residual disease self-reported more psoriasis flare-ups over the past 3 months (mean, 4.7 vs 0.9; <i>p</i> < .001) and more anxiety (89.7% vs 50.0%; <i>p</i> < .001) and depression (69.0% vs 23.6%; <i>p</i> < .001) over the past 30 days. <b>Conclusion:</b> Generally, participants with versus without residual disease also had significantly more comorbidities and greater HCRU.</p>","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"35 1","pages":"2366532"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2024.2366532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This noninterventional, cross-sectional survey estimated the prevalence and consequences of residual disease in apremilast-treated US adults with moderate to severe psoriasis. Materials and Methods: Residual disease was defined as experiencing moderate, severe, or very severe psoriasis over the past week or having ≥3% body surface area affected, despite treatment. Factors associated with residual disease and its effects on flare-ups, humanistic burden, and health care resource utilization (HCRU) were evaluated. Results: Of the 344 apremilast users (mean age, 44.9 years; female, 65.4%), 174 (50.6%) had residual disease. It was more prevalent in Black versus White participants (OR, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.6-12.2), those receiving apremilast for ≥1 versus <1 year (OR, 16.5; 95% CI, 7.9-34.4), those reporting ≥2 versus 0 to 1 flare-ups during the past 3 months (OR, 10.0; 95% CI, 5.0-20.1), and those with ≥4 versus 1 to 3 body regions affected at time of survey (OR, 8.6; 95% CI, 3.8-19.8). Participants with versus without residual disease self-reported more psoriasis flare-ups over the past 3 months (mean, 4.7 vs 0.9; p < .001) and more anxiety (89.7% vs 50.0%; p < .001) and depression (69.0% vs 23.6%; p < .001) over the past 30 days. Conclusion: Generally, participants with versus without residual disease also had significantly more comorbidities and greater HCRU.
目的:这是一项非干预性横断面调查,目的是评估经阿普瑞司特治疗的美国中重度银屑病成人中残留疾病的患病率和后果。材料与方法:残留疾病的定义是:尽管接受了治疗,但在过去一周内出现中度、重度或极重度银屑病,或受影响的体表面积≥3%。评估与残留疾病相关的因素及其对复发、人文负担和医疗资源利用率(HCRU)的影响。研究结果在 344 名阿普瑞司特使用者(平均年龄 44.9 岁;女性 65.4%)中,174 人(50.6%)有残留疾病。黑人与白人相比(OR,4.5;95% CI,1.6-12.2),接受阿普瑞司特治疗≥1 次与 p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p 结 论:一般来说,有残留疾病与无残留疾病的参与者之间存在着明显的差异:一般来说,有残留疾病的参与者与无残留疾病的参与者相比,合并症明显更多,HCRU 也更高。