JENNIFER E. LAYNE, LAUREN H. JEPSON, ALEXANDER CARITE, RICHARD M. BERGENSTAL
{"title":"983-P: Long-Term Improvement in CGM-Measured Glycemic Control in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Not Treated with Insulin—Real-World Data","authors":"JENNIFER E. LAYNE, LAUREN H. JEPSON, ALEXANDER CARITE, RICHARD M. BERGENSTAL","doi":"10.2337/db24-983-p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Emerging evidence indicates that CGM use is associated with improvements in glycemic control in adults with noninsulin treated T2D. This real-world study evaluated CGM metrics for one year after CGM initiation in this population. Methods: Data were analyzed from Dexcom G6 and G7 users who self-reported: T2D, ≥18 yr, gender, no insulin use and had baseline TIR ≤70%. Outcomes were change in CGM metrics from baseline to 6 months and 1 year, and proportion with TIR >70% at follow-up overall and for younger (<65 yr) and older (≥65 yr) cohorts. Results: CGM users (n=3,840) were: mean (SD): 52.5 (11.2) yr, 48% female, TIR 70-180 mg/dL 41.7% (21.4) and 12.4% of participants were ≥65 yr. Significant improvement was observed at 6 months with continued improvement at 1 year (Table) for all CGM metrics not at target values at baseline. The proportion of CGM users meeting TIR >70% increased from 0% to 37.9% at 6 months and to 43.1% at 1 year. CGM was worn 84.7% of days. Outcomes were very similar for younger and older adults. One exception of note was the change in the TITR 70-140 mg/dL at 1 year, <65 yr: +17.1% and ≥65 yr: +12.7%, but the <65 yr group started with a lower baseline TITR. Conclusion: In this large, real-world study of adults with suboptimally controlled T2D not using insulin, CGM use was associated with meaningful improvements in glycemic control at 6 months with ongoing improvement at 1 year. Disclosure J.E. Layne: Employee; Dexcom, Inc. Stock/Shareholder; Dexcom, Inc. Employee; Verily Life Sciences. L.H. Jepson: Employee; Dexcom, Inc. Stock/Shareholder; Dexcom, Inc. A. Carite: Employee; Dexcom, Inc. Stock/Shareholder; Dexcom, Inc. R.M. Bergenstal: Other Relationship; Abbott. Research Support; Arkray Marketing. Consultant; Ascensia Diabetes Care, Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc., CeQur. Other Relationship; Dexcom, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company. Consultant; embecta, Hygieia. Research Support; Insulet Corporation. Consultant; MannKind Corporation. Other Relationship; Medtronic, Novo Nordisk. Consultant; Onduo LLC, Roche Diabetes Care. Other Relationship; Sanofi. Research Support; Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. Other Relationship; UnitedHealth Group. Consultant; Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Zealand Pharma A/S.","PeriodicalId":11376,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/db24-983-p","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Emerging evidence indicates that CGM use is associated with improvements in glycemic control in adults with noninsulin treated T2D. This real-world study evaluated CGM metrics for one year after CGM initiation in this population. Methods: Data were analyzed from Dexcom G6 and G7 users who self-reported: T2D, ≥18 yr, gender, no insulin use and had baseline TIR ≤70%. Outcomes were change in CGM metrics from baseline to 6 months and 1 year, and proportion with TIR >70% at follow-up overall and for younger (<65 yr) and older (≥65 yr) cohorts. Results: CGM users (n=3,840) were: mean (SD): 52.5 (11.2) yr, 48% female, TIR 70-180 mg/dL 41.7% (21.4) and 12.4% of participants were ≥65 yr. Significant improvement was observed at 6 months with continued improvement at 1 year (Table) for all CGM metrics not at target values at baseline. The proportion of CGM users meeting TIR >70% increased from 0% to 37.9% at 6 months and to 43.1% at 1 year. CGM was worn 84.7% of days. Outcomes were very similar for younger and older adults. One exception of note was the change in the TITR 70-140 mg/dL at 1 year, <65 yr: +17.1% and ≥65 yr: +12.7%, but the <65 yr group started with a lower baseline TITR. Conclusion: In this large, real-world study of adults with suboptimally controlled T2D not using insulin, CGM use was associated with meaningful improvements in glycemic control at 6 months with ongoing improvement at 1 year. Disclosure J.E. Layne: Employee; Dexcom, Inc. Stock/Shareholder; Dexcom, Inc. Employee; Verily Life Sciences. L.H. Jepson: Employee; Dexcom, Inc. Stock/Shareholder; Dexcom, Inc. A. Carite: Employee; Dexcom, Inc. Stock/Shareholder; Dexcom, Inc. R.M. Bergenstal: Other Relationship; Abbott. Research Support; Arkray Marketing. Consultant; Ascensia Diabetes Care, Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc., CeQur. Other Relationship; Dexcom, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company. Consultant; embecta, Hygieia. Research Support; Insulet Corporation. Consultant; MannKind Corporation. Other Relationship; Medtronic, Novo Nordisk. Consultant; Onduo LLC, Roche Diabetes Care. Other Relationship; Sanofi. Research Support; Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. Other Relationship; UnitedHealth Group. Consultant; Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Zealand Pharma A/S.
期刊介绍:
Diabetes is a scientific journal that publishes original research exploring the physiological and pathophysiological aspects of diabetes mellitus. We encourage submissions of manuscripts pertaining to laboratory, animal, or human research, covering a wide range of topics. Our primary focus is on investigative reports investigating various aspects such as the development and progression of diabetes, along with its associated complications. We also welcome studies delving into normal and pathological pancreatic islet function and intermediary metabolism, as well as exploring the mechanisms of drug and hormone action from a pharmacological perspective. Additionally, we encourage submissions that delve into the biochemical and molecular aspects of both normal and abnormal biological processes.
However, it is important to note that we do not publish studies relating to diabetes education or the application of accepted therapeutic and diagnostic approaches to patients with diabetes mellitus. Our aim is to provide a platform for research that contributes to advancing our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and processes of diabetes.