Effects of sugarcane cultivation on aquatic macroinvertebrate community structure: a historical comparative case study in São Paulo State.

IF 1.1 4区 综合性期刊 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias Pub Date : 2024-06-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0001-3765202420230502
Bruna Naiara S Cardoso, Maria Helena V Carrascossi, Guilherme R Gorni, Vanessa Colombo-Corbi, Daniel P Abrahão, Juliano José Corbi
{"title":"Effects of sugarcane cultivation on aquatic macroinvertebrate community structure: a historical comparative case study in São Paulo State.","authors":"Bruna Naiara S Cardoso, Maria Helena V Carrascossi, Guilherme R Gorni, Vanessa Colombo-Corbi, Daniel P Abrahão, Juliano José Corbi","doi":"10.1590/0001-3765202420230502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over two decades, the area with sugarcane has more than doubled, from 4.8 million hectares in 2000 to 10 million in 2018, in Brazil. São Paulo State is mostly responsible for the sugarcane production in the country, accounting for 51% of the national production. In 2008, a study was conducted analysing the relationship between sugarcane cultivation and the aquatic macroinvertebrate community, showing the impacts of sugarcane on the macroinvertebrate aquatic fauna. The present study aims to gather actual information on the aquatic macroinvertebrate community in the same streams studied in 2008, to make a historical comparison with studies previously carried out. Eight streams were selected; four located in areas of sugarcane cultivation and four located in preserved areas. Three samples were carried out between 2018 and 2020. The aquatic macroinvertebrates were collected using a D-frame aquatic net (250 μm) including riffle and pools areas and identified using specific identification keys. The results of the historical assessment showed better ecological conditions of the streams in 2008 when compared to 2018 in areas of sugarcane cultivation, suggesting that the environmental impact was maintained and increased after ten years.</p>","PeriodicalId":7776,"journal":{"name":"Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202420230502","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over two decades, the area with sugarcane has more than doubled, from 4.8 million hectares in 2000 to 10 million in 2018, in Brazil. São Paulo State is mostly responsible for the sugarcane production in the country, accounting for 51% of the national production. In 2008, a study was conducted analysing the relationship between sugarcane cultivation and the aquatic macroinvertebrate community, showing the impacts of sugarcane on the macroinvertebrate aquatic fauna. The present study aims to gather actual information on the aquatic macroinvertebrate community in the same streams studied in 2008, to make a historical comparison with studies previously carried out. Eight streams were selected; four located in areas of sugarcane cultivation and four located in preserved areas. Three samples were carried out between 2018 and 2020. The aquatic macroinvertebrates were collected using a D-frame aquatic net (250 μm) including riffle and pools areas and identified using specific identification keys. The results of the historical assessment showed better ecological conditions of the streams in 2008 when compared to 2018 in areas of sugarcane cultivation, suggesting that the environmental impact was maintained and increased after ten years.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甘蔗种植对水生大型无脊椎动物群落结构的影响:圣保罗州的历史比较案例研究。
二十年来,巴西的甘蔗种植面积翻了一番多,从 2000 年的 480 万公顷增至 2018 年的 1 000 万公顷。圣保罗州主要负责全国的甘蔗生产,占全国产量的 51%。2008 年,一项研究分析了甘蔗种植与水生大型无脊椎动物群落之间的关系,显示了甘蔗对大型无脊椎动物水生动物群落的影响。本研究旨在收集 2008 年研究过的相同溪流中水生大型无脊椎动物群落的实际信息,以便与之前进行的研究进行历史比较。研究选取了八条溪流,其中四条位于甘蔗种植区,四条位于保护区。在 2018 年至 2020 年期间进行了三次取样。使用 D 型水生网(250 μm)收集水生大型无脊椎动物,包括河沟和水池区域,并使用特定的识别钥匙进行鉴定。历史评估结果表明,与 2018 年相比,2008 年甘蔗种植区的溪流生态条件更好,这表明十年后环境影响得以维持并有所增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
347
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Academy of Sciences (BAS) publishes its journal, Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences (AABC, in its Brazilianportuguese acronym ), every 3 months, being the oldest journal in Brazil with conkinuous distribukion, daking back to 1929. This scienkihic journal aims to publish the advances in scienkihic research from both Brazilian and foreigner scienkists, who work in the main research centers in the whole world, always looking for excellence. Essenkially a mulkidisciplinary journal, the AABC cover, with both reviews and original researches, the diverse areas represented in the Academy, such as Biology, Physics, Biomedical Sciences, Chemistry, Agrarian Sciences, Engineering, Mathemakics, Social, Health and Earth Sciences.
期刊最新文献
Anthropogenic effect on the pedochemical variability of potentially toxic elements at the vicinity of an Antarctic research station. Biocontrol mechanisms of the Antarctic yeast Debaryomyces hansenii UFT8244 against post-harvest phytopathogenic fungi of strawberries. Waterborne metal levels in four freshwater lakes from Harmony Point, Nelson Island, Antarctica. Errata. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the severity of newly diagnosed cases of head and neck cancer in southern Brazil.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1