Correlation between the maximum standard uptake value and mean Hounsfield unit on single-photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography to discriminate benign and metastatic lesions among patients with breast cancer.

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Asian Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-25 DOI:10.31616/asj.2022.0451
S Thadchaiani Saminathan, Wan Aireene Wan Ahmed, Norazlina Mat Nawi, Nashrulhaq Tagiling, Ilyana Aziz, Yusri Udin, Mohd Fazrin Mohd Rohani, Wan Mohd Nazlee Wan Zainon, Mohammad Khairul Azhar Abdul Razab
{"title":"Correlation between the maximum standard uptake value and mean Hounsfield unit on single-photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography to discriminate benign and metastatic lesions among patients with breast cancer.","authors":"S Thadchaiani Saminathan, Wan Aireene Wan Ahmed, Norazlina Mat Nawi, Nashrulhaq Tagiling, Ilyana Aziz, Yusri Udin, Mohd Fazrin Mohd Rohani, Wan Mohd Nazlee Wan Zainon, Mohammad Khairul Azhar Abdul Razab","doi":"10.31616/asj.2022.0451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare and correlate technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate uptake between benign and metastatic bone lesions using semiquantitative analysis of maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) and mean Hounsfield unit (HU) in single-photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography (SPECT-CT).</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>Qualitative interpretation of metastatic bone lesions in breast cancer on bone scintigraphy is often complicated by coexisting benign lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 185 lesions were identified on bone and SPECT-CT scans from 32 patients. Lesions were classified as metastatic (109 sclerotic lesions) and benign (76 lesions) morphologically on low-dose CT. Semiquantitative analysis using SUVmax and mean HU was performed on the lesions and compared. To discriminate benign and metastatic lesions, the correlation between SUVmax and mean HU was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SUVmax was higher in metastatic lesions (20.66±14.36) but lower in benign lesions (10.18±12.79) (p<0.001). The mean HU was lower in metastatic lesions (166.62±202.02) but higher in benign lesions (517.65±192.8) (p<0.001). A weak negative correlation was found between the SUVmax and the mean HU for benign lesions, and a weak positive correlation was noted between the SUVmax and the mean HU on malignant lesions with no statistical significance (p=0.394 and 0.312, respectively). The cutoff values obtained were 10.8 for SUVmax (82.6% sensitivity and 84.2% specificity) and 240.86 for the mean HU (98.7% sensitivity and 88.1% specificity) in differentiating benign from malignant bone lesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Semiquantitative assessment using SUVmax and HU can complement qualitative analysis. Metastatic lesions had higher SUVmax but lower mean HU than benign lesions, whereas benign lesions demonstrated higher mean HU but lower SUVmax. A weak correlation was found between the SUVmax and the mean HU on malignant and benign lesions. Cutoff values of 10.8 for the SUVmax and 240.86 for the mean HU may differentiate bone metastases from benign lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"398-406"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11222895/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2022.0451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective study.

Purpose: To compare and correlate technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate uptake between benign and metastatic bone lesions using semiquantitative analysis of maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) and mean Hounsfield unit (HU) in single-photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography (SPECT-CT).

Overview of literature: Qualitative interpretation of metastatic bone lesions in breast cancer on bone scintigraphy is often complicated by coexisting benign lesions.

Methods: In total, 185 lesions were identified on bone and SPECT-CT scans from 32 patients. Lesions were classified as metastatic (109 sclerotic lesions) and benign (76 lesions) morphologically on low-dose CT. Semiquantitative analysis using SUVmax and mean HU was performed on the lesions and compared. To discriminate benign and metastatic lesions, the correlation between SUVmax and mean HU was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficients.

Results: The SUVmax was higher in metastatic lesions (20.66±14.36) but lower in benign lesions (10.18±12.79) (p<0.001). The mean HU was lower in metastatic lesions (166.62±202.02) but higher in benign lesions (517.65±192.8) (p<0.001). A weak negative correlation was found between the SUVmax and the mean HU for benign lesions, and a weak positive correlation was noted between the SUVmax and the mean HU on malignant lesions with no statistical significance (p=0.394 and 0.312, respectively). The cutoff values obtained were 10.8 for SUVmax (82.6% sensitivity and 84.2% specificity) and 240.86 for the mean HU (98.7% sensitivity and 88.1% specificity) in differentiating benign from malignant bone lesions.

Conclusions: Semiquantitative assessment using SUVmax and HU can complement qualitative analysis. Metastatic lesions had higher SUVmax but lower mean HU than benign lesions, whereas benign lesions demonstrated higher mean HU but lower SUVmax. A weak correlation was found between the SUVmax and the mean HU on malignant and benign lesions. Cutoff values of 10.8 for the SUVmax and 240.86 for the mean HU may differentiate bone metastases from benign lesions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单光子发射计算机断层扫描最大标准摄取值与平均 Hounsfield 单位之间的相关性,用于区分乳腺癌患者中的良性病变和转移性病变。
研究设计目的:通过对单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT-CT)中最大标准摄取值(SUVmax)和平均Hounsfield单位(HU)进行半定量分析,比较良性骨病变和转移性骨病变对锝-99m亚甲基二膦酸盐的摄取量,并将其相关联:文献综述:骨闪烁成像对乳腺癌转移性骨病变的定性解读往往因同时存在良性病变而变得复杂:方法:32 名患者的骨扫描和 SPECT-CT 扫描共发现 185 个病灶。方法:32 名患者的骨扫描和 SPECT-CT 扫描共发现 185 个病灶,根据低剂量 CT 的形态将病灶分为转移性病灶(109 个硬化性病灶)和良性病灶(76 个病灶)。使用 SUVmax 和平均 HU 对病变进行了半定量分析和比较。为了区分良性病变和转移性病变,使用类内相关系数确定了 SUVmax 和平均 HU 之间的相关性:结果:转移性病变的 SUVmax 较高(20.66±14.36),而良性病变的 SUVmax 较低(10.18±12.79)(p 结论:SUVmax 与平均 HU 之间存在相关性:使用SUVmax和HU进行半定量评估可补充定性分析。与良性病变相比,转移性病变的 SUVmax 较高,但平均 HU 较低,而良性病变的平均 HU 较高,但 SUVmax 较低。恶性和良性病变的 SUVmax 与平均 HU 之间的相关性较弱。SUVmax和平均HU的临界值分别为10.8和240.86,可以区分骨转移和良性病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Spine Journal
Asian Spine Journal ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
108
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Normative values of non-radiological surface measurement of the lumbar lordosis curvature in the standing position and its association with age, sex, and body mass index: a cross-sectional study of 2,500 healthy individuals from Iran. A magnetic resonance imaging-based morphometric analysis of bilateral L1-L5 oblique lumbar interbody fusion corridor: feasibility of safe surgical approach and influencing factors. A novel pedicle screw design to maximize screw-bone interface strength using finite element analysis and design of experiment techniques. Factors related to surgical site infection in spinal instrumentation surgery: a retrospective study in Japan. Perioperative complications in patients aged ≥85 years undergoing spinal surgery: a retrospective comparative study of pre-old and old patients in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1