Retrospective Analysis of Aberrant Hepatic Artery in 1250 Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Transarterial Chemoembolization.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annali italiani di chirurgia Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62713/aic.3366
Dongdong Du, Zhenhai Zhang, Xinxing Wang, Mingze Ma, Naishi Wu
{"title":"Retrospective Analysis of Aberrant Hepatic Artery in 1250 Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Transarterial Chemoembolization.","authors":"Dongdong Du, Zhenhai Zhang, Xinxing Wang, Mingze Ma, Naishi Wu","doi":"10.62713/aic.3366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Aberrant hepatic artery is particularly common, and its diversity and complexity play a critical role in surgery. The aim of this study was to describe the incidence and type of aberrant hepatic artery, and to compare differences in transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with vs without aberrant hepatic artery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of patients with HCC who received TACE at the same intervention center between March 15, 2020 and December 31, 2022. All patients who met inclusion criteria were divided into two groups based on whether or not they had aberrant hepatic artery. The aberrant hepatic artery was systematically classified according to variations in origin. We compared differences in baseline characteristics, operation duration, and postoperative hospitalization between the two groups. Postoperative adverse events and laboratory data were also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1250 patients hospitalized with HCC were included in the study (mean age, 58 ± 10 years, 1019 [81.5%] males). A high incidence of aberrant hepatic artery was found during TACE (21.3%, 266 of 1250), mainly involving a single variation of the aberrant left hepatic artery (aLHA) (6.1%, 76 of 1250) or aberrant right hepatic artery (aRHA) (10.9%, 136 of 1250) origin, as well as complex variations of the aLHA and aRHA origin (2.4%, 30 of 1250). When comparing patients with vs without aberrant hepatic artery, the TACE operation duration was significantly different (p < 0.001), and tended to be greater for patients with aberrant hepatic artery. In addition, differences between aberrant and normal hepatic artery groups in postoperative nausea and vomiting were statistically significant (40.2% vs 30.8%, respectively, p = 0.004). Postoperative laboratory examinations revealed significant differences in aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and neutrophil percentage between the two groups (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of aberrant hepatic artery is extremely high, and the condition is characterized by complex variations. Moreover, aberrant hepatic artery may have a critical impact on the course of TACE treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":8210,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","volume":"95 3","pages":"364-373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3366","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Aberrant hepatic artery is particularly common, and its diversity and complexity play a critical role in surgery. The aim of this study was to describe the incidence and type of aberrant hepatic artery, and to compare differences in transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with vs without aberrant hepatic artery.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients with HCC who received TACE at the same intervention center between March 15, 2020 and December 31, 2022. All patients who met inclusion criteria were divided into two groups based on whether or not they had aberrant hepatic artery. The aberrant hepatic artery was systematically classified according to variations in origin. We compared differences in baseline characteristics, operation duration, and postoperative hospitalization between the two groups. Postoperative adverse events and laboratory data were also compared.

Results: A total of 1250 patients hospitalized with HCC were included in the study (mean age, 58 ± 10 years, 1019 [81.5%] males). A high incidence of aberrant hepatic artery was found during TACE (21.3%, 266 of 1250), mainly involving a single variation of the aberrant left hepatic artery (aLHA) (6.1%, 76 of 1250) or aberrant right hepatic artery (aRHA) (10.9%, 136 of 1250) origin, as well as complex variations of the aLHA and aRHA origin (2.4%, 30 of 1250). When comparing patients with vs without aberrant hepatic artery, the TACE operation duration was significantly different (p < 0.001), and tended to be greater for patients with aberrant hepatic artery. In addition, differences between aberrant and normal hepatic artery groups in postoperative nausea and vomiting were statistically significant (40.2% vs 30.8%, respectively, p = 0.004). Postoperative laboratory examinations revealed significant differences in aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and neutrophil percentage between the two groups (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The incidence of aberrant hepatic artery is extremely high, and the condition is characterized by complex variations. Moreover, aberrant hepatic artery may have a critical impact on the course of TACE treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对1250名接受经动脉化疗栓塞术的肝细胞癌患者肝动脉异常的回顾性分析
目的:肝动脉异常尤其常见,其多样性和复杂性在手术中起着至关重要的作用。本研究旨在描述肝动脉异常的发生率和类型,并比较有肝动脉异常与无肝动脉异常的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)的差异:这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象是2020年3月15日至2022年12月31日期间在同一干预中心接受TACE治疗的HCC患者。所有符合纳入标准的患者根据是否存在肝动脉异常分为两组。根据起源的不同对异常肝动脉进行系统分类。我们比较了两组患者的基线特征、手术时间和术后住院时间的差异。我们还比较了术后不良事件和实验室数据:研究共纳入了 1250 名住院的 HCC 患者(平均年龄为 58 ± 10 岁,男性 1019 名 [81.5%])。TACE 期间发现肝动脉畸变的发生率很高(21.3%,1250 例中的 266 例),主要涉及肝左动脉畸变(aLHA)(6.1%,1250 例中的 76 例)或肝右动脉畸变(aRHA)(10.9%,1250 例中的 136 例)起源的单一变异,以及肝左动脉畸变和肝右动脉畸变起源的复杂变异(2.4%,1250 例中的 30 例)。比较有肝动脉畸变和无肝动脉畸变的患者,TACE 手术持续时间有显著差异(P < 0.001),且有肝动脉畸变的患者手术持续时间往往更长。此外,肝动脉异常组和肝动脉正常组在术后恶心和呕吐方面的差异也有统计学意义(分别为 40.2% 对 30.8%,P = 0.004)。术后实验室检查显示,两组患者的天冬氨酸氨基转移酶、丙氨酸氨基转移酶和中性粒细胞百分比差异显著(P < 0.05):肝动脉异常的发病率极高,且病情变化复杂。结论:肝动脉反常的发生率极高,且病情变化复杂,此外,肝动脉反常可能会对 TACE 治疗过程产生关键影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal and covers all aspects of surgery:elective, emergency and experimental surgery, as well as problems involving technology, teaching, organization and forensic medicine. The articles are published in Italian or English, though English is preferred because it facilitates the international diffusion of the journal (v.Guidelines for Authors and Norme per gli Autori). The articles published are divided into three main sections:editorials, original articles, and case reports and innovations.
期刊最新文献
Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of Esophagus with Lung Metastasis: Case Report. Adrenocortical Adenoma Arising from Adrenohepatic Fusion: A Mimic of Hepatocellular Carcinoma-Case Report. Application Evaluation of Fluorouracil Intraperitoneal Perfusion Chemotherapy in Combination with Intravenous Chemotherapy in Patients after Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer. Comparison of Hem-o-lok and Endoloop for Appendiceal Stump Closure in Laparoscopic Appendectomy: An Observational Retrospective Study. Comparison of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression and Full Endoscopic Lamina Fenestration Decompression in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Unilateral Radicular Pain: A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1