Effect of mode of delivery on incidence of retinopathy of prematurity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY BMJ Open Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001678
Vera Sumual, Reynardi Larope Sutanto, Angelina Patricia Chandra
{"title":"Effect of mode of delivery on incidence of retinopathy of prematurity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Vera Sumual, Reynardi Larope Sutanto, Angelina Patricia Chandra","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a leading cause of childhood blindness worldwide. Prompt diagnosis and treatment are crucial in ROP management. Thus, the identification of prominent risk factors could facilitate immediate action. Among various risk factors, the effects of mode of delivery on ROP remain unclear. Therefore, this study aims to assess the association between different modes of delivery on ROP incidence.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, ProQuest, EBSCOHost and Cochrane databases, to evaluate the association of mode of delivery-vaginal delivery or caesarean section (c-section)-and the incidence of ROP from inception to December 2023. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled OR along with their 95% CIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review included 5 cohort studies involving 2048 babies. A higher incidence of ROP was observed in infants born through vaginal delivery compared with caesarean section. Meta-analysis showed that C-section decreased the unadjusted odds of having ROP infants by 46% with low heterogeneity (OR 0.54 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.73); I<sup>2</sup>=40.73%). However, pooled adjusted effects were statistically insignificant with moderate heterogeneity (adjusted OR 0.59 (95% CI 0.28 to 1.23); I<sup>2</sup>=70.51%), possibly stemming from multiple variations in the controlled variables of each study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite varying statistical significance, our findings underscore the crucial need to comprehend the influence of delivery mode on neonatal ophthalmic outcomes. Due to a limited number of existing studies, further research is needed to confirm the association.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42023486278.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11202656/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a leading cause of childhood blindness worldwide. Prompt diagnosis and treatment are crucial in ROP management. Thus, the identification of prominent risk factors could facilitate immediate action. Among various risk factors, the effects of mode of delivery on ROP remain unclear. Therefore, this study aims to assess the association between different modes of delivery on ROP incidence.

Methods and analysis: Comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, ProQuest, EBSCOHost and Cochrane databases, to evaluate the association of mode of delivery-vaginal delivery or caesarean section (c-section)-and the incidence of ROP from inception to December 2023. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled OR along with their 95% CIs.

Results: This review included 5 cohort studies involving 2048 babies. A higher incidence of ROP was observed in infants born through vaginal delivery compared with caesarean section. Meta-analysis showed that C-section decreased the unadjusted odds of having ROP infants by 46% with low heterogeneity (OR 0.54 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.73); I2=40.73%). However, pooled adjusted effects were statistically insignificant with moderate heterogeneity (adjusted OR 0.59 (95% CI 0.28 to 1.23); I2=70.51%), possibly stemming from multiple variations in the controlled variables of each study.

Conclusion: Despite varying statistical significance, our findings underscore the crucial need to comprehend the influence of delivery mode on neonatal ophthalmic outcomes. Due to a limited number of existing studies, further research is needed to confirm the association.

Prospero registration number: CRD42023486278.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分娩方式对早产儿视网膜病变发病率的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:早产儿视网膜病变(ROP早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)是全球儿童失明的主要原因。及时诊断和治疗对早产儿视网膜病变的治疗至关重要。因此,识别突出的风险因素有助于立即采取行动。在各种风险因素中,分娩方式对早产儿视网膜病变的影响仍不明确。因此,本研究旨在评估不同分娩方式对早产儿视网膜病变发病率的影响:在PubMed、ProQuest、EBSCOHost和Cochrane数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,以评估分娩方式--阴道分娩或剖腹产(c-section)--与自开始至2023年12月的ROP发病率之间的关系。随机效应荟萃分析估算了汇总的OR及其95% CI:该综述包括 5 项队列研究,涉及 2048 名婴儿。与剖腹产相比,阴道分娩婴儿的视网膜病变发生率更高。Meta 分析表明,剖腹产降低了 46% 的视网膜病变婴儿的未调整几率,异质性较低(OR 0.54 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.73);I2=40.73%)。然而,汇总调整后的效果在统计学上并不显著,且存在中度异质性(调整后 OR 0.59 (95% CI 0.28 至 1.23);I2=70.51%),这可能是由于每项研究的控制变量存在多种差异:尽管统计意义不尽相同,但我们的研究结果强调了理解分娩方式对新生儿眼科预后影响的重要性。由于现有研究的数量有限,因此需要进一步研究来证实这种关联:CRD42023486278。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
BMJ Open Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
104
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigation of choroidal vascular alterations in eyes with myopia using ultrawidefield optical coherence tomography angiography. Recent advances in the application of artificial intelligence in age-related macular degeneration. Network-based hub biomarker discovery for glaucoma. Investigating the effects of simulated high altitude on colour discrimination. Total retinal thickness is an important factor in evaluating diabetic retinal neurodegeneration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1