Clinical Subphenotypes of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Clinical Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1093/cid/ciae338
Maaike C Swets, Zsuzsa Bakk, Annette C Westgeest, Karla Berry, George Cooper, Wynne Sim, Rui Shian Lee, Tze Yi Gan, William Donlon, Antonia Besu, Emily Heppenstall, Luke Tysall, Simon Dewar, Mark de Boer, Vance G Fowler, David H Dockrell, Guy E Thwaites, Miquel Pujol, Natàlia Pallarès, Cristian Tebé, Jordi Carratalà, Alexander Szubert, Geert H Groeneveld, Clark D Russell
{"title":"Clinical Subphenotypes of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.","authors":"Maaike C Swets, Zsuzsa Bakk, Annette C Westgeest, Karla Berry, George Cooper, Wynne Sim, Rui Shian Lee, Tze Yi Gan, William Donlon, Antonia Besu, Emily Heppenstall, Luke Tysall, Simon Dewar, Mark de Boer, Vance G Fowler, David H Dockrell, Guy E Thwaites, Miquel Pujol, Natàlia Pallarès, Cristian Tebé, Jordi Carratalà, Alexander Szubert, Geert H Groeneveld, Clark D Russell","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is a clinically heterogeneous disease. The ability to identify subgroups of patients with shared traits (subphenotypes) is an unmet need to allow patient stratification for clinical management and research. We aimed to test the hypothesis that clinically relevant subphenotypes can be reproducibly identified among patients with SAB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied 3 cohorts of adults with monomicrobial SAB: a UK retrospective observational study (Edinburgh cohort, n = 458), the UK ARREST trial (n = 758), and the Spanish SAFO trial (n = 214). Latent class analysis was used to identify subphenotypes using routinely collected clinical data without considering outcomes. Mortality and microbiologic outcomes were then compared between subphenotypes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Included patients had predominantly methicillin-susceptible SAB (1366 of 1430, 95.5%). We identified 5 distinct, reproducible clinical subphenotypes: (A) SAB associated with older age and comorbidity, (B) nosocomial intravenous catheter-associated SAB in younger people without comorbidity, (C) community-acquired metastatic SAB, (D) SAB associated with chronic kidney disease, and (E) SAB associated with injection drug use. Survival and microbiologic outcomes differed between the subphenotypes. Mortality was highest in subphenotype A and lowest in subphenotypes B and E. Microbiologic outcomes were worse in subphenotype C. In a secondary analysis of the ARREST trial, adjunctive rifampicin was associated with increased mortality in subphenotype B and improved microbiologic outcomes in subphenotype C.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have identified reproducible and clinically relevant subphenotypes within SAB and provide proof of principle of differential treatment effects. Through clinical trial enrichment and patient stratification, these subphenotypes could contribute to a personalized medicine approach to SAB.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1153-1161"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11581694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae338","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is a clinically heterogeneous disease. The ability to identify subgroups of patients with shared traits (subphenotypes) is an unmet need to allow patient stratification for clinical management and research. We aimed to test the hypothesis that clinically relevant subphenotypes can be reproducibly identified among patients with SAB.

Methods: We studied 3 cohorts of adults with monomicrobial SAB: a UK retrospective observational study (Edinburgh cohort, n = 458), the UK ARREST trial (n = 758), and the Spanish SAFO trial (n = 214). Latent class analysis was used to identify subphenotypes using routinely collected clinical data without considering outcomes. Mortality and microbiologic outcomes were then compared between subphenotypes.

Results: Included patients had predominantly methicillin-susceptible SAB (1366 of 1430, 95.5%). We identified 5 distinct, reproducible clinical subphenotypes: (A) SAB associated with older age and comorbidity, (B) nosocomial intravenous catheter-associated SAB in younger people without comorbidity, (C) community-acquired metastatic SAB, (D) SAB associated with chronic kidney disease, and (E) SAB associated with injection drug use. Survival and microbiologic outcomes differed between the subphenotypes. Mortality was highest in subphenotype A and lowest in subphenotypes B and E. Microbiologic outcomes were worse in subphenotype C. In a secondary analysis of the ARREST trial, adjunctive rifampicin was associated with increased mortality in subphenotype B and improved microbiologic outcomes in subphenotype C.

Conclusions: We have identified reproducible and clinically relevant subphenotypes within SAB and provide proof of principle of differential treatment effects. Through clinical trial enrichment and patient stratification, these subphenotypes could contribute to a personalized medicine approach to SAB.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的临床亚型。
背景:金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症(SAB)是一种临床异质性疾病。识别具有共同特征(亚表型)的患者亚群的能力是一项尚未满足的需求,这种能力可对患者进行分层,以便于临床管理和研究。我们的目的是验证一个假设,即可以在 SAB 患者中重复识别出与临床相关的亚表型:我们研究了三组住院成人单微生物SAB患者:英国回顾性观察研究(爱丁堡队列,n=458)、英国ARREST随机试验(n=758)和西班牙SAFO随机试验(n=214)。在不考虑结果的情况下,使用常规收集的临床数据进行潜类分析以确定亚型。然后对不同亚型的死亡率和微生物学结果进行比较:纳入的患者主要患有对甲氧西林敏感的 SAB(1366/1430,95.5%)。我们发现了五种不同的、可重复的临床亚型:(A) 与高龄和合并症相关的 SAB,(B) 在无合并症的年轻人中发生的与鼻腔静脉导管相关的 SAB,(C) 社区获得的转移性 SAB,(D) 与慢性肾病相关的 SAB,以及 (E) 与注射吸毒相关的 SAB。不同亚型的存活率和微生物学结果各不相同。亚型 A 的 84 天死亡率最高,亚型 B 和亚型 E 最低。亚型 C 的微生物学结果较差。在 ARREST 试验的二次分析中,辅助利福平与亚型 B 的 84 天死亡率增加和亚型 C 的微生物学结果改善有关:我们在 SAB 中发现了可重复的临床相关亚型,并提供了不同治疗效果的原理证明。通过丰富临床试验和对患者进行分层,这些亚型可为 SAB 的个性化医疗方法做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Clinical Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
25.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
900
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Infectious Diseases (CID) is dedicated to publishing original research, reviews, guidelines, and perspectives with the potential to reshape clinical practice, providing clinicians with valuable insights for patient care. CID comprehensively addresses the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of a wide spectrum of infectious diseases. The journal places a high priority on the assessment of current and innovative treatments, microbiology, immunology, and policies, ensuring relevance to patient care in its commitment to advancing the field of infectious diseases.
期刊最新文献
Behavioral Boosts, Getting More Bang for Your Buck: Financial incentives for outpatient antibiotic stewardship. Cabotegravir Maintains Protective Efficacy in the Setting of Bacterial STIs: A Secondary Analysis of HPTN 083. Higher Serologic Responses of Early Syphilis to Single-dose Benzathine Penicillin G Plus Doxycycline Versus Single-dose Benzathine Penicillin G Alone Among People With HIV. Reply to Villareal and El-Altrouni: Clarifications of the 2023 Duke-International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases Criteria for Infective Endocarditis. Questions About the 2023 Infective Endocarditis Updated Criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1