Efficacy of lignocaine nebulization in patients with COVID-19 respiratory infection: An exploratory randomized double-blinded controlled trial.

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-16 DOI:10.4103/joacp.joacp_205_22
Praveen Talawar, Debendra Kumar Tripathy, Ashutosh Kaushal, Mridul Dhar, Adabala Vijaybabu, Praik Tuppad, Sangadala Priyanka, Deepak Kumar, Ruhi Sharma, Sumedha Suresh Kumar
{"title":"Efficacy of lignocaine nebulization in patients with COVID-19 respiratory infection: An exploratory randomized double-blinded controlled trial.","authors":"Praveen Talawar, Debendra Kumar Tripathy, Ashutosh Kaushal, Mridul Dhar, Adabala Vijaybabu, Praik Tuppad, Sangadala Priyanka, Deepak Kumar, Ruhi Sharma, Sumedha Suresh Kumar","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_205_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-related pneumonia is proposed to be an inflammatory process. The treatment currently includes supportive therapy and low-dose steroids. Anti-inflammatory drugs have been proposed to prevent cytokine storms and improve oxygenation in such cases. The study aimed to assess the efficacy of nebulized lignocaine in COVID-19 patients with pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This was an exploratory randomized double-blinded control trial conducted in COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure requiring oxygen therapy either by face mask or non-invasive mechanical ventilation. Patients included were of the age of more than 18 years of either gender. The patients were randomized to receive either lignocaine or distilled water nebulization. The outcomes assessed were PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio, hemodynamics, respiratory parameters, and sequential organ failure score (SOFA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two groups were comparable concerning demographic variables. The PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> were significantly higher in the lignocaine group from day 2 onward. The SPO<sub>2</sub> was significantly higher on day 3 in the lignocaine group and thereafter there was no significant difference. Other hemodynamic, respiratory parameters, and SOFA scores showed no difference in both the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lignocaine nebulization improved oxygenation in COVID-19 patients and can be used as adjunctive therapy along with other supportive medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11196040/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_205_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-related pneumonia is proposed to be an inflammatory process. The treatment currently includes supportive therapy and low-dose steroids. Anti-inflammatory drugs have been proposed to prevent cytokine storms and improve oxygenation in such cases. The study aimed to assess the efficacy of nebulized lignocaine in COVID-19 patients with pneumonia.

Material and methods: This was an exploratory randomized double-blinded control trial conducted in COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure requiring oxygen therapy either by face mask or non-invasive mechanical ventilation. Patients included were of the age of more than 18 years of either gender. The patients were randomized to receive either lignocaine or distilled water nebulization. The outcomes assessed were PaO2/FiO2 ratio, hemodynamics, respiratory parameters, and sequential organ failure score (SOFA).

Results: The two groups were comparable concerning demographic variables. The PaO2/FiO2 were significantly higher in the lignocaine group from day 2 onward. The SPO2 was significantly higher on day 3 in the lignocaine group and thereafter there was no significant difference. Other hemodynamic, respiratory parameters, and SOFA scores showed no difference in both the groups.

Conclusion: Lignocaine nebulization improved oxygenation in COVID-19 patients and can be used as adjunctive therapy along with other supportive medications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19呼吸道感染患者雾化吸入木质素的疗效:一项探索性随机双盲对照试验。
背景和目的:冠状病毒病(COVID-19)相关肺炎被认为是一种炎症过程。目前的治疗方法包括支持疗法和小剂量类固醇。有人建议使用抗炎药物来防止细胞因子风暴并改善此类病例的氧合。本研究旨在评估雾化木质素对 COVID-19 肺炎患者的疗效:这是一项探索性随机双盲对照试验,针对 COVID-19 呼吸衰竭患者进行,患者需要使用面罩或无创机械通气进行吸氧治疗。患者年龄在 18 岁以上,性别不限。患者被随机分配接受木质素或蒸馏水雾化吸入。评估结果包括PaO2/FiO2比值、血液动力学、呼吸参数和序贯器官衰竭评分(SOFA):结果:两组在人口统计学变量方面具有可比性。结果:两组在人口统计学变量方面具有可比性,从第 2 天起,木质素组的 PaO2/FiO2 明显更高。木质素组的 SPO2 在第 3 天明显升高,此后无明显差异。两组的其他血液动力学、呼吸参数和 SOFA 评分均无差异:结论:雾化吸入木质素可改善 COVID-19 患者的氧合状况,可与其他辅助药物一起作为辅助疗法使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
期刊最新文献
"Burnout syndrome" in anesthesiologists and remedial measures- A narrative review. Stellate ganglion block beyond chronic pain: A literature review on its application in painful and non-painful conditions. Ropivacaine pharmacokinetics in the arterial and venous pools after ultrasound-guided continuous thoracic paravertebral nerve block. Role of an epidural in laparoscopic surgeries. Managing a leaky epidural catheter: Thinking out of the box.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1