Proton therapy for intracranial meningioma: a single-institution retrospective analysis of efficacy, survival and toxicity outcomes.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neuro-Oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1007/s11060-024-04751-x
Alberto Iannalfi, Giulia Riva, Sara Lillo, Lucia Ciccone, Giulia Fontana, Silvia Molinelli, Luca Trombetta, Mario Ciocca, Sara Imparato, Mattia Pecorilla, Ester Orlandi
{"title":"Proton therapy for intracranial meningioma: a single-institution retrospective analysis of efficacy, survival and toxicity outcomes.","authors":"Alberto Iannalfi, Giulia Riva, Sara Lillo, Lucia Ciccone, Giulia Fontana, Silvia Molinelli, Luca Trombetta, Mario Ciocca, Sara Imparato, Mattia Pecorilla, Ester Orlandi","doi":"10.1007/s11060-024-04751-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report the outcomes of a large series of intracranial meningiomas (IMs) submitted to proton therapy (PT) with curative intent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis on all consecutive IM patients treated between 2014 and 2021. The median PT prescription dose was 55.8 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and 66 GyRBE for benign/radiologically diagnosed and atypical/anaplastic IMs, respectively. Local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), overall survival (OS), and radionecrosis-free survival (RNFS) were evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariable analysis was performed to identify potential prognostic factors for clinical outcomes. Toxicity was reported according to the latest Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 167 patients were included. With a median follow-up of 41 months (range, 6-99), twelve patients (7%) developed tumor local recurrence after a median time of 39 months. The 5-year LRFS was 88% for the entire cohort, with a significant difference between benign/radiologically diagnosed and atypical/anaplastic IMs (98% vs. 47%, p < 0.001); this significant difference was maintained also for the 5-year OS and the 5-year DRFS rates. Patients aged ≤ 56 years reported significantly better outcomes, whereas lower prescription doses and skull base location were associated with better RNFS rates. Two patients experienced G3 acute toxicities (1.2%), and three patients G3 late toxicities (1.8%). There were no G4-G5 adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PT proved to be effective with an acceptable toxicity profile. To the best of our knowledge this is one of the largest series including IM patients submitted to PT.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04751-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To report the outcomes of a large series of intracranial meningiomas (IMs) submitted to proton therapy (PT) with curative intent.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis on all consecutive IM patients treated between 2014 and 2021. The median PT prescription dose was 55.8 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and 66 GyRBE for benign/radiologically diagnosed and atypical/anaplastic IMs, respectively. Local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), overall survival (OS), and radionecrosis-free survival (RNFS) were evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariable analysis was performed to identify potential prognostic factors for clinical outcomes. Toxicity was reported according to the latest Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.

Results: Overall, 167 patients were included. With a median follow-up of 41 months (range, 6-99), twelve patients (7%) developed tumor local recurrence after a median time of 39 months. The 5-year LRFS was 88% for the entire cohort, with a significant difference between benign/radiologically diagnosed and atypical/anaplastic IMs (98% vs. 47%, p < 0.001); this significant difference was maintained also for the 5-year OS and the 5-year DRFS rates. Patients aged ≤ 56 years reported significantly better outcomes, whereas lower prescription doses and skull base location were associated with better RNFS rates. Two patients experienced G3 acute toxicities (1.2%), and three patients G3 late toxicities (1.8%). There were no G4-G5 adverse events.

Conclusion: PT proved to be effective with an acceptable toxicity profile. To the best of our knowledge this is one of the largest series including IM patients submitted to PT.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颅内脑膜瘤的质子治疗:对疗效、存活率和毒性结果的单一机构回顾性分析。
目的:报告以治愈为目的接受质子治疗(PT)的颅内脑膜瘤(IMs)的大型系列研究结果:我们对2014年至2021年间接受治疗的所有连续性脑膜瘤患者进行了回顾性分析。良性/放射学诊断和非典型/无弹性IM的质子治疗处方剂量中位数分别为55.8 Gy相对生物效应(RBE)和66 GyRBE。采用卡普兰-梅耶法评估了无局部复发生存期(LRFS)、无远处复发生存期(DRFS)、总生存期(OS)和无放射性坏死生存期(RNFS)。进行单变量分析以确定临床结果的潜在预后因素。毒性根据最新的《不良事件通用术语标准》(CTCAE)5.0版进行报告:共纳入 167 名患者。中位随访时间为41个月(6-99个月),12名患者(7%)在中位39个月后出现肿瘤局部复发。整个组群的5年LRFS为88%,良性/放射学诊断的IM与不典型/非典型IM之间存在显著差异(98% vs. 47%, p 结论:PT治疗被证明是有效的,且疗效令人满意:PT 被证明是有效的,且毒性可接受。据我们所知,这是包括接受PT治疗的IM患者在内的最大规模系列研究之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Journal of Neuro-Oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
277
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuro-Oncology is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing basic, applied, and clinical investigations in all research areas as they relate to cancer and the central nervous system. It provides a single forum for communication among neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologists, neuropathologists, neurodiagnosticians, and laboratory-based oncologists conducting relevant research. The Journal of Neuro-Oncology does not seek to isolate the field, but rather to focus the efforts of many disciplines in one publication through a format which pulls together these diverse interests. More than any other field of oncology, cancer of the central nervous system requires multi-disciplinary approaches. To alleviate having to scan dozens of journals of cell biology, pathology, laboratory and clinical endeavours, JNO is a periodical in which current, high-quality, relevant research in all aspects of neuro-oncology may be found.
期刊最新文献
Association between sociodemographic variables and delayed patient presentation among surgical neuro-oncology patients in Mexico City: a single institution experience. Determinants of long-term survival in patients with IDH-mutant gliomas. Ethnicity in neuro-oncology research: How are we doing and how can we do better? Stem the blood flow: beneficial impact of bevacizumab on survival of subventricular zone glioblastoma patients. Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with spinal metastases from prostate cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1