The costs and benefits of kindness for kids

IF 1.8 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Experimental Child Psychology Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105987
Oliver Scott Curry , Chloe San Miguel , Mehmet Necip Tunç
{"title":"The costs and benefits of kindness for kids","authors":"Oliver Scott Curry ,&nbsp;Chloe San Miguel ,&nbsp;Mehmet Necip Tunç","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>What do children think makes an act kind? Which kind acts are children likely to perform? Previous research with adults suggests that the kindness of acts depends largely on the benefit provided and to a lesser extent on the cost incurred, and that adults are more likely to perform low-cost, high-benefit kind acts. In the current study, children (9–12 years, <em>n</em> = 945) and teens (13–17 years, <em>n</em> = 939) rated the benefit, cost, kindness, and likelihood of performing 173 acts of kindness, and adults (18+ years, <em>n</em> = 891) rated how beneficial, costly, kind, and likely the acts would be for young people to perform. Among children and teens, benefit but <em>not</em> cost predicted the kindness of acts, and benefit positively predicted, but cost negatively predicted, performance (for “kindness quotients” of 61% and 65%, respectively). Among adults, benefit <em>and</em> cost predicted the kindness of acts, and cost, but <em>not</em> benefit, negatively predicted performance (for a kindness quotient of 59%). The results for children and teens are similar to those from previous research with adults; however, adults are more sensitive to cost when rating kindness, are less sensitive to benefit when rating performance by young people, and are less likely to think young people will perform acts of kindness overall. In practical terms, the results suggest that recommending cost-effective acts may be the best way to encourage children to be kinder.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096524001279","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What do children think makes an act kind? Which kind acts are children likely to perform? Previous research with adults suggests that the kindness of acts depends largely on the benefit provided and to a lesser extent on the cost incurred, and that adults are more likely to perform low-cost, high-benefit kind acts. In the current study, children (9–12 years, n = 945) and teens (13–17 years, n = 939) rated the benefit, cost, kindness, and likelihood of performing 173 acts of kindness, and adults (18+ years, n = 891) rated how beneficial, costly, kind, and likely the acts would be for young people to perform. Among children and teens, benefit but not cost predicted the kindness of acts, and benefit positively predicted, but cost negatively predicted, performance (for “kindness quotients” of 61% and 65%, respectively). Among adults, benefit and cost predicted the kindness of acts, and cost, but not benefit, negatively predicted performance (for a kindness quotient of 59%). The results for children and teens are similar to those from previous research with adults; however, adults are more sensitive to cost when rating kindness, are less sensitive to benefit when rating performance by young people, and are less likely to think young people will perform acts of kindness overall. In practical terms, the results suggest that recommending cost-effective acts may be the best way to encourage children to be kinder.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
善待孩子的代价和益处
儿童认为什么行为是善良的?儿童有可能做出哪些善举?以往对成年人的研究表明,行为是否善良主要取决于所提供的利益,其次才是所付出的代价,而且成年人更有可能做出低代价、高利益的善良行为。在本研究中,儿童(9-12 岁,945 人)和青少年(13-17 岁,939 人)对 173 种善举的益处、成本、善良程度和实施的可能性进行了评分,成年人(18 岁以上,891 人)对年轻人实施这些善举的益处、成本、善良程度和可能性进行了评分。在儿童和青少年中,收益而非成本可以预测行为的善意程度,收益可以预测行为的善意程度,而成本可以预测行为的善意程度("善意商数 "分别为 61% 和 65%)。在成人中,利益和成本都能预测行为的善意程度,而成本(而非利益)对表现有负面预测作用(善意商为 59%)。针对儿童和青少年的研究结果与之前针对成年人的研究结果相似;但是,成年人在评价善举时对成本更为敏感,在评价年轻人的表现时对收益不太敏感,而且总体上不太可能认为年轻人会做出善举。实际上,研究结果表明,推荐具有成本效益的行为可能是鼓励孩子变得更善良的最佳方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.
期刊最新文献
Examining the relationship between psychosocial adversity and inhibitory control: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of children growing up in extreme poverty Out of sight, not out of mind: New pupillometric evidence on object permanence in a sample of 10- and 12-month-old German infants Culturally and linguistically diverse children’s retention of spoken narratives encoded in quiet and in babble noise Attention–language interface in Multilingual Assessment instrument for Narratives Perspective matters in goal-predictive gaze shifts during action observation: Results from 6-, 9-, and 12-month-olds and adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1