Physicians working with physician assistants and nurse practitioners: perceived effects on clinical practice.

Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2024-06-25 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxae070
Xiaochu Hu, Bettie Coplan, Hilary Barnes, Noël Smith, Alison Essary, Michael Dill
{"title":"Physicians working with physician assistants and nurse practitioners: perceived effects on clinical practice.","authors":"Xiaochu Hu, Bettie Coplan, Hilary Barnes, Noël Smith, Alison Essary, Michael Dill","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physicians in the United States are increasingly working with physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs), but little is known about how they perceive working with PAs and NPs affects their clinical practice. We used a new national survey to examine physicians' perceptions of working with PAs and/or NPs on their patient volume, care quality, time use, and workload. Among our analytical sample of 5823 physicians, 59% reported working with PAs and/or NPs. Most reported that PAs and NPs positively affected their clinical practice. Among several findings, physicians working in medical schools and with higher incomes were more likely to indicate that PAs improve their clinical practices in all 4 aspects, while being in specialties with higher women's representation was associated with lower ratings for working with PAs. Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander physicians and those with higher incomes were more likely to signify that NPs improved their clinical practices in all 4 aspects. These findings provide valuable insights, from the physicians' perspective, on care delivery reform.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11196955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physicians in the United States are increasingly working with physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs), but little is known about how they perceive working with PAs and NPs affects their clinical practice. We used a new national survey to examine physicians' perceptions of working with PAs and/or NPs on their patient volume, care quality, time use, and workload. Among our analytical sample of 5823 physicians, 59% reported working with PAs and/or NPs. Most reported that PAs and NPs positively affected their clinical practice. Among several findings, physicians working in medical schools and with higher incomes were more likely to indicate that PAs improve their clinical practices in all 4 aspects, while being in specialties with higher women's representation was associated with lower ratings for working with PAs. Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander physicians and those with higher incomes were more likely to signify that NPs improved their clinical practices in all 4 aspects. These findings provide valuable insights, from the physicians' perspective, on care delivery reform.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医生与医生助理和护士合作:对临床实践的影响。
在美国,越来越多的医生开始与医生助理(PA)和执业护士(NP)合作,但对于他们如何看待与 PA 和 NP 合作对其临床实践的影响却知之甚少。我们利用一项新的全国性调查来研究医生对与 PA 和/或 NP 合作在病人数量、护理质量、时间使用和工作量方面的看法。在我们对 5823 名医生的分析样本中,59% 的医生表示曾与助理医师和/或护师合作。大多数人表示,助理医师和护师对他们的临床实践产生了积极影响。在几项发现中,在医学院工作和收入较高的医生更有可能表示助理医师在所有 4 个方面都改善了他们的临床实践,而在女性比例较高的专科工作的医生对与助理医师合作的评价较低。夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民医生以及收入较高的医生更有可能表示护师在所有 4 个方面都改善了他们的临床实践。这些发现从医生的角度为医疗服务改革提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The state of health information organizations and plans to participate in the federal exchange framework. Accessibility of diabetes education in the United States: barriers, policy implications, and the road ahead. Differential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health service access among Medicaid-enrolled individuals. An increasing number of states filled Conrad 30 waivers for recruiting international medical graduates. Over- and underreporting of prices: most hospitals are not compliant with the Hospital Price Transparency Rule.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1