Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a novel marker of type 2 diabetes mellitus and diabetic microvascular complications.

Postgraduate medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1080/00325481.2024.2373684
Gulali Aktas, Tuba Taslamacioglu Duman, Burcin Atak Tel
{"title":"Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a novel marker of type 2 diabetes mellitus and diabetic microvascular complications.","authors":"Gulali Aktas, Tuba Taslamacioglu Duman, Burcin Atak Tel","doi":"10.1080/00325481.2024.2373684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its microvascular complications are characterized by chronic inflammation. The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a tool used to assess nutritional status and is often associated indirectly with inflammatory processes. We aimed to compare the CONUT scores of T2DM patients with those of healthy volunteers and to compare T2DM patients with and without microvascular complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with T2DM and healthy volunteers (as controls) were included in the study. The CONUT score is calculated using the following formula: serum albumin score + total cholesterol score + total lymphocyte count score. CONUT scores of T2DM patients and healthy controls, as well as those of diabetics with and without microvascular complications, were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CONUT scores of the T2DM and control groups were (1 [0-7]) and (0 [0-2]), respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of the CONUT score (<1.5 threshold) in detecting T2DM were 43% and 90%, respectively (AUC: 0.67, <i>p</i> < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.64-0.71). Moreover, the CONUT score was an independent risk factor for T2DM (OR: 0.34, <i>p</i> < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.22-0.52). The CONUT score of T2DM patients with microvascular complications (2 [0-7]) was significantly higher than that of T2DM patients without microvascular complications (0 [0-4]) and control subjects (0 [0-2]) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). A CONUT score higher than 1.5 had 83% sensitivity and 92% specificity in detecting T2DM with microvascular complications (AUC: 0.91, <i>p</i> < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.89-0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CONUT score could be useful in detecting diabetic microvascular complications in clinical practice, as it is an inexpensive and easy-to-assess marker.</p>","PeriodicalId":94176,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate medicine","volume":" ","pages":"496-503"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2024.2373684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its microvascular complications are characterized by chronic inflammation. The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a tool used to assess nutritional status and is often associated indirectly with inflammatory processes. We aimed to compare the CONUT scores of T2DM patients with those of healthy volunteers and to compare T2DM patients with and without microvascular complications.

Methods: Patients diagnosed with T2DM and healthy volunteers (as controls) were included in the study. The CONUT score is calculated using the following formula: serum albumin score + total cholesterol score + total lymphocyte count score. CONUT scores of T2DM patients and healthy controls, as well as those of diabetics with and without microvascular complications, were compared.

Results: The CONUT scores of the T2DM and control groups were (1 [0-7]) and (0 [0-2]), respectively (p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of the CONUT score (<1.5 threshold) in detecting T2DM were 43% and 90%, respectively (AUC: 0.67, p < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.64-0.71). Moreover, the CONUT score was an independent risk factor for T2DM (OR: 0.34, p < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.22-0.52). The CONUT score of T2DM patients with microvascular complications (2 [0-7]) was significantly higher than that of T2DM patients without microvascular complications (0 [0-4]) and control subjects (0 [0-2]) (p < 0.001). A CONUT score higher than 1.5 had 83% sensitivity and 92% specificity in detecting T2DM with microvascular complications (AUC: 0.91, p < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.89-0.93).

Conclusion: The CONUT score could be useful in detecting diabetic microvascular complications in clinical practice, as it is an inexpensive and easy-to-assess marker.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
控制营养状况(CONUT)评分是 2 型糖尿病和糖尿病微血管并发症的新型标记。
目的:2 型糖尿病(T2DM)及其微血管并发症的特点是慢性炎症。控制营养状况(CONUT)评分是一种用于评估营养状况的工具,通常与炎症过程间接相关。我们的目的是比较 T2DM 患者和健康志愿者的 CONUT 评分,并比较有和没有微血管并发症的 T2DM 患者:研究对象包括确诊为 T2DM 的患者和健康志愿者(作为对照)。CONUT 评分的计算公式如下:血清白蛋白评分 + 总胆固醇评分 + 总淋巴细胞计数评分。比较了 T2DM 患者和健康对照组的 CONUT 分数,以及有和无微血管并发症的糖尿病患者的 CONUT 分数:结果:T2DM 组和对照组的 CONUT 评分分别为(1[0-7])和(0[0-2])(p p p p p 结论:CONUT 评分可用于诊断糖尿病患者的微血管并发症:在临床实践中,CONUT 评分可用于检测糖尿病微血管并发症,因为它是一种成本低廉、易于评估的标记物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Delayed diagnosis of adult onset Still's disease in 2 cases: diagnostic dilemma in positive antinuclear antibody and tuberculosis endemic areas. The triglyceride-glucose index as an indicator of latent atherogenicity of the plasma lipid profile in healthy men with normolipidaemia. Calcific aortic valve disease and cardiometabolic triggers: an explanation behind progression of aortic valvular disease and failure of medical therapy interventions. Advances in insulin: a review of icodec as a novel once-weekly treatment for type 2 diabetes. Is it time to finally retire the pantoprazole "drip"?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1