Registries or non-pharmacological observational studies? An operational attempt to draw the line and to provide some suggestions for the ethical evaluation of rare disease registries.

Sabina Gainotti, Paola Torreri, Chiara Mannelli, Celeste Cagnazzo, Bruno Ficara, Carlo Petrini
{"title":"Registries or non-pharmacological observational studies? An operational attempt to draw the line and to provide some suggestions for the ethical evaluation of rare disease registries.","authors":"Sabina Gainotti, Paola Torreri, Chiara Mannelli, Celeste Cagnazzo, Bruno Ficara, Carlo Petrini","doi":"10.4415/ANN_24_01_05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Originally established to evaluate the ethical aspects of clinical trials, Ethics Committees (ECs) are now requested to review different types of projects, including, among others, observational studies and disease registries. In Italy, clinical trials on medicinal products for human use and on medical devices are regulated by EU Regulation 536/2014, EU Regulation 2017/745, and 2017/746 while pharmacological observational studies are regulated by the Italian Medicines Agency guidelines of 2008 and by Ministerial Decree of November 30th, 2021. The other types of studies are not strictly regulated, causing discrepancies in their definition and assessment by the ECs, and slowdowns in the start of projects. The present contribution aims to propose definitions and distinctions between non-pharmacological observational studies and disease registries, which constitute different entities but are often assimilated by ECs, and to formulate suggestions for the evaluation of rare disease registries, which are an expanding research area of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":502090,"journal":{"name":"Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita","volume":"60 1","pages":"29-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4415/ANN_24_01_05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Originally established to evaluate the ethical aspects of clinical trials, Ethics Committees (ECs) are now requested to review different types of projects, including, among others, observational studies and disease registries. In Italy, clinical trials on medicinal products for human use and on medical devices are regulated by EU Regulation 536/2014, EU Regulation 2017/745, and 2017/746 while pharmacological observational studies are regulated by the Italian Medicines Agency guidelines of 2008 and by Ministerial Decree of November 30th, 2021. The other types of studies are not strictly regulated, causing discrepancies in their definition and assessment by the ECs, and slowdowns in the start of projects. The present contribution aims to propose definitions and distinctions between non-pharmacological observational studies and disease registries, which constitute different entities but are often assimilated by ECs, and to formulate suggestions for the evaluation of rare disease registries, which are an expanding research area of interest.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
登记还是非药物观察研究?为罕见病登记处的伦理评估划清界限并提供一些建议的实际尝试。
伦理委员会(EC)最初是为评估临床试验的伦理方面而成立的,现在则被要求审查不同类型的项目,其中包括观察性研究和疾病登记。在意大利,欧盟第 536/2014 号法规、欧盟第 2017/745 号法规和第 2017/746 号法规对人用医药产品和医疗器械的临床试验进行监管,而药理学观察研究则由意大利药品管理局 2008 年的指导方针和 2021 年 11 月 30 日的部长令进行监管。其他类型的研究未受到严格监管,导致欧盟委员会对其定义和评估存在差异,项目启动速度放缓。本报告旨在提出非药物观察性研究与疾病登记之间的定义和区别,两者构成不同的实体,但往往被欧盟委员会所吸收,并为罕见疾病登记的评估提出建议,罕见疾病登记是一个不断扩大的研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of four common electronic mosquito repellers on Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens. Pandemic impact on training and mental health of medical residents: an Italian multicentre prospective study. Recommendations for preventing sentinel events: results of a national cross-sectional survey in Italy. Serious games in child and adolescent health education campaigns: a systematic review. The European legislation on the restriction on intentionally added microplastics. Commentary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1